Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05MANAMA197 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05MANAMA197 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Manama |
| Created: | 2005-02-13 07:33:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KPAO KJUS KDEM OEXC PREL BA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MANAMA 000197 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR ECA/PE/C/NEA and NEA/ARPI E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KPAO, KJUS, KDEM, OEXC, PREL, BA SUBJECT: BAHRAINI PARTICIPANTS CRITIQUE THE SMU RULE OF LAW FORUM 1. (U) On September 28, 2004 an 18-person Bahraini delegation consisting of the ministers, parliamentarians, business community, and judges embarked on a ten-day "Rule of Law" forum in Washington, New York and Dallas. The Ambassador accompanied the delegation organized by John Attanasio, Dean of Southern Methodist University's Dedham Law School. This USG-funded program was the brainchild of Senator Hutchinson (R-TX); Bahrain was the second country to respond positively to the initiative. 2. (U) In the weeks following the delegation's return, PolOff and PolFSN met individually with the participants to discuss the trip and as a basis for future cooperation. Dean Attanasio re-visited Bahrain on December 18-20, 2004 and dined at the Ambassador's invitation with the delegation. An overview of trip planning and their comments follows: -------------------- Delegation Selection -------------------- 3. (U) Dean Attanasio visited Bahrain on four separate occasions to brief over 150 Bahraini leaders about the forum. Many Bahrainis expressed enthusiasm about participating and went so far as to lobby EmbOffs for a place in the delegation. In May 2004, prior to leaving post, Ambassador, DCM and P/E cleared the list of delegates PolOff proposed. A complete switch-out of the Front Office prevented PolOff from sending formal invitations in advance of the incoming Ambassador's arrival. Invitations were sent two weeks prior to departure date. Anticipating a 10-day turnaround to process J-1 visas, PolOff immediately scheduled some delegates to come in early for fingerscanning and name checking. 4. (U) Although the Minister of Justice Al Arrayedh had approved PolOff's proposed delegation in May 2004, just prior to the mission he took a second look and decided to recast the delegation in order, he said, to put together a group that would work well as a team. This included dropping the Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Majeed Moshin Al Alawi off the delegation (presumably to avoid confusion as to who was heading the delegation.) This late change required PolOff and PolFSN to disinvite several delegates, who had already been fingerscanned and cleared namecheck. They also had the unfortunate task of informing expectant parliamentarians that formal invitations would not be forthcoming. As a result, four days prior to departure, Democratic Bloc leader Yousif Zainal went to the Minister of Justice's office and invited himself onto the delegation. Democratic Bloc leader Abdulnabi Salman attempted to join upon its arrival in the US. Several of the minister's choices were unable to participate at such late notice and were replaced by less relevant participants. This might have been avoided had we not had a lengthy gap between Ambassadors, who could have worked the issue directly with the Minister. --------- Logistics --------- 5. (U) The delegation required high maintenance during the logistics phase. Many members made frequent changes to their individual travel schedules. Director of the Minister of Justice's Office Nabeel Al Romaihi told PolOff that travel arrangements for incoming and outgoing flights should have been made directly with a travel agency. One participant made 17 changes to her flight arrangements. Both EmbOffs and Justice personnel were reeling. 6. (U) World Travel Services (WTS) Supervisor Fatima Karam told PolOff that access to SMU's travel credit card made payment for the economy portion of the airline tickets convenient. She also expressed relief that PolOff prepared WTS invoices for the first class portion of the tickets and ensured payment by the Ministry of Justice. SMU Travel Coordinator Rebekah Bell expressed her dismay of the high cost of the economy portion of the tickets. PolOff insisted that WTS book full fare unrestricted tickets in anticipation of delegates making numerous changes to their own itineraries. ----------------- In-country Travel ----------------- 7. (U) Shura Council members Alice Samaan and Jameel Al Matrook told PolOff that the hotels were comfortable and the food was excellent. Most everyone said the one-day trip to New York was exhausting and given the content (just one meeting) could have been skipped. -------------------- DHS - Friend or Foe? -------------------- 8. (U) Kudos to Katherine Van de Vate at ECA for her amazing turnaround of J-1 visas. Her recommendation to complete A-referrals on the delegates to ease entry into the US worked smoothly. She made last minute arrangements for DOS representatives to meet six incoming planes. The delegates were pleased with their welcome. 9. (U) In-country travel was more problematic. Because of the bloc airline reservations, Reagan National Airport had great difficulty clearing delegation members, causing lengthy delays at check-in. ECA provided tremendous help in both New York and Dallas to ensure delays at those airports would not be repeated. Final departure from Dulles was smooth except for one delegate who was pulled into secondary, objected to the treatment, and vowed never to travel to the US again. --------------- Program Content --------------- 10. (U) The delegation was generally appreciative of the program, especially the meeting with Deputy Secretary Armitage and the morning at the Supreme Court (highlighted by attendance at oral arguments and a meeting with Justices O'Connor and Breyer), as well as a series of lectures and meetings at the SMU School of Law. However, there was some frustration that the program seemed to be put together at the last minute in an unorganized manner. Some delegation members wished they had known in advance whom they were meeting. The visit to New York had only one meeting - with the N.Y. Federal Reserve. Some delegates had been told they would also meet with Citibank, and were disappointed that they did not have more meetings (BCIU, for example, could easily have organized something). With only one meeting, many felt that the New York stop should have been skipped. A breakfast meeting in Dallas seemed thrown together at the last minute; most of the local attendees had little overseas experience, and the conversation was not directed (Dr. Attanasio went to teach a class, and did not leave a moderator). 11. (U) The program had the feel of being put together on the fly by a busy Law School Dean who had great contacts but not sufficient time or staff to focus on program details. In the end, a program came together, but it would have been greatly enhanced if it had been arranged by a professional programmer. -------- Benefits -------- 12. (U) While the program was not perfect, participants in the end were pleased with the visit. It was unfortunate that Justice Al Arrayedh changed some of the participants at the last minute, but the delegation gelled in a very positive way (as he had intended). It was an excellent mix of legal experts, parliamentarians, and businessmen, many of whom do not operate in the same circles in Bahrain and valued the opportunity to travel together and exchange ideas. The delegates received a general introduction about rule of law issues, and how they relate to each of their sectors, and they emerged with a greater understanding of the rule of law. The oral arguments at the Supreme Court, which concerned commercial disputes brought by small enterprises to the highest court of the land, made a particular impression.
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04