Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02ABUJA858 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02ABUJA858 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abuja |
| Created: | 2002-03-15 15:01:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | EFIN ECON PREL NI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 000858 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2012 TAGS: EFIN, ECON, PREL, NI SUBJECT: NIGERIA AND THE IMF HEAD FOR DIVORCE COURT? REF: LAGOS 555 1. (U) Classified by CDA Andrews for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). 2. (C) Summary. After several days of consultations, the IMF and GON agreed not to establish a new program. This indefinite suspension is due to GON failure to meet informal targets and to political considerations in the lead-up to the 2003 election that will make belt-tightening nigh impossible. Trying to win points at home for "standing up to the IMF," the GON gave a populist spin to the suspension, stating it turned its back on the IMF to pursue a "home-grown" economic program more responsive to the citizenry's needs. Despite the break, the IMF intends to retain a resident mission, which will monitor the macroeconomy and provide capacity-building and technical assistance. While having no official impact, the break is one more hurdle for private sector investors to overcome and may force donors like the World Bank to reconsider assistance levels. End Summary. 3. (SBU) IMF Nigeria team leader Hiroyuki Hino led an eleven-member team to Nigeria from February 28 through March 6 to conduct a 2001 year-end review and decide on a recommended course of action for the Fund. Hino met with Ambassador Jeter on March 3, and the team met with the donor community on March 5. Although progress was achieved on many fronts, Nigeria met only a few actual targets, most of them related to privatization. Broader macroeconomic targets were generally missed. The IMF team categorized the GON's overall performance as unsatisfactory. The political machinations regarding the 2002 budget and economic realities led the IMF to conclude that the risks to a formal program were too high. 4. (SBU) The GON failed to complete agreed-upon targets on fiscal, monetary and foreign exchange rate policies as follows: (a) GON fourth quarter spending exceeded targets by 0.3 percent of GDP, or N15 billion. (b) Actual money supply growth was 36 percent compared with the target of 20 percent. (c) In January, the parallel market exchange rate climbed due to the release of pension payments. The spread between parallel and official rates remains at roughly 20 percent. -- Progress was seen in the following areas: (a) Inflation fell from a peak of 25 percent to 16.5 percent (year-on-year) in December 2001; (b) Foreign exchange reserves rose USD 1 billion on the calendar year; (c) Petroleum prices reached near import parity, thereby removing consumer fuel subsidies; (d) Money supply growth declined from a 60 percent annual rate in 2000 to 36 percent in 2001; (e) Fourth quarter spending was lower than the three previous quarters. Actual 2001 spending was N200 billion lower than the 2001 budget law; (f) Some stability was achieved in the parallel and official foreign exchange markets. The official rate showed increased flexibility (the Central Bank's rate moved from 110 to 116 in 2001). The GON allowed remittances from abroad to be freely traded and introduced foreign currency operator Thomas Cooke to the market. Thomas Cooke is currently issuing foreign currency-denominated travelers checks with little bureaucracy -- customers need only show a passport and airline ticket; and (g) Due process on capital projects was more effective than the IMF anticipated, although a few GON agencies still circumvented the process. Both sides agreed that reviewing projects worth N1 million or more was cumbersome; N50 million might be a more appropriate level. 5. (C) The spending contemplated by the 2002 budget, which continues to languish in the National Assembly, coupled with the National Assembly's push to complete implementation of the 2001 budget indicate that spending this year will be higher than in 2001. The National Assembly's investigation of President Obasanjo's refusal to execute the 2001 budget, and the constitutional implications of possibly turning over greater control over spending to the legislature, was cited by the IMF team as a factor that influenced their decision not to press for a formal program. Given political realities, Chief Economic Advisor Magnus Kpakol admitted privately that government spending would likely be higher this year than last. The House Finance Committee Chairman commented that without an IMF program, the National Assembly felt it has more "flexibility with government spending." Non-official estimates predict that 25 percent of total spending in 2002 will be deficit spending. Hino argued that such excess spending is "imprudent" and would create inflationary pressures, undermining the value of the Naira. To protect the Naira's value, the Central Bank will be forced to dip into its foreign reserves. ------------------------------------ Comment: Implications for the Future ------------------------------------ 6. (C) Whether this is a divorce or just a trial separation, the IMF's withdrawal from a formal program will certainly have implications for Nigeria's relationships with the international financial community. In light of the IMF's withdrawal, and in particular because of the Government of Nigeria,s reaction, Citibank is reviewing its Nigeria portfolio with the possibility of reducing exposure here. The World Bank Mission in Nigeria said that macroeconomic policy is a key factor in deciding loan levels, and that the IMF announcement might affect future decisions on how large the Bank program would be. Although the GON professes to intend to complete the bilateral rescheduling agreements pursuant to the December 2000 Paris Club Agreed Minute, Nigeria is farther away than ever from its goal of significant debt forgiveness. 7. (C) Few in the diplomatic community were surprised that the GON and the IMF could not agree to a formal program. At no point during the 2000-2001 SBA did the GON show a true commitment to the Fund program nor did it integrate the program into domestic policy. Nor were third parties surprised that the Nigerian Government would see political dividends in publicizing such a break as being unilateral. Indeed, before the team concluded its review, and shortly after Hino's arrival, the team leaders reported to Embassy officers that "no agreement would be reached." 8. (C) Ironically, the official breakdown of the program may present an opportunity for the IMF to make incremental progress with GON economic policy makers. Neither side is burdened with trying to follow an unrealistic script. With an IMF Country Director in place for the first time in eight months, the Fund can begin concentrating on technical assistance and capacity building without the pressure of having to stretch for politically unattainable macroeconomic targets. It gives the new IMF team a chance to build better relations and the GON an opportunity to announce its own economic reforms without being accused of knuckling under IMF pressure. 9. (C) The GON, despite its official break with the IMF, has not abandoned efforts to restrain spending. President Obasanjo has refused to execute prior-year budgets fully, and the CBN has lowered liquidity by raising interest rates and, in mid-2001, putting the brakes on borrowing by the state and local governments. The IMF hopes that the installation of an advisor in the Ministry of Finance will help avoid unbudgeted spending by parastatals and government offices. From now on the Fund will be literally on the inside (the country and Ministry) trying to encourage reform at both policy and implementation levels. While this is a fair distance from an ideal relationship, it may be the best that can be hoped for under the circumstances. Andrews
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04