Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ALMATY342 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ALMATY342 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | US Office Almaty |
| Created: | 2005-01-31 08:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PHUM PREL EAID KZ Human Rights POLITICAL |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ALMATY 000342 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/CACEN (JMUDGE), EUR/ACE (MO'NEAL), DRL/PHD (PDAVIS) DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS TO USAID E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PHUM, PREL, EAID, KZ, Human Rights, POLITICAL SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR'S MEETINGS WITH PRESIDENTIAL CHIEF OF STAFF DZHAKSYBEKOV AND SENATE SPEAKER ABYKAYEV ON TREATMENT OF DEMOCRACY NGOS AND POLITICAL OPPOSITION REF: Almaty 152 1. (SBU) Summary: During separate meetings on January 25 with Head of Presidential Administration Adilbek Dzhaksybekov and Senate Speaker Nurtay Abykayev, Ambassador cautioned that recent law enforcement raids targeting democracy NGOs and the dissolution of opposition party Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan (DCK) could negatively impact Kazakhstan's prospects for certification of progress on human rights. Dzakhsybekov maintained that Soros was welcome in Kazakhstan and asked Ambassador to convey an invitation to Mr. Soros to visit Kazakhstan and meet President Nazarbayev. The PA Chief argued that NGOs such as NDI were inciting confrontation with the government and that law enforcement had a responsibility to act. Ambassador counseled maintaining lines of communication to the U.S. mission on the actions of USAID implementing NGO partners. He also noted the Prosecutor General's suggestion of a meeting between his office and NGOs to improve compliance with local legal requirements. Dzkhasybekov and Abykayev told Ambassador that DCK's non-recognition of the government and call for civil disobedience in its party platform required a response from the government. Abykayev acknowledged, however, that the government should not act precipitously. End Summary. 2. (SBU) Ambassador reviewed the certification process for U.S. assistance with PA Chief Dzhaksybekov, highlighting the legislation's requirement that Kazakhstan demonstrate significant progress on human rights and democratic reform. Recent events, particularly raids by tax, customs and immigration authorities targeting USAID's implementing NGO partners for democracy programs and the liquidation of political opposition party DCK, could hinder certification and jeopardize programs important to bilateral cooperation, Ambassador warned. Astana, he pressed, should not allow the progress that has been made to be overshadowed. 3. (SBU) Dzhaksybekov responded that there was no "message" behind the visits by law enforcement authorities to democracy NGOs. These are "routine" calls in conjunction with the start of a new year. Local authorities, however, had a duty to pursue violations of the law. Dzakhsybekov acknowledged the tensions created by the handling of the Soros case. The PA Chief insisted, however, that President Nazarbayev bore no political ill will toward Soros. Ambassador noted that a report of a Customs visit to the Soros office just a few hours earlier created a different impression. 4. (SBU) Dzhaksybekov asked why Soros had appointed board members such as Ak Zhol's Abilov and DCK's Kozhakhmetov who were trying to "destabilize" society. The opposition, he continued, then proclaims these appointments as a sign of U.S. support. Ambassador explained that while the United States supports the right of Soros to carry out its work, the USG does not influence decisions on selection of board members. Dzhaksybekov expressed admiration for the work of Soros -- "it's just the people with the Fund in Kazakhstan" -- and asked that the Ambassador relay to Mr. Soros an invitation to meet President Nazarbayev in Kazakhstan. 5. (SBU) Turning to the treatment of other NGOs, Dzhaksybekov described Kazakhstan's concerns as more serious. He repeated charges that NDI had arranged for Kazakhstani students to go to Ukraine during the elections to receive training in destabilizing society (reftel). NDI and Freedom House, he charged, were attempting to incite training participants into confrontation with the government. 6. (SBU) Ambassador explained that NDI Ukraine had invited the students, and that the aim of the trip was simply to give the students experience as elections observers. Destabilization is not the aim of U.S. programs, he said. Ambassador asked that Kazakhstani authorities come to him and the Embassy if there is a belief that USAID implementing partners are violating the law. Ambassador noted and welcomed the Prosecutor General's suggestion at their January 24 meeting that the PG's office should meet with NGOs to cover questions of legal compliance (septel). 7. (SBU) As for DCK, Dzhaksybekov said that the party was responsible for its legal problems due to its denouncing the government as illegitimate and calling for civil disobedience. Deputy Foreign Minister Volkov added that DCK's pronouncements were not simply statements made in the heat of a political meeting, but were also part of DCK's party platform. Ambassador questioned "liquidating" DCK and whether this was an overly drastic response. He cautioned that a legal break up of the party less than a year after registration would almost certainly have an impact on certification. Dzhaksybekov insisted that the DCK's situation was a legal issue, and that the Prosecutor General had a responsibility to act. 8. (SBU) In a separate meeting on January 25, Ambassador also raised DCK's case with Senate Speaker Abykayev, noting the potential negative impact that dissolution of the party could have on Kazakhstan's prospects for certification. Liquidation of DCK, Abykayev said, was not final; court appeals were still ahead. Commenting on the case, Abykayev viewed DCK's call for disobedience as requiring a government response. The Senate Speaker offered, however, that a decision on DCK's future should not be made hastily. ASQUINO NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04