Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ASUNCION149 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ASUNCION149 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Asuncion |
| Created: | 2005-01-28 14:15:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PINR EFIN KCRM KTFN PA SOCIPY |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ASUNCION 000149 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA/BSC NSC FOR KIM BREIER JUSTICE FOR OPDAT AMY YOUNG TREASURY FOR OTA WARFIELD, VAN KOCH, MILLAR SOUTHCOM FOR POLAD DAN JOHNSON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PINR, EFIN, KCRM, KTFN, PA, SOCIPY SUBJECT: PARAGUAY: MONEY LAUNDERING IN CASINOS (C-TN4-01119) REF: STATE 255493 1. (U) SUMMARY: Paraguay is a principal money laundering center. Although no figures are known, Paraguayan Government officials suspect criminals, drug traffickers, and terrorist financiers use a range of illicit and licit activities to launder funds. While laws regarding casinos and a regulatory commission exist, lack of compliance with local laws and regulations by casinos and a lack of enforcement by the National Council on Games of Chance (CONAJZAR) limit the GOP,s ability to estimate any connections with organized criminal groups, drug trafficking organizations, trafficking in persons groups, or the impact of casinos on financial and judicial systems. Casinos are addressed in the current and new money laundering legislation, but Paraguay still lacks the appropriate enforcement, criminal investigation, and prosecution of criminal offenses for money laundering cases. All of these factors create an opportunity for the use of the casino industry for money laundering and other illicit business activity. Adoption and implementation of stronger money laundering legislation currently before Congress and stronger enforcement by CONAJZAR would allow the GOP to get a better handle on this issue. END SUMMARY. ------------------------- Casinos and the Local Law ------------------------- 2. Currently, casinos and the gaming industry in Paraguay are regulated under Law 1016, adopted in 1997. The law outlines provisions for which types of games are permitted in the legal casinos, who monitors and regulates the industry, and to whom the industry should report. The law specifically names CONAJZAR to be the regulatory body over the industry. CONAJZAR,s board members include representatives from the Department of Revenue, Departmental Governors, City and/or local government, the Ministry of Interior, and a representative from the equivalent of the U.S. Social Security Administration (DIBEN). The council functions as a component within the Department of Revenue and is responsible for the collection of operational fees paid by the casino on a regular basis. Also, casinos are addressed in the current money laundering legislation (law 1015) that requires casinos to reports suspicious activity and report the winnings of individuals. ------------------------------------------ Casinos-- A Missed Opportunity for the GOP ------------------------------------------ 3. While laws regarding casinos and a regulatory commission exist, lack of compliance with local laws and regulations by casinos and a lack of efficient record keeping by CONAJZAR limit the GOP,s ability to estimate any connections with organized criminal groups, drug trafficking organizations, trafficking in persons groups, or the impact of casinos on financial and judicial systems. Miguel Gomez, the President of CONAJZAR, told PolOff that CONAJZAR was unable to provide estimates as to how much casinos earn yearly, and whether any connections to drug trafficking organizations or money laundering groups exist. Furthermore, Gomez reported that the council is currently in a state of flux, since the 2004 reorganization of the council that required senior officials and Ministers to serve as representatives; in the past, these positions were assigned to lower level officials. 4. Paraguayan law requires casinos to provide suspicious activity reports and to report the winnings of individuals. However, according to Carlos Yegros, the director of the Financial Intelligence Unit within the Secretariat for the Prevention of Money Laundering (SEPRELAD), and Frederico Cabral, the Director of the Anti-Narcotics Directorate (SENAD),the FIU has never received a suspicious activity report (SAR) from any casino or gambling industry in the country. They also stated the casinos do not report the winnings of individuals. According to various law enforcement officials and prosecutors, Paraguay has never conducted an investigation or prosecuted anyone for laundering money in casinos. And to date, Paraguay has not successfully prosecuted anyone for money laundering. Improvement appears unlikely until a new money laundering law is passed in Congress. In fact, officials at both SENAD and SEPRELAD stated to PolOff that the casino industry normally does not fall into their scope of operations or investigations. 5. An area of concern noted by GOP officials from CONAJZAR is in the Quiniela game--in which a player picks his own number for a lottery, that is drawn daily. According to Miguel Gomez, only thirty-percent of the Quiniela operations in the country are legal and regulated by the Government. Officials state this game produces large earnings and is often run by illegal businesses. ---------------------------- Current Money Laundering Law ---------------------------- 6. Currently, money laundering is considered a criminal offense under Paraguay,s two anti-money laundering statutes, Law 1015 of 1996 and Article 196 of Paraguay,s Criminal Code, adopted in 1997. The existence of the two laws has led to substantial confusion due to overlapping provisions including the following: -- the law included in Article 196 in the scope of predicate offenses only those offenses that carry a maximum penalty of five years or more; law 1015 includes additional offenses; -- article 196 established a maximum penalty of five years for money laundering offenses, while law 1015 carries a prison term of two to ten years. This is particularly significant because, under the Criminal Code of 1998 and Criminal Procedure Code, defendants who accept charges that carry a maximum penalty of five years or less are automatically entitled to a suspended sentence and a fine instead of jail time, at least for the first offense; -- law 1015 contains "due diligence" and "banker negligence" provisions and applies money laundering controls to nonbanking financial institutions, such as casinos, exchange houses, cash couriers, and insurance companies. However, intermediaries such as lawyers, accountants and brokers/dealers are not controlled under the current law; -- the existing bank secrecy laws do not prevent banks and financial institutions from disclosing information to bank supervisors and law enforcement entities. Additionally, bankers and others are protected under the anti-money laundering law with respect to their cooperation with law enforcement agencies; -- law 1015 requires banks and financial institutions to know and record the identity of customers engaging in significant currency transactions and to report those suspicious activities to the FIU; -- the current legislation does not address alternative remittance systems, such as hawala and other black market exchanges. --------------------------------------------- -------- New Anti-Money Laundering Legislation Before Congress --------------------------------------------- -------- 7. Paraguay (with direct Embassy assistance) drafted a new law in late 2003 through early 2004 to improve the effectiveness of its money laundering legislation. The GOP formally introduced the new anti-money laundering bill to Congress in May 2004, where it now remains under consideration by legislative commissions. The draft bill should come before the full Congress for consideration in 2005. The new law reaffirms the existence of a single functional FIU under the direction of SEPRELAD, which reports directly to the Office of the President (similar to SENAD). The draft law also lays out the following provisions: -- establishes money laundering as an autonomous crime punishable by a prison term of five to 20 years; -- establishes predicate offenses as any crime that is punishable by a prison term exceeding six months and specifically criminalizes money laundering tied to the financing of terrorist groups or acts; -- allows prosecutors to recommend that judges freeze or confiscate assets connected to money laundering and its predicate offenses; -- creates a special asset forfeiture fund (to be administered by a consortium of national governmental agencies) to support programs for crime prevention and suppression, including combating money laundering and related training; -- requires the full range of relevant institutions to report suspicious transactions to SEPRELAD and to maintain registries of large currency transactions that equal or exceed $10,000, including proceeds from gambling or winnings at casinos; -- establishes penalties for falsifying or failure to file reports, "know-your-client provisions" and standardized record keeping for a minimum of seven years; -- requires SEPRELAD to refer cases as appropriate for further investigation to the Economic Crimes Investigatory Unit (UDIF) of SENAD and to the Attorney General,s Office for prosecution; -- establishes SEPRELAD as the central entity for related information exchanges with other concerned foreign entities; -- specifies that the UDIF of SENAD is the principal authority for carrying out all antidrug and other financial investigations, and will also have the authority to initiate investigation of cases on its own; -- establishes that obligated entities that must interact with SEPRELAD will include, inter alia, banks, financial institutions, insurance agencies, currency exchange houses, casinos, securities companies and brokers (including the stock exchange), investment companies, money transmitters, administrators of mutual investment and pension funds, credit unions, operators of gambling facilities, real estate agencies, nongovernmental organizations, pawnshops and dealers in jewels, precious stones and metals, automobiles, art and antiques. --------------------- Still Work to be Done --------------------- 6. While casinos are addressed in the current and new money laundering legislation, Paraguay still lacks the appropriate enforcement, criminal investigation, and prosecution of criminal offenses for money laundering cases. Paraguay does not have the resources necessary to ensure that casinos are compliant with the anti-money laundering legislation and are meeting reporting requirements to the FIU. Nor does the country have the proper Criminal Procedure Code, which allows Prosecutors to perform long-term criminal investigations. Additionally, there is no mechanism in place to trace the physical movement of large amounts of cash. Adoption and implementation of the new money laundering law and providing GOP authorities with the necessary resources and mechanisms essential for proper investigation and law enforcement will create an opportunity for Paraguay to get a better handle on the casino industry. To tap that opportunity, however, Paraguay's casino regulation commission, CONAJZAR, will need to get serious about compelling the casino industry to meet its reporting responsibilities. Other money laundering targets, such as exchange houses, also require greatly enhanced investigation and are a higher priority given the volume of fund transfers. KEANE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04