Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA394 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA394 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-01-25 15:35:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ETRD KIPR TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000394 SIPDIS DEPT FOR E, EB/TPP/MTA/IPC, EUR/ERA, EUR/SE USTR FOR LERRION/BPECK USEU FOR CHRIS WILSON USPTO FOR ELAINE WU USDOC FOR ITA/MAC/DDEFALCO SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, KIPR, TU SUBJECT: GOT's New Data Exclusivity Regulation - Major Gaps in Protection SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY. 1. (SBU) Summary: The GOT issued a revised regulation on January 19 providing a six-year term of data exclusivity protection for confidential pharmaceuticals test data effective January 1, 2005. The regulation contains major loopholes, including lack of retroactivity and other provisions which effectively whittle down the six-year term. The European Commission is evaluating Turkey's regulation in the context of its Trade Barrier Review (TBR) on barriers in the pharmaceuticals sector. Research-based industry is also meeting to consider next steps. End Summary. 2. (U) On January 19, the GOT announced its long-awaited policy on data exclusivity by publishing a revised pharmaceuticals marketing regulation in the State Gazette. Based on a preliminary review of the regulation (see para for 5 a translation provided by Pfizer) and comments by one U.S. company, the policy seems similar to earlier, unsatisfactory drafts on data exclusivity. The regulation provides a six-year term of data exclusivity protection beginning on January 1, 2005, and in certain cases, beginning in 2001, but with exceptions that could reduce its benefits to research- based companies. These include: -- Starting the six-year term on the date of licensing in an EU Customs Union country. According to Pfizer, this provision cuts the effective term of protection because it can take over 200 days for a drug to go through the marketing approval process in Turkey; -- Limiting the term of data exclusivity to the term of the drug's patent in Turkey. Note: A Pfizer representative told us that this is unhelpful, but not inconsistent with existing EU regulations. End Note; -- Original products licensed in a Customs Union country after January 1, 2001 can enjoy data exclusivity protection, unless generics manufacturers have applied for licenses in Turkey prior to 2005. According to U.S. industry, there are hundreds, and possibly over 1,000 pending applications in this category at the Ministry of Health. With this vast loophole, relatively few drugs launched prior to 2005 will be able to benefit from data exclusivity protection. 3. (SBU) An EU diplomat told us that the GOT had provided no advance notice to Brussels of this regulation, despite the fact that the European Commission had raised data exclusivity and other pharmaceuticals concerns with the Turks in writing through the TBR process. She told Econoff that Brussels would evaluate the regulation in meetings later this week. 4. (SBU) Comment and Recommendation: It appears that the new GOT regulation falls far short of a satisfactory solution to our concerns on data exclusivity, and that this issue, along with patent linkage, will be leading subjects in the upcoming Special 301 review of Turkey. Although the EU declined an earlier U.S. request to do a joint demarche on this subject to the Turks, the time may be ripe for another approach to Brussels. We recommend that Washington agencies consider the merits of a joint demarche, and, if appropriate, provide guidance to the Embassy and to USEU. 5. (U) Begin Text Pfizer Translation - Registration Regulation Article 9/Temporary Article 1: Article 9- Without prejudice to the provisions of the Decree Law dated 24/06/1995,with no. 551, on the Protection of Patent Rights; a) In abridged applications, the applicant shall not be required to present the results of toxicological and pharmacological tests and clinical trials, provided that one of the following points is proved: 1) The medicinal product shall be mostly similar to a medicinal product which previously registered in Turkey and the marketing registration holder of the original medicinal product shall have consented to the use of the toxicological, pharmacological and/or clinical references contained in the dossier of the original medicinal product for the purpose of evaluating the referred application, 2) Any constituent(s) of the medicinal product shall have a well-established medical use, determined by means of detailed scientific bibliography and with a reasonable efficiency and acceptable level of reliability, 3) The medicinal product shall be essentially similar with a medicinal product which has been registered in accordance with the current legislative provisions and has completed its data exclusivity period. The data exclusivity period called for by this subparagraph, shall apply on the original products for which no generic registration application has been submitted in Turkey until 01/01/2005, among the original products registered for the first time after 01/01/2001 in one of the countries within the Customs Union Area and the original products to be registered for the time after 01/01/2005 in one of the countries of the Customs Union Area and shall be 6 (six) years to begin as of the first registration date in the Customs Union Area and to be limited with the patent period of the relevant molecule in Turkey. However, in the event of a different therapeutical indication, route of administration, dosage being envisaged from those of the medicinal products which have been introduced into the market, it shall be necessary to submit the results of the relevant clinical trials and where necessary the results of toxicological, pharmacological studies. b) With regard to new medicinal products containing recognized constituents, but which have not yet been used in combination for therapeutical purposes, it shall be necessary to present the results of the relevant toxicological and pharmacological tests and clinical trials. However, it shall not be obligatory to present the references pertaining to each constituent. In compliance with subparagraph (2) in item (a) of the first paragraph of this article, in the event of the presentation of bibliographical references based on published data, the applications shall be submitted in accordance with Annex I. In exceptional cases constituting a severe threat for public health, the Ministry may take into consideration the registration applications of generic products, which have been presented upon taking as basis the data pertaining to the toxicological, pharmacological and clinical data published on literature, independent from the provisions set forth in this article. Temporary Article 1- The registration/permit applications submitted before the enforcement of this Regulation, shall be evaluated in accordance with the legislative provisions in force on the date such applications are submitted. With regard to the abridged applications presented in accordance with article 9 of this Regulation of which all provisions except for article 9 shall be enforced on 30/06/2005, the applications submitted in compliance with the application format indicated in the Regulation in force shall be accepted. End Text Pfizer Translation. Edelman
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04