Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05YEREVAN53 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05YEREVAN53 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2005-01-13 12:41:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PHUM AM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L YEREVAN 000053 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN, EUR/ACE, INR E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/12/2015 TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, AM SUBJECT: KOCHARIAN SENDS CONGRATULATIONS TO NEW UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT -- AGAIN Classified By: DCM A.F. Godfrey for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (U) The GOAM announced January 11 that President Robert Kocharian sent a congratulatory message to Ukrainian President-elect Viktor Yushchenko. The news sparked a flurry of media reports about Armenia-Ukraine-Russia relations and re-ignited discussion on the applicability of recent events in Ukraine and Georgia in the current Armenian political theater. The congratulatory letter was reportedly almost identical to the message Kocharian had sent to Ukrainian Prime Minister Victor Yanukovich following the November 21 round of voting. Reports were quick to remind that the GOAM was the only Council of Europe country, other than Russia, to have recognized Yanukovich as the victor in the November 2004 election. GOAM officials once again defended Kocharian on his handling of the issue, saying the decision to recognize Yanukovich relied on cues of Ukraine's Central Election Commission and denied that the move was simply an attempt to please Moscow by supporting the pro-Russia candidate. End summary. -------------------------------- SAME LETTER, DIFFERENT ADDRESSEE -------------------------------- 2. (U) The GOAM announced January 11 that President Robert Kocharian sent a congratulatory message to Ukrainian President-elect Viktor Yushchenko. The text of the letter included standard language and a call for strengthening of relations between the two countries. Most of the Armenia's press smirkingly noted that the congratulatory letter was almost identical to the message Kocharian had sent to Ukrainian Prime Minister Victor Yanukovich following the November 21 round of voting. --------------------------------------------- --- KOCHARIAN - HEEDING THE CEC OR CUES FROM MOSCOW? --------------------------------------------- --- 3. (C) News reports seized on the latest Kocharian letter as an opportunity to remind the public that the GOAM was the only Council of Europe country, other than Russia, to have recognized Yanukovich as the victor of the November 2004 election. Opposition newspapers again suggested that Kocharian's decision to recognize Yushchenko was a move to please official Moscow by quickly supporting the pro-Russia candidate. GOAM officials once again defended Kocharian, however, saying his November decision was based on information received from Ukraine's Central Election Commission and not a political move. (Note: GOAM insiders told us that Kocharian's rush to congratulate Yanukovich was prompted by an urgent personal appeal from Russia's former Prime Minister and Ambassador in Kiev, Viktor Chernomyrdin. End Note.) ---------------------------------- COMMENT: YEREVAN IS STILL NO KIEV ---------------------------------- 4. (C) The news of Kocharian's congratulations of Yushchenko sparked a flurry of media reports about Armenia-Ukraine-Russia relations and re-ignited discussion on the applicability of recent events in Ukraine and Georgia in the current Armenian political theater. Local commentators (and some media outlets abroad) are quick to draw parallels between recent events in Ukraine and Georgia and the political environment in Armenia. But Yerevan is neither Tbilisi nor Kiev, and drastic political change is unlikely in the near future. While Armenian opposition leaders like to think that the public is still outraged over electoral fraud during Armenia's 2003 presidential and parliamentary elections, the mood is nowhere near as electric as it was immediately following the election or during the much-touted "Hot Spring" rallies of April 2004. The key difference remains the absence of a single opposition leader with enough charisma, popular support or an easy-to-understand agenda to unite party leaders in opposing the current government. EVANS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04