US embassy cable - 05BRUSSELS72

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

AUSTRALIANS SEEK COMMON POSITION WITH U.S.ON WCDR AND EU ADDITIONALITY

Identifier: 05BRUSSELS72
Wikileaks: View 05BRUSSELS72 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Brussels
Created: 2005-01-07 12:42:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PREL EAID AS JA CA EUN UN USEU BRUSSELS
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.


 
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRUSSELS 000072 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/07/2015 
TAGS: PREL, EAID, AS, JA, CA, EUN, UN, USEU BRUSSELS 
SUBJECT: AUSTRALIANS SEEK COMMON POSITION WITH U.S.ON WCDR 
AND EU ADDITIONALITY 
 
REF: A. HUIZINGA-CHASE/LUCAS/PEAY E-MAILS 
 
     B. 01/06/05 
 
Classified By: USEU POLOFF TODD HUIZINGA FOR REASONS 1.4 B/D 
 
1. (C) SUMMARY: We met with counterparts from the Australian 
Mission to the EU, at their request, to discuss EU 
additionality and the World Conference on Disaster Reduction 
(WCDR), to be held in Kobe January 18-22.  The Australians 
said Canberra was concerned, in the context of the tsunami 
disaster, about &perceptions that may arise if Australia 
were seen as letting a procedural concern8 such as 
additionality hinder the Kobe conference,s mobilization of 
support for those affected by the tsunami. END SUMMARY. 
 
2. (C) In their January 7 meeting with Poloff, Alison Burrows 
(protect), Minister, and Catherine Dobbin (protect), Third 
Secretary, said the Australian position on additionality 
 
SIPDIS 
remained broadly in agreement with the U.S.  They said that 
Australia was developing a specific stance on the status and 
rights of the European Commission at WCDR, and asked for U.S. 
views.  We told them that the USG,s general views on EU 
additionality, conveyed to the Australians in New York and 
elsewhere, had not changed.  However, we noted USG thinking 
on WCDR is fluid (ref).  We stressed that the U.S. welcomes 
the European Commission,s (EC) active participation at WCDR, 
and added that the EU had not yet responded to our December 
2004 questions on WCDR. 
 
3. (C) Burrows replied that Australia had posed specific 
questions to the EU on WCDR, and was awaiting a response. 
She said that contacts with Japanese officials had given her 
the impression that Japan &was sitting on its hands8 
regarding EU additionality and WCDR, not wanting disputes 
over additionality to cloud the Kobe conference.  Burrows and 
Dobbin, who were asked to speak to us by their Foreign 
Ministry, said Australia would prefer to come to a &common 
position8 on EC participation at WCDR with like-minded 
countries such as the U.S., Japan and Canada.  They said they 
would keep us abreast of developments regarding Australian 
policy, and asked that we do the same. 
 
MCKINLEY 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04