Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05NEWDELHI72 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05NEWDELHI72 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy New Delhi |
| Created: | 2005-01-04 13:08:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV ETTC KNNP TRGY IN NSSP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NEW DELHI 000072 SIPDIS COMMERCE FOR MATT BORMAN, PASS TO NRC E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/02/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, ETTC, KNNP, TRGY, IN, NSSP SUBJECT: INDIAN INITIATIVES TO FURTHER HIGH TECH, BIOTECH, AND NUCLEAR COOPERATION REF: 04 STATE 263394 Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission, Robert O. Blake, Jr., Reasons 1 .4 (B,D). 1. (C) Summary: Despite changes in key USG interlocutors, the GOI hopes to preserve momentum on high-tech trade and other cooperation under the Next Steps in Strategic Partnership (NSSP) umbrella and is looking to Washington for similar signals. In a December 29 meeting with PolCouns and Pol-MilOff, MEA Joint Secretary (Americas) S. Jaishankar outlined an ambitious agenda for the High Tech Cooperation Group (HTCG) focusing on private sector initiatives over the next six months while Commerce U/S Juster's replacement is identified and confirmed. He also suggested the NSSP Implementation Group meet in early February to take advantage of US officials coming to India for other events. Jaishankar underscored the need to expand US-India nuclear cooperation in order to build scientific support for the NSSP process and maintain progress on other NSSP benchmarks. MEA Additional Secretary Meera Shankar echoed these points on January 4, SIPDIS suggesting that US-India cooperation in new areas of nuclear research (she mentioned the ITER fusion project) could be an important catalyst to Indian scientific support for the NSSP quid-pro-quos. End Summary. High-Level High Tech Events in the Works ---------------------------------------- 2. (C) In an December 29 meeting focused on next steps in the US-India strategic relationship, MEA Joint Secretary (Americas) S. Jaishankar emphasized the GOI intention to sustain the positive momentum created by our agreement on Phase 1 of the NSSP. Noting the potential convergence of key HTCG and NSSP players in India in February for AeroIndia and an international life sciences conference, PolCouns asked about GOI plans for leveraging these events. Noting the GOI expectation that it could take several months to nominate and confirm a successor for Commerce Undersecretary Juster, Jaishankar suggested that we should focus the next few months on the private sector side of the HTCG. He indicated, for instance, that an informal meeting of the HTCG defense subcommittee could happen on the margins of AeroIndia, adding that he had already recommended such an event to the Ministry of Defense, although the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) would host it. He likewise expressed interest in mobilizing a private sector event in the area of life sciences hosted by the Ministry of Science's Secretary for Biotech. Need for New Ideas on Nuclear Cooperation to Keep NSSP Moving --------------------------------------------- ---------------- 3. (C) Noting the upcoming visit to India of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Commissioner Merrifield, PolCouns suggested this would be a good opportunity to rebut concern among the Indian scientific establishment about limited cooperation on nuclear issues under the NSSP. As the first among equals in the Indian scientific establishment, Jaishankar explained, Department of Atomic Energy chairman Kakodkar has the ability to set the tone for other agencies. If he feels that India's nuclear sector will not benefit from the NSSP, Jaishankar continued, Kakodkar could retard progress in the other areas of NSSP cooperation (export controls, defense research and space). With this in mind, Jaishankar appealed for a more liberal interpretation of nuclear safety collaboration in Phase II, noting that this issue was also raised in the November meeting between Foreign Secretary Saran and NSA Rice. SIPDIS 4. (C) Jaishankar remarked on the sense among some in the GOI that India's desires for expanding cooperation with the US on nuclear safety are being "brushed off" by the Department, as well as general skepticism that progress on the later phases of the NSSP will be hampered by "nit-picky" lawyers. "We should be picking up momentum right now, not just cruising along," Jaishankar stated. Echoing U/S Juster, PolCouns argued that "progress begets progress," and urged that the Indian side to avoid creating the impression that New Delhi was trying to renegotiate the NSSP, but rather take tangible steps to implement it. Jaishanker nodded his head in agreement, but also flagged the political problem he faces from the Indian nuclear establishment. 5. (C) We heard a similar message in a January 4 meeting with our other key NSSP interlocutor, MEA Additional Secretary Meera Shankar. Responding to PolCouns' description of the Washington desire to maintain forward momentum on the NSSP, Shankar warned that the Indian nuclear establishment had become a real obstacle to steps such as NSG adherence and stronger export controls. The scientific community, she claimed, believes that nothing has really changed in our nuclear relationship, and uses this view to argue that India should not change its own policies. This dynamic, she continued, helps to explain the strong GOI push for a more flexible US interpretation of matters such as the NSG safety exception. Responding to PolCouns warning that some areas of nuclear cooperation will remain "a bridge too far," she suggested that cooperation in areas not restricted by the NSG lists might help to change the view of NSSP among India's atomic establishment. For instance, she suggested that US support for India's involvement in the ITER fusion project (as proposed at the recent EU-India summit) would be an important step forward. Elaborating on this theme, she emphasized the Indian potential to contribute to ITER, and asked whether a letter to this effect from the GOI to DOE would be helpful. PolCouns undertook to seek guidance on this topic. Scheduling the Next NSSP Meeting -------------------------------- 6. (C) With both Shankar and Jaishankar, PolCouns pressed the Indians for documentation about progress on India's commitments under Phase II of the NSSP. Since most Phase II steps involve revising laws and regulations, it serves India's interests to get the texts of these to us early. Jaishankar responded that early US identification of a date for the next meeting of the NSSP Implementation Group would enable him to start pressing the GOI bureaucracy to generate the required legislation and related documentation. He specifically suggested that the next implementation group meeting be set for mid-February in Delhi in conjunction with the AeroIndia and the life sciences conference -- adding that "with NSSP nothing gets decided until a meeting is fixed." MULFORD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04