US embassy cable - 04MANAMA1914

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ACCEPTS TERROR SUSPECT CASE

Identifier: 04MANAMA1914
Wikileaks: View 04MANAMA1914 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Manama
Created: 2004-12-21 15:17:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PTER ASEC PREL BA
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

211517Z Dec 04
C O N F I D E N T I A L MANAMA 001914 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/21/2014 
TAGS: PTER, ASEC, PREL, BA 
SUBJECT: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ACCEPTS TERROR SUSPECT CASE 
 
REF: MANAMA 1834 
 
Classified By: Ambassador William T. Monroe.  Reason: 1.4 (B)(D) 
 
1. (C) As expected, Bahrain's Criminal Court decided on 
December 20 to temporarily suspend its hearing on the case 
against four terrorist suspects, pending a decision by 
Constitutional Court on the constitutionality of article 157 
of the penal code under which the four are charged.  The 
decision was a formality once the suspects' defense lawyers 
demonstrated to the Criminal Court judge that the 
Constitutional Court had accepted the case.  The head of the 
Constitutional Court told the Ambassador December 21 that he 
has five cases already on his docket, and he expects the case 
to be heard in the next two to three months.  In the 
meantime, the suspects remain under surveillance. 
 
2. (C) The Ambassador on December 20 discussed the 
constitutional case with the President of the Court of 
Cassation (Supreme Court) Shaikh Khalifa bin Rashid Al 
Khalifa, who said that the question of the constitutionality 
of the case is not frivolous.  He said that the courts in 
Cairo had considered a similar law in a criminal case, and 
viewed it unconstitutional, while in Kuwait the 
constitutionality of the law had been upheld.  Basically, he 
said, the law punishes people who are involved in the 
planning of a crime, whether or not they actual carry out the 
plan.  In purely criminal cases, he said, that can be 
problematic, especially in terms of the evidence.  He 
acknowledged that planning for a terrorist crime is something 
different, and is something that countries -- not just 
Bahrain -- are currently grappling with. 
MONROE 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04