Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04LJUBLJANA1107 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04LJUBLJANA1107 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ljubljana |
| Created: | 2004-12-14 07:27:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PINR SI OSCE RU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 001107 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/RPM AND EUR/NCE E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/12/2014 TAGS: PREL, PINR, SI, OSCE, RU SUBJECT: SLOVENIA: FOMIN RUPEL AND USOSCE AMB MINIKES DISCUSS OSCE PRIORITIES Classified By: Chief of Mission Thomas B. Robertson for reasons 1.4(b) and (d). 1. (C) SUMMARY: In a 10 December meeting with COM and USOSCE Ambassador Stephan Minikes, FoMin Rupel set out Slovenian priorities for its OSCE CiO year, indicating a special interest in dealing with issues in Southeastern Europe. Discussion focused on Ukraine and on the need to engage the Russians in order to avoid a train wreck within the OSCE on its core values and activities. Minikes urged Rupel to play a strong leadership role as CiO. He suggested active early engagement on the Eminent Persons initiative and later told MFA OSCE Task Force Head Aleksander Gerzina that the U.S. would inform the Slovenes soon of possible U.S. candidates. Minikes told Rupel the U.S. would not support the candidacy of either the Swiss or Albanian SecGen candidates if the French could not get consensus on their candidate, whom the U.S. supports. Gerzina later replied that Slovenia would begin a new search for a SecGen in January if no resolution was found in the next few weeks. Rupel made a plug for an early visit by PM Janez Jansa to Washington, in addition to a visit Rupel would like to make by February to see the Secretary. On scales of contribution, Minikes told Rupel the Russian proposal was unacceptable, telling Gerzina later that the U.S. could live with Canadian or Bulgarian proposals. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) On 10 December, COM and USOSCE Ambassador Stephan Minikes met with Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel to discuss the OSCE Ministerial in Sofia and Slovenia's priorities for its OSCE Chairmanship-in-Office (CiO) in 2005. Rupel was accompanied by MFA OSCE Task Force Director Aleksander Gerzina, Task Force Members Simona Leskovar and Rok Srakar, Rupel's Chef de Cabinet Matej Marn and staffer Masa Siftar. COM and Minikes were accompanied by EUR/RPM OSCE Coordinator Greta Holtz and Pol-Miloff. Originally scheduled as a 20 minute courtesy call, the meeting lasted approximately 75 minutes as Rupel and Minikes engaged in a lively exchange of views. Minikes later met for a two-hour-plus working lunch with Gerzina and eight members of the MFA OSCE Task Force. Holtz, Pol/Econ Chief and Pol-Miloff accompanied Minikes to the working lunch. RUPEL: "PREPARED TO LEAD WITH UTMOST SERIOUSNESS" --------------------------------------------- ---- 3. (C) Stressing the "utmost seriousness" with which Slovenia intends to lead the OSCE, Rupel described "four clusters of problems" the Slovenes saw as priorities: Central Asia, the Caucasus, Eastern Europe and Southeastern Europe (SEE). Rupel said Slovenia was "most interested in dealing with problems in the vicinity," i.e. SEE, in particular Kosovo. Nonetheless, he noted that other high-profile issues such as Ukraine would present challenges as well. 4. (C) Rupel contrasted the relative success at NATO on issues including communique language on Ukraine with the "unfortunate confrontation" with the Russians at the OSCE Ministerial on many issues, especially Ukraine. Quoting Russian FoMin Lavrov as saying, "at NATO we can reach compromise and consensus, but at OSCE we cannot," Rupel pledged to try to correct the problem. He said Russian Deputy FoMin Chizhov would visit Ljubljana in early January, and Rupel will travel to Moscow in February. Clearly stating that the problems in Sofia were "Russia's fault," Rupel characterized relations with the Russians as "good compared to the past." He said he intended to "work with them as much as possible without sacrificing the principles of the OSCE, NATO and the EU." Rupel concluded that he wished to improve the way decisions were reached within the OSCE and break a "bad tradition" of starting negotiations too late for the next OSCE ministerial declaration. MINIKES: ENGAGING THE RUSSIANS ------------------------------ 5. (C) Minikes agreed with Rupel's approach and told Rupel that the NATO declaration was a "piece of cake" compared to what the OSCE had tried to accomplish in Sofia. Minikes offered Rupel the full support of the U.S., saying "almost everyone would like you to succeed, but their (the Russians') definition of success may be different than ours." Rupel replied, "they've come a long way," prompting Minikes to remind him to "look at what they do and not at what they say." Minikes told Rupel he was pleased with Rupel's emphasis on "starting early" and keeping the end goal in sight. ASSESSING THE RUSSIANS ---------------------- 6. (C) Rupel characterized his interactions with the Russian delegation at Sofia. Despite a history of earlier interactions with former FoMin Ivanov, whom he called "more accessible and less dogmatic," Rupel said that "with Lavrov (in Sofia) it was all formulae." Rupel had "some reservations" about Lavrov. He expressed frustration with Chizhov, who had shown "a lot of bonhomie" when working for Ivanov but who had become more like Lavrov, "just a little worse" in Sofia. Minikes said that identifying an interlocutor among the Russians was problematic, given that Borodavkin was "on a short leash" and Azimov had "little imagination." Nonetheless, he praised Alexander Grushko as being very capable, to which Rupel agreed. THE TOLERANCE AGENDA/EMINENT PERSONS ------------------------------------ 7. (C) Minikes complimented Rupel's remarks at the Sofia ministerial, in particular on the need for OSCE to engage not just "east of Vienna." Rupel replied that this remark was a concession to the CIS and a reaction to the Astana statement. Minikes also urged Rupel to focus on the Eminent Persons initiative. At the working lunch, Minikes told Gerzina the U.S. would explore U.S. candidates for the panel and forward names to Rupel. He urged Slovenia to be aggressive in its pursuit of a qualified panel, stressing that simply sending out a letter to OSCE Ambassadors would not suffice. The panel should focus not on how the OSCE should do its job, Minikes further stressed, but where and what the OSCE's job should be. OSCE needed to find its "copetitive advantage," and the panel could help dothis. OSCE: THE "HALFWAY HOUSE" ON THE ROAD TO DMOCRACY --------------------------------------------- ---- 8. (C) Ruminating on the role of theOSCE in contrast o NATO and the EU, Rupel descrbed the OSCE as the "halfway house" for countrie making the transition to western-style democracis. The OSCE must try to "seduce these countries" without shared NATO and EU values into democracy,he said. Rupel invoked his background as a socioogist as he described the importance of promoting universal or European standards over local standards on human rights and democratization. He stressed that local standards cannot be allowed to prevail "when human rights and human lives are in question." Minikes urged Rupel to engage in such a conversation with Lavrov; however, Rupel replied, "he's tougher than that." Minikes then drove home the importance of engaging the Russians early and often. DEEPENING THE BILATERAL RELATIONSHIP: JANSA TO WASHINGTON? --------------------------------------------- ------------- 9. (C) In response to Minikes's suggestion that Rupel visit the Secretary no later than February, Rupel said he would be very eager to pay such a visit, but his priority was to arrange for PM Jansa to visit Washington. Rupel said the GoS wants to "re-establish the good relations... the deeply friendly relations" that it had with Washington in the past. Rupel said relations with the U.S. had "not been spoiled, but dented" in the last couple years. SECRETARY GENERAL: STARTING THE SEARCH ANEW? SIPDIS -------------------------------------------- 10. (C) Minikes told Rupel that the U.S. would not support the nomination of Stoudemann for OSCE SecGen, saying "we are solidly behind de Brichambaud." Rupel asked if the U.S. position was negotiable, and Minikes answered, "No." Minikes said that, at this point, Chirac would need to call Putin if the nomination was to be pushed forward. Rupel noted that Lavrov had said Russia would not support an EU candidate for SecGen. Minikes countered that a Chirac-Putin phone call could "go a long way." Later at the working lunch, Gerzina told Minikes that Slovenia would be prepared to start a new search for a SecGen soon after 01 January if there was no compromise in the next few weeks. Gerzina said that support for the Albanian candidate was growing within SEE but that Chizhov had told him the Russians considered Stoudemann to be the best choice. Minikes urged the Slovenes to stay in close touch with the French Ambassador to the OSCE, saying "give this (the French candidate) a chance." SCALES OF CONTRIBUTION ---------------------- 11. (C) Rupel straightforwardly asked Minikes, "what should we do about (scales of contribution)?" Minikes called the Russian solution "patently ridiculous" and said it would skew the political dynamics of the OSCE to have the U.S. or any one country contributing such a high percentage of the budget. Later at the working lunch, Minikes told participants that the U.S. could live with either a recent Canadian proposal or either of the two Bulgarian proposals, provided there was no "linkage" by the Russians on other issues. When Gerzina said linkage seemed to be on the Russian agenda, Minikes urged the GoS to prevail upon its colleagues within the EU to help "surround Russia" by upping their contributions slightly. MINIKES: THE NEED FOR SLOVENIAN LEADERSHIP ------------------------------------------ 12. (C) Minikes concluded the meeting by urging Rupel to exercise strong leadership in his role as OSCE Chairman. He suggested arranging for an early visit to Moldova and Georgia, along with the assignment of a special representative to handle the frozen conflicts in the Caucasus. Suggesting the importance to Rupel of doing "important things," Minikes said the OSCE role in Afghanistan was important, the OSCE's current role in Ukraine is important and that a role for the OSCE in Iraq and Palestine will be important, as well. Rupel said that Iraq was "not in the center" of Slovenia's agenda for the OSCE, but that Palestine was a necessary part of OSCE's engagement. When Minikes pointed out that the Iraqi Central Election Commission had invited the OSCE to contribute by sending election monitors, Rupel said he had received conflicting information about the OSCE in Iraq from the UN. Minikes handed over a copy of the invitation letter from the Iraqi Election Commission and urged engagement. WORKING LUNCH: CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON ENGAGING RUSSIA --------------------------------------------- ------- 13. (C) Engagement with Russia remained the central theme at the working lunch with nine of the MFA's twelve OSCE Task Force members. Gerzina stressed that Slovenia is "talking to Russia all the time in a permanent dialogue." He agreed with Minikes that Russia should not be allowed to go "forum shopping" among the OSCE, NATO and the EU. Following his earlier meeting, Minikes said Rupel is "clearly an intelligent man with ideas" and underscored the USG's pledge to "work hard to make sure (Slovenia) is never surprised" during its OSCE Chairmanship. Minikes concluded the meeting by touching in brief detail on the range of USG positions on virtually all open OSCE issues. The OSCE Task Force members were very appreciative of his time and clearly welcomed his input. COMMENT ------- 14. (C) Rupel was very engaged and well briefed in his meeting with Minikes, which lasted nearly an hour longer than the scheduled 20 minutes. During the meeting Rupel clearly demonstrated his willingness to seek out and listen to U.S. advice on matters of importance within the OSCE. This stance is yet another example of the new Jansa-led GoS desire to "deepen" relations with the U.S., a phrase that is quickly becoming the standard opening line as COM calls on the newly confirmed cabinet ministers. While Rupel and Gerzina professed to agree with Minikes's views on engaging the Russians, we think that hearing the message directly from Amb. Minikes in the lead up to the Slovenian Chairmanship will help buttress the Slovenes' resolve. Rupel will try to deal with the Russians diplomatically. His comments to COM and Minikes show that he knows what kind of leadership will be required, though, for the Slovenes to make the most of what may be a contentious year within the OSCE. He and his team also made it clear that the support of the U.S. within the OSCE will be extremely important to the GoS as CiO. END COMMENT 15. (U) EUR/RPM OSCE Coordinator Greta Holtz cleared this cable. Amb. Minikes did not have an opportunity to clear this cable before his departure from Ljubljana. ROBERTSON NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04