Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TAIPEI3859 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TAIPEI3859 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2004-12-07 06:48:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO TW Cross Strait Politics Cross Strait Economics Foreign Policy |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003859 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ROBERT PALLADINO DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, TW, Cross Strait Politics, Cross Strait Economics, Foreign Policy SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: TAIWAN'S ECONOMIC PROSPECT, U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 1. Taiwan's Economic Prospect "Do Not Use [Reasons Like Taiwan's] Industry Outflow and Pro-China Attitude to Harm Taiwan's Credit Rating Again" The pro-independence "Liberty Times" editorialized (12/7): "It is regretful that while China's political and military threats have done serious damage to Taiwan already, Beijing is still using means like blocking Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization or signing free trade agreements [with other countries] to isolate Taiwan. Under such circumstances, some people in Taiwan not only forget that they should first reflect on themselves, but instead, some pro-China people or even some government officials try to promote policies that will strengthen exchanges with China, thus enabling China to have more channels to hurt Taiwan. If Taiwan wants to improve its credit rating, it should first abandon these incorrect policies and ideas, so that the island can restore its confidence and strive to change Taiwan's credit rating back to `normal.'" 2. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations "U.S. Connivance with Taiwan Independence Is Dangerous" The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" commented in an editorial (12/7): "The discrepancy [between how Washington views Taiwan and how Taiwan people look at the island] suggests American hypocrisy and disrespect for the 1918 Wilsonian principle of self-determination. "Denying the ROC as a sovereign state has helped legitimize Communist China's demand of Taiwan's return to its fold and encouraged separatists on the island to pursue non-Chinese statehood. The two conflicting goals promise a military showdown to break the status quo sooner or later. "Washington doesn't want to be dragged into a war with China over Taiwan, but it is moving toward that eventuality by conniving at President Chen's insistence on more trappings of statehood. "While officially opposed to independence referendums, the U.S. virtually has given Chen a free hand to provoke China and whip up separatist sentiments. In return, Washington only wants Taiwan to pay more and buy more advanced weaponry to beef up defense against mainland threats, starting an arms race between `a mosquito and an elephant.' "Apparently, Washington's China-Taiwan policy aims only at coping with the effect of the problem, not eradicating the cause. As in soliciting Chinese collaboration in the anti-terrorist enterprise, the U.S. should have pressured Beijing to be more accommodating to Taiwan's wishes, and Taipei, less resistant to the `one China' principle. . "The rising tension in the strait has been prompted by the Chen administration's rejection of the `one China' principle, which is also a direct challenge to Washington's long-standing `one China' policy. But the U.S. has also chosen to ignore it, as if defense cooperation between the protector and the protected could be built on policy contradictions. "And all Washington has done to check Chen's separatist moves is holding him accountable by reciting in public his `five-no' pledge of no independence plebiscite enshrined in his 2000 and 2004 inauguration addresses. But the Chen pledge only amounts to `no change in the status quo through referendums during his tenure.' He never promised to respect the U.S. `one China' policy nor refrain from pushing separatist movements. "No wonder Taiwan's independence fundamentalists view the U.S. `one China' pronouncements as more lip service to placate Beijing. And the U.S. language of `no support for' Taiwan independence is misinterpreted as `not opposed to' it. Also no wonder Beijing has become increasingly suspicious about Washington's intentions, and is busy making preparations `to recover the island at all cost,' including a confrontation with the U.S. "With reckless leaders like [President] Chen [Shui- bian] and [former President] Lee [Teng-hui], a confusing mentor and protector like the U.S., and a paranoid enemy like Beijing, can Taiwan expect to be left alone in peace?" PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04