Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ADANA153 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ADANA153 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Consulate Adana |
| Created: | 2004-12-06 09:42:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON ETRD MARR MCAP EAGR EPET EWWT TU ADANA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ADANA 000153 SIPDIS SENSITIVE EB PASS TDA E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, ETRD, MARR, MCAP, EAGR, EPET, EWWT, TU, ADANA SUBJECT: MERSIN PORT FACING NEED FOR CHANGE 1.(SBU) Summary: AMCON ADANA PO visited Mersin on November 24, visiting the state-run Mersin Port , nearby free zone and its private port and the Chamber of Marine. The port, while quite profitable for the GOT, sees capacity constraints in the near future and badly needs modernization. The Free Zone is also full and mulling how to react to continuing local demand for access to its tax-free status even in the face of potentially losing that tax concession should Turkey start EU accession talks. The Chamber of Marine is busy planning to start a new shipyard and drydock business in western Mersin province, but faces local zoning hurdles at the moment. They project high demand for their planned maintenance and repair services as well as for their subsequent shipbuilding capacity as Istanbul's comparable services reportedly have been saturated. End Summary. 2.(SBU) AMCON ADANA PO visited Mersin on November 24, visiting the state-run Mersin Port. According to the Port director and the Chamber of Marine, the Port, run by the State Board for Ports and Railroads, netted almost USD 50 million for the GOT in 2003 and is projected to have similar results this year. Nevertheless, the absence of any reinvestment in the extremely busy port, whose container capacity, pier access, and available draft is unique in the northeastern Mediterranean was striking. The port was brimming with containers, but the Port Authority requirement that the Marine Agencies fully employ its inefficient state-employed longshoremen on all cargo handling before their own private teams' use has resulted in combinations of private and State longshoremen services for almost each ship who invariably work at different speeds and with different levels of capacity and skill. Some Marine agents have even gone so far as to pay the Port Authority for its longshoremen and still do all unloading with its private workforce just to streamline cargo handling. 3.(SBU) Cargo handling equipment is also lagging demand even though the Port Authority is investing in this area to try to match demand. Currently there are two GOT-owned standard cargo container handling gantries and one mobile, privately-owned similar gantry operated privately on a Port Authority concession. The Port Authority currently is assembling two post-PANAMAX cargo container handling gantries of Irish manufacture with a projected completion date of February 2005. Shipping agents welcome the new capacity cranes' acquisition, but note that they occasionally are turning away standard size business because of under- capacity in that category and nagging concerns about the maintenance on the two GOT-owned gantries, in effect limiting their cargo handling capacity. 4.(SBU) Additionally, all containers in the almost full container yard are tracked by hand. Asked about a GPS- transponder system's future viability and the sort automated tracking which is common in many world container shipyards, the Port Director said that the Port Authority was working on automating its billing department, but that any other investment was not covered in the State budget. The Port Director mentioned as well that he had discussed port automation with Hamburg Port Authority representatives in the recent past, but nothing came of the discussion. There also is no insurance or cargo-handling liability system to cover damages to cargo while in on/off-loading status. Both the Chamber of Marine and nearby small private Free Zone Port authority found these shortcomings striking and at odds with standard commercial practice. The only manner to seek redress for damage in cargo handling now is to sue the GOT, which Marine Agents claim that they do regularly, but say that eventual damages paid only reflect a portion of prevailing commercial liability rates and come usually only after very lengthy delays and litigation fees. Import/ Export Commodities? 5.(SBU) According to the Chamber of Marine monthly reports, chief Mersin Port exports (in declining quantities) are cement, general cargo, petroleum products, marble and other minerals, legumes, foodstuffs, assorted chemicals, sodium carbonate, textiles and glass. Seasonally, cereals are also a major export. The port primarily imports petroleum products, chemicals, general cargo, foodstuffs and frozen meat, textiles and cotton. Seasonally it also imports cereals. Petroleum and chemicals account for two-thirds of import trade. Export trade is far more diverse. In the last 19 months petroleum trade, although still mainly for domestic consumption, has been augmented by humanitarian petroleum deliveries bound for Iraq, which arrive in Turkey both at Mersin and nearby Iskenderun ports. Privatizing the Port? 6.(SBU) In discussions with Chamber of Marine, local shipping agents and the Free Zone Director, it became clear that there is local interest in buying the port which has sufficient capital, but these potential private operators have been frustrated by shifting GOT terms of reference for privatization offers in the last two years and what they consider to be excessively lofty GOT estimates of the port's current privatized value. A Chamber of Marine contact said that a group of local shipping agents last year had offered the only bid in response to a privatization tender, but had heard informally that it was only 65% of what the GOT expected and the tender had been cancelled. A senior Mersin Free Zone authority observed that the GOT apparently views the profitable port as a major revenue source for the maintenance and operation of its money-losing southern Antalya-Adana-Gaziantep-Ankara "Tee" line and that the State Board for Ports and Railroads calculated its estimated privatization value for the port more in terms of the capital needed to return the railroad network to a neutral budget impact than on the port's actual value. He also said that almost monopoly position of the port in the northeastern Mediterranean basin retarded competition and distorted the influence of competitive enterprise factors in management decisions. Port's projected future? 7.(SBU) Shipping agents and the Port Authority report 15% annual increases in demand for port services in the last three years and say that the rising demand is linked to increasing domestic consumption and saturation of ports in Istanbul and Izmir. They note that were regional Turkish trade, such as with Iraq for whom they see Mersin as the natural "northern port," to increase the port could not meet that demand. The Chamber of Marine reports that in late 2003/early 2004 the Spanish Government's Development Board produced a 3-5 year, approximately USD 500 million port expansion feasibility proposal, but that it remains without financing or GOT endorsement. One local contact said that the "GOT is waiting for EU (regional development) funds to be the answer to this issue." Another contact noted that a Brazilian consortium had expressed interest in the port expansion project as well, but that financing was just as unclear for that proposal. 8.(SBU) PO also toured the newly-expanded and renovated NATO pier within the Mersin Port, which is projected to be completed in January 2005. It abuts the joint Turkish Navy/Coast Guard yard and partially separates the Port of Mersin from the small Mersin Free Zone port. It has a pier, container handling yard, fuel handling capacity and capability to host a standard container size gantry. It was unclear whether a dedicated standard container gantry would handle NATO-related cargo or the port's privately-leased mobile gantry would do so. Shipping agents and the Chamber of Marine said that informal suggestions that the Port of Mersin expand into the Turkish Navy/Coast Guard yard, which they contend could be relocated to an under-utilized existing port in Tasucu, in western Mersin province, "have gone no where. The Navy is not interested in moving." New private shipyard in Tasucu in works 9.(SBU) Meanwhile, a group of investors drawn from the Chamber of Marine under the AKTER consortium umbrella is busy planning to start a new shipyard and drydock business in Tasucu in western Mersin province, within an existing breakwater and alongside the site of an existing NATO pier and small fishing port. The group says that it has raised the required USD 14-16 million in capital, but it currently facing "local zoning problems" delaying the start of the first phase of construction, which would put in operation two medium-size drydocks and a graving dock for repair and maintenance work. They are very confident both about the demand for the repair and maintenance services that they plan to offer and the second phase shipyard for "regional cargo and freighters" that they also plan to offer. They report that there is so much regional demand for new cargo hulls that Istanbul-based companies already have contacted them with offers of USD 1-2 million each for the shipyard's accelerated construction if they can have guaranteed priority places in the yard's future construction schedule. The consortium projects that the dry docks and shipyard eventually would employ 350 directly and would spark creation of three to five thousand additional, indirect jobs related to port services work. Mersin Free Zone is at capacity and pondering future in EU 10.(SBU) The Free Zone is also full and mulling how to react to continuing local demand for access to its tax-free status even in the face of potentially losing that tax concession should Turkey start EU accession talks. They say that only Shannon Airport and the Madiera Islands will continue to enjoy some sort of declining tax-free status within the EU framework and efforts to get the GOT to include such a construction for Turkish free zones has borne little fruit to date. Their main exports are finished clothing for EU markets, regional banking transactions for most of Turkey's major bank outlets, and food products, such as fruit and frozen foods, including U.S. poultry and Latin American bananas for Middle East markets, including Iraq. They also export Turkish citrus to the EU market. The Free Zone boasts the only pier-side cold storage, at 6,500 square meters, in the Eastern Mediterranean basin. Its operator hopes to expand that facility another 1,000 square feet in 2005. 11.(SBU) Comment: There seems real potential for the Mersin port, if privatized, to be a much more efficient and very profitable enterprise. If the port is to continue to meet rising commercial demand, let alone provide a viable outlet for increase transshipment to Iraq, major infrastructure investment will be required soon. GOT financing seems unlikely at this juncture. Perhaps TDA would be interested in examining the potential project more closely. PO was left with the impression that the AKTER group might welcome a foreign partner with port/shipyard operation expertise to help round out its consortium. This may involve a several million dollar capital investment as well by the potential foreign partner. End Comment. 12.(U) Baghdad minimize considered. REID
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04