Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04PRETORIA5223 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04PRETORIA5223 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Pretoria |
| Created: | 2004-12-02 05:03:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | EAGR ETRD TSPL SENV ECON SF |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 005223 SIPDIS STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT/DMALAC, JBOBO STATE ALSO FOR AF/S, AF/EPS, OES/STC USDA FOR FAS/ICD AND ITP/SIMMONS PLS PASS USAID FOR EGAT/AG E.O. 12948: N/A TAGS: EAGR, ETRD, TSPL, SENV, ECON, SF SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT STANDS UP TO ACTIVISTS ON BIOTECH STANCE 1. Following the recent passage of a World Conservation Union resolution recommending a moratorium on the further release of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), South African anti-GMO activist groups Biowatch and African Centre for Biosafety blasted the Government of South Africa for its failure to support the resolution, claiming the government was kowtowing to multinational biotechnology corporations. 2. Local media quoted Director General of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Dr. Crispian Olver's explanation of the government's position: "The government could not support the call because it was not properly phrased or thought through. We want the IUCN to focus on building up a scientific base. Making rash calls like this undermines the IUCN's credibility." 3. Comment. The SAG speaks from experience. It has a national biotech strategy and science-based biosafety regime in place, and has approved several varieties of genetically engineered commodities for commercial planting in South Africa. The government also supports significant programs in biotech research, development and commercialization. Success of a locally-developed product would go a long way towards quelling the anti-GMO lobby's protests, which center on the dominance of multinational corporations in plant biotechnology. FRAZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04