Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TAIPEI3793 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TAIPEI3793 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2004-11-30 05:58:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO TW Cross Strait Politics Foreign Policy Domestic Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003793 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ROBERT PALLADINO DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, TW, Cross Strait Politics, Foreign Policy, Domestic Politics SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS, UKRAINE ELECTIONS 1. U.S.-Taiwan Relations "U.S. Continues Two-pronged Policy" Associate professor Yu Pen-li of the Graduate Institute of American Studies, Tamkang University, said in the pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" (11/29): ". In the future, the new US government will face several new diplomatic challenges, such as the reconstruction of Iraq, the Israeli-Palestine situation following the death of Palestinian president Yasser Arafat and the North Korean nuclear issue. Doubtless they would be glad to see stability in the Taiwan Strait and the Asia-Pacific region so that they can concentrate on these other issues. ". Following this logic, China will become its [i.e. Washington's] most important partner when it comes to global anti-terrorism and anti-proliferation efforts. Based on a realistic appraisal of the international political situation, the members of the Vulcan group will expand cooperation with China and downplay differences of opinion. "In other words, if the Vulcans want to see China as a diplomatic and strategic partner in the 21st century, it would be impossible for them to oppose Beijing over the question of Taiwan. "Based on Washington's objective of strategic balance in the Asia-Pacific region, stability in the Taiwan Strait will be an important pillar of US security, and Taiwan will be key in supporting this strategic balance. From this perspective, Bush's new team will not rashly abandon Taiwan, and the US is unwilling to tie any other issue to its arms sales to Taiwan. "But this support for Taiwan is not a blank check for Taiwan to use any which way. Although Bush didn't repeat the statements Powell made at a press conference in Beijing while meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao at the APEC summit in Chile, this doesn't mean that the Powell effect has dissipated. The US leaders' emphasis on a consistent cross-strait policy seems to mean that the US will continue its clear, two-pronged policy. China should not take armed action, and Taiwan should not declare independence. "In other words, the most important goal of US cross- strait policy is still to maintain the status quo, as defined by the US. "If Taiwan's government continues to misjudge the international situation, and US statements lead them to believe that the storm following Powell's statement has blown out, it may continue to move toward independence by, for example, holding a Taiwan independence referendum, or amending the law to allow changing the national emblem. This may cause the situation in the Taiwan Strait to deteriorate and maybe even give rise to a fourth cross-strait crisis. "In future, it is possible that Washington will issue a fourth communiqu with Beijing, to avert a crisis and guarantee stability in the Taiwan Strait and in East Asia. A fourth communiqu could clearly state that Taiwan does not enjoy sovereignty and that the US opposes Taiwan's independence, and even change the tactic of `pushing for dialogue' to `pushing for unification' in order to restrain Taiwan's actions. This could be even more harmful to Taiwan. "For the sake of national interest, the most urgent task for Taiwan's government is to show restraint, strive for cross-strait stability, rebuild mutual trust between Taiwan and the US and put the US-Taiwan relationship back on track. This is the only way that the nation can continue to exist and develop." 2. Ukraine Elections "Is Taiwan More Like the United States or Ukraine?" Deputy Editor-in-Chief Kuo Chen-lung noted in the centrist, pro-status quo "China Times" (11/30): "Taiwan's democratic development, though characterized d by its local color, is not really unique. Other countries' development models can often be used for comparison, and recently, the development models of the United States and of Ukraine are most frequently referred to. . "[U.S.] President George W. Bush did not win his re- election by adopting a middle-of-the-road route but by locating those Christian voters who have rigid ideology. In other words, the neo-conservatism that prevailed in Bush's first term did not dissipate or alter because of the unprecedented close [presidential] elections. Rather, the conservative trend will be even more reinforced during Bush's second term because Bush has identified those fundamentalist voters as his `basic supporters.' Judged from this perspective, Taiwan's DPP is more like the current Republicans. . "But in the eyes of the Taiwan people, what's more stirring is to look at the election dispute in Ukraine. . "People cannot help but wonder what would have happened if some of the key political interactions in Ukraine had taken place in Taiwan?" "First, [in Ukraine,] the opposition congressmen met by themselves and determined that the results of the presidential election were invalid. This move is a perfect demonstration of public opinion and Congress happens to be the institution that has absolute authority to do so when there is contention concerning the presidency of a nation. What if the Pan-Blue camp, which held a majority of seats in the Legislative Yuan, called for an extraordinary session on March 20 and passed a resolution that nullified the president election results? "Second, Ukraine's defense minister issued a statement saying he did not mobilize any troops and he did not intend to upgrade the alert level of the country. People saw such a move as [signifying that] the Ukraine military was holding a neutral position . and knew that the military would not step in even if there were a riot. What would have happened if the then Taiwan Defense Minister Tang Yiau-ming had not claimed he was sick and stayed in the hospital and had instead spoken in public that the military will act according to the constitution and would stay neutral before the presidential election result is ascertained? "Third, even though Ukraine's central election commission announced the ballot-counting results, the opposition faction demanded straight away that the country's supreme court stop the central election commission from making a formal announcement about the president-elect, and the supreme court immediately agreed to review the dispute case. . What would have happened if the Pan-Blue camp in Taiwan had filed the lawsuit regarding the controversial presidential election at the Grand Justices meeting instead of at the Taiwan High Court and had demanded that the Central Election Commission refrain from announcing [Chen Shui- bian] as the president-elect?" PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04