Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TAIPEI3708 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TAIPEI3708 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2004-11-19 07:28:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO TW Foreign Policy Cross Strait Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003708 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ROBERT PALLADINO DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, TW, Foreign Policy, Cross Strait Politics SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: RICE NOMINATION AND WASHINGTON'S CROSS-STRAIT POLICY A) "United States' New Diplomatic Team and Future Changes in Cross-Strait Relations" The centrist, pro-status quo "China Times" observed in an editorial (11/19): ". Will President George W. Bush's policy during his second term be favorable for Taiwan? While commenting on Bush's nomination of Condoleezza Rice as the new Secretary of State, many people believe that there SIPDIS should not be many changes [in Bush's policy]. But an in-depth study would show that Rice's personal traits as a realist would prevail over her personal traits as an idealist and the role Rice will play as the Secretary of State will also differ from her role as SIPDIS the National Security Advisor. "It is generally believed that religious conservatism will dictate Bush's second term. Being a devout Christian herself, Rice also received academic training in international politics during the Cold War era, so she is clearly aware of the importance of strategic reality. Given the fact that the United States already has a lot of issues that need to be resolved, including the Israeli-Palestinian situation, the aftermath of the war in Iraq, and the crisis on the Korean Peninsula, there is really no need for Washington to confront China just for the sake of advocating democratic and moral values. . "When it comes to Taiwan, [it is evident that] Beijing has put the focus of all its foreign relations on preventing Taiwan independence. Such a development overlaps with the United States' cross-Strait policy for the next four years. Learning from its experience over the past two years, the Bush administration must make sure that its mechanism `to control the rise of tension' [across the Taiwan Strait] will function accordingly. As the real policy planner for Washington's policy that `neither side of the Taiwan Strait can unilaterally change the status quo,' Rice will surely act very cautiously in implementing the policy, [and] not allow the actions of one side to provoke the other side to take action unfavorable [to the status quo]. We must say this in a very candid manner: in the next four years, [Washington's] pressure will likely fall on the Taiwan side, and the pressure will increase as Taiwan pushes for a new constitution. ." B) "Bush Needs Stability in Asia" The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" editorialized (11/19): ". It is generally believed that, under Rice's leadership, the new decision-making team will reshuffle the State Department to eliminate opposition and carry out Bush's hawkish policies. "At the moment, Rice should review the State Department's China policy and handle multilateral relations in East Asia with caution. Moreover, she should adjust the methods employed by Powell, who has made excessive concessions to China over the past six months, and resume the global strategic arrangement adopted at the beginning of Bush's first term. . "An important goal for Bush in reshuffling his administration would be to resolve long-standing battle between the State Department, White House and Pentagon. More importantly, Bush needs to redirect the US' policy in Asia, where it seems to have lost its direction to such an extent that it was hurting its allies in order to make goodwill gestures to its strategic competitor. "The main forum for the US to re-establish order in East Asia will be on the sidelines of the APEC summit, where Bush will have the opportunity of speaking individually with many Asian leaders. We hope that Bush will make the best use of this opportunity to warn its competitor while re-emphasizing its commitments to allies like Japan and Taiwan." C) "Frank Talks Essential to Security in the Strait" Liu Kuan-teh, a Taipei-based political commentator, said in the pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" (11/19): "The fact is, any speculation on whether the rotation of people dealing in Asian affairs in the new Bush Cabinet will bring about a huge change of policy toward the region would be an exaggeration. From a global and regional strategic perspective, the second Bush team will stick with the old path and pursue an even tougher campaign against international terrorism. When it comes to its influence in Asia, the new team will put North Korea on top of its priorities. "For both policies, Washington will need Beijing to cooperate. But where does Taiwan fit into such a transforming international landscape? The US stated quite clearly in its "Six Assurances" of 1982 that it would not be a mediator between Taiwan and China, and this policy has not changed. However, the role of the mediator could be indirect. Since the growing Taiwanese consciousness has met with China's closed- door policy, Washington has no choice but to play a more positive and constructive role in securing peace and stability across the Strait. "Therefore, initiating the resumption of cross-Strait dialogue constitutes the most urgent task for Rice's new Asian team. Since President Chen Shui-bian has suggested the establishment of a peace and stability framework, as well as a non-military buffer zone in the Taiwan Strait, the Bush administration should utilize every possible channel to encourage leaders from Beijing to go to the negotiation table. The meeting between Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao at the APEC summit this week is the most appropriate timing for Washington to ring the bell. . "Only through establishing frank, candid and institutionalized channels of communication between Taipei and Washington can the second Bush administration continue to uphold its commitment to the security of Taiwan." PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04