Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TAIPEI3675 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TAIPEI3675 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2004-11-18 03:48:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | KNNP TRGY ENRG TW |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003675 SIPDIS STATE FOR EAP/RSP/TC, NE/NP: ALEX BURKART UNVIE FOR HILLIARD E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/16/2014 TAGS: KNNP, TRGY, ENRG, TW SUBJECT: 2004 AIT-TECRO JSCCNC - SIDE MEETINGS Classified By: DIR Doug Paal for reasons 1.4 (b,d,and f) 1. (C) Summary. AIT and TECRO held bilateral discussions on the margins of the 20th annual Joint Standing Committee on Civil Nuclear Cooperation in Seattle (JSCCNC) (Nov 4-5). The two sides discussed: UN Security Council resolution 1540, environmental samplings from the 1980s, the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Additional Protocol and the implications for Taiwan's Atomic Energy Council (AEC) and the Institute for Nuclear Research (INER) of the reorganization of Taiwan,s government. ------------ PARTICIPANTS ------------ 2. (U) AIT and TECRO held bilateral discussion on the margins of the JSCCNC in Seattle (Nov 4-5). State/NP/NE Deputy Director Alex Burkart, AIT ESTOFF Erica Thomas and AIT Joint Standing Committee Principal Coordinator Harold Bengelsdorf represented AIT. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Minister Ouyang Min-shen, TECRO Washington Science Attache Dr. Chen Shih-kuei, AEC Director of Planning Dr. David Yao, and AEC International Affairs Chief Dr. Gone Jec-kong represented TECRO. --------------- RESOLUTION 1540 --------------- 3. (U) Burkart noted the fact that the UN Security Council passed resolution 1540, which states that all states should refrain from any kind of support of any development of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by non-state actors, that they should adopt laws that prohibit activities that could enable non-state actors to access WMD and that they should establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of WMD. He noted that the Resolution established a process for States to report on the steps they have taken to implement the provisions of the Resolution. Burkart acknowledged that Taiwan, due to its unique status, is not formally part of the Resolution's reporting process, which is intended to ensure that states have the means to implement their non-proliferation obligations. He emphasized the fact that 1540 does not impose any new obligations, but simply is intended to ensure that the legal infrastructure is in place to enforce existing treaty obligations. 4. (U) Burkart conveyed the U.S. interest in Taiwan preparing a report consistent with 1540 that could be exchanged bilaterally with the U.S. To that end, Burkart provided Taiwan with a copy of Resolution 1540, a copy of the guidelines for the report and a copy of the UK report as an example. He suggested that the UK approach might be easier to follow as it is only 14 pages compared to the U.S. report, which is 60 pages. Burkart recognized that 1540 goes beyond just nuclear issues and that Taiwan,s response to this request would require approval beyond AEC. ------------------- ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL ------------------- 5. (U) Burkart addressed the International Atomic Energy Agency,s (IAEA) Additional Protocol. He emphasized the USG commitment to seeing the successful implementation of the Protocol. To that end, he noted that the USG has promised to open up its facilities in the same way it wants other countries to open up their facilities, exempting only those related to activities of direct national security significance. He further informed Ouyang that, as soon as the implementing legislation is in place, the USG will ratify the Additional Protocol. AEC,s International Affairs Chief Dr. Gone Jec-kong noted that Taiwan signed the Protocol in 1998 and that it has already had 3 IAEA inspections. He believed that the IAEA would replace its routine inspections of Taiwan,s nuclear plants with monitoring under integrated safeguards procedures. 6. (C) Burkart commented that IAEA,s evaluation of Taiwan with respect to the history of its nuclear program had not been completed. Dr. Yao revealed that the reason for this is that INER has not been able to provide satisfactory answers regarding some environmental samplings suggesting possible nuclear activities may have occurred during the 1980s. He indicated that AEC and INER are still working on explaining the sampling results, but that it is difficult to recreate history, particularly because some of the people privy to the relevant information have since died. Yao was hopeful that the IAEA was sympathetic to all of the effort AEC has put in to date with respect to IAEA inspections. 7 (C) Burkart emphasized the importance of explaining the findings and offered assistance in sharing some of his records from the past 30 years to help reconstruct history. He also asked if AEC has been working with Chungshan Institute to answer the questions. Yao claimed that Chungshan has been very cooperative and informed AIT that AEC will meet with Chungshan again next month to try to address the outstanding questions. Yao said he would contact AIT ESTOFF if he had questions regarding information he thought Burkart might have. Burkart once again impressed upon the TECRO side the extreme importance of making sure the evaluation is completed. Burkart noted that it is critical to understand the past in order to understand the present situation. Burkart expressed satisfaction that cooperation is ongoing and urged its continuance to ensure the matter is resolved quickly. 8. (U) Minister Ouyang spoke to the current Administration's stand on nuclear issues. He assured AIT that the Chen Administration has no interest in non-peaceful uses of nuclear materials. He emphasized that Taiwan,s top nuclear priority is power generation. He noted that Taiwan is also very committed to nuclear safety and economically efficient and productive technologies. Ouyang further expressed an interest in helping Mainland China to ensure its plants are safe if a way to cooperate could be found. (Comment. The Chen Administration has not softened its anti-nuclear rhetoric, including on nuclear energy. It is not clear whether Minister Ouyang's interpretation of nuclear power generation being a priority is his personal goal or one shared more widely within the Administration. End Comment). ------ JSCCNC ------ 9. (U) Lastly, Burkart noted that the AIT-TECRO agreement covering the operation of the JSCCNC had renewed automatically by its terms at the end of the previous month. He suggested, however, that it is out of date and both sides might consider updating its terms. There is no requirement that it be revised, but he encouraged the TECRO delegation to look it over. This could be particularly important if the JSCCNC is to begin to incorporate non-nuclear energy activities as proposed by INER on several occasions. 10. (U) Ouyang welcomed the suggestion, but he noted that the Taiwan government is planning a massive reorganization that will likely move AEC from being an independent body to a subsidiary agency within an upgraded Ministry of the Environment. Both sides agreed that it would make sense to wait until after the reorganization to review the JSCCNC terms. 11. (C) Comment. AIT was surprised and encouraged by Yao's openess in revealing the problems it is encountering with respect to environmental samplings taken by the IAEA. Unfortunately, there was no indication that AEC is close to being able to provide satisfactory answers to the IAEA. Another item of potential concern is the fact that, under the proposed restructuring of Taiwan,s government, AEC would become part of the new Ministry of the Environment. It is important that AEC continue to maintain its independent regulatory oversight role after the reorganization. To ensure that this is the case, this issue may warrant follow up with TECRO contacts. In addition, as AEC's current mandate is limited to oversight of nuclear safety, it would be useful to determine which agency will have oversight of the alternative energy programs planned for INER after the government reorganization takes place. End Comment. (This cable has been cleared by State/NP/NE Deputy Director Alex Burkart). PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04