Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04PARIS8159 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04PARIS8159 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2004-11-09 17:29:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PHUM PREL FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
091729Z Nov 04
ACTION PM-00
INFO LOG-00 NP-00 AID-00 AMAD-00 CIAE-00 INL-00 DODE-00
PERC-00 DS-00 EAP-00 EUR-00 FBIE-00 VC-00 H-00
TEDE-00 INR-00 IO-00 LAB-01 L-00 VCE-00 NSAE-00
OIC-00 NIMA-00 PA-00 GIWI-00 FMPC-00 SP-00 BBG-00
IIP-00 PMB-00 DSCC-00 PRM-00 DRL-00 G-00 NFAT-00
SAS-00 /001W
------------------80FFAB 091732Z /38
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8330
INFO EU MEMBER STATES PRIORITY
USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY
USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY
USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 0953
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 008159 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/08/2014 TAGS: PHUM, PREL, FR SUBJECT: DEMARCHE ON HUMAN RIGHTS RESOLUTIONS: FRENCH RESPONSE REF: STATE 236869 Classified By: Political Minister-Counselor Josiah Rosenblatt for reaso ns 1.4 (b) and (d). 1. (U) Poloff delivered reftel demarche to MFA DAS-equivalent for Human Rights in the Directorate of United Nations and International Organizations Affairs Beatrice le Fraper du Hellen on November 9. She indicated that France would co-sponsor all of the reftel resolutions and would vote against any resolutions introduced by Belarus to draw attention away from its human rights record. 2. (U) Le Fraper du Hellen raised several thematic resolutions currently before the General Assembly. She noted that France would not be able to accommodate the US wish to withdraw language on the ICC from the resolution on political disappearances. France also has reservations, she said, about US positions on reproductive health with regard to resolutions on women's issues. Discussions continued, she noted, regarding cloning. 3. (U) The MFA continues to hope that an agreement will be reached among all WEOG countries on a rotating membership for the Human Rights Commission; however, le Fraper du Hellen continued, differences on these substantive issues could prove a stumbling block to agreement on the rotation procedure. 4. (C) Comment. The MFA official's suggestion that support for a WEOG UNCHR rotation plan may be contingent on satisfactory resolution of substantive differences on thematic resolutions is new. Until this point, France has been willing to explore a rotation plan, as long as a compromise acceptable to all WEOG members could be found (and French equities protected). The suggestion of a substantive quid pro quo from le Fraper du Hellen may have simply been an off-the-cuff remark from a relatively junior Quai official not representative of GOF policy -- or an indication of a shift. We will attempt to pin this down in future contacts with the Quai. End comment. Wolff NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04