Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA6239 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA6239 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-11-04 07:52:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | MASS PREL TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 006239 SIPDIS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: MASS, PREL, TU SUBJECT: RESTRUCTURING TURKEY'S DEFENSE INDUSTRY--A WORK IN PROGRESS 1. (SBU) Summary: Turkey's Undersecretary for Defense Industries (Savunma Sanayi Mustesarligi - SSM) Murad Bayar outlined restructuring plans for the Turkish defense industry during a September 28 Turkish-American Defense Symposium hosted by SSM and the American- Turkish Council (ATC). In the first such conference organized in Turkey, U.S. and Turkish businesses discussed the bilateral defense procurement relationship and Turkey's expectations of U.S. industry as it looks towards Western Europe and eventual EU membership. Acknowledging the role of politics in defense procurement, Bayar called for a new paradigm in the bilateral procurement relationship in which the U.S. looked to Turkey as a source for products and not just a market for US goods, suggesting that other countries, particularly EU member states, were eager to partner with Turkey. SSM and Turkish industrial representatives called for US firms to increase Turkish work share and expand technology transfers. We doubt Europeans (and Israelis) are the panacea for Turkey's defense industry woes that GOT procurement officials suggest. However, frustration with the US technology transfer approval process seems to be motivating them to seek alternatives to US suppliers. End summary. --------------------------------------------- - Four-Phase Defense Industry Restructuring Plan --------------------------------------------- - 2. (U) During a one-day symposium, SSM Representative Sedat Guldogan presented the Turkish Defense Industry Restructuring Project, launched to improve Turkish industry capacity, and increase sales and technological capability. Guldogan underlined the importance of consolidating Turkish defense companies. The strategy behind the restructuring project was to increase local industry capacity (especially to meet the needs of the armed forces), to adopt and produce new technology, to enter international programs with mutual dependence and meaningful work share (not just as a supplier or component producer), and to utilize existing capacities and make effective investments, in order to compete internationally and increase exports. 3. (U) SSM plans to implement this project in 4 phases: (1) consolidate majority state-owned companies - primarily ASELSAN (produces electronic technologies), HAVELSAN (produces avionics, fight simulators, command and control information management systems), TUSAS (Turkish Aircraft Industries - joint venture company between Turkish government and General Electric Co.), TAI (Turkish Aerospace Industries -produces aerospace components) and ROKETSAN (produces missile/rocket components); (2) consolidate other state-owned facilities like MKEK (Machinery & Chemistry Industry Corporation), THY maintenance (Turkish Airlines), HABOM (Aero-Maintenance Repair & Overhaul Center); (3) consolidate armed forces maintenance and repair facilities and capabilities; and (4) privatize the entire defense industry. 4. (U) The first phase calls for the establishment of a central holding company for TUSAS, TAI, ASELSON, HAVELSAN and ROKETSAN (companies where SSM is the principal share holder) responsible for management, business development, strategic planning, finance, human resources, R&D, procurement and marketing. The holding company would focus on technology-based cooperation, design and development projects, projects for joint ventures, and improved and sustained developments with foreign companies. No time line for completion of this phase was provided. (Comment: A Nov. 3 Turkish press report stated that only four companies would be included in the consolidation plan, excluding TUSAS. SSM confirmed for us Nov. 3 that TUSAS is still slated to be included. End Comment.) --------------------------------------------- ------- Turkish Industry Transformation: From Co-Producer to Co- Developer --------------------------------------------- ------- 5. (U) Undersecretary Bayar, in a panel discussion on the `Turkish-US Defense Industry Relations', commented that the Turkish-US defense cooperation paradigm needed to shift, with the U.S. viewing Turkey not only as a market for its products but also as a source of quality technology and finished components. His goal is to transition TU-US cooperation from co-production to co- development. In response to a question on whether Turkey's EU aspirations would impact its procurement policy, Bayar acknowledged that procurement deals were political and that Turkey would look more closely at Europe, not only because of Turkey's desire to join the EU but also because European firms appear more eager to work with Turkish firms and are more open to partnerships that include investment and technological transfer. Bayar further indicated that Turkish and US companies should seek opportunities to develop joint products given that the new restructuring project foresaw procuring many materials through partnerships like the current model in Germany. 6. (U) While Turkish participants agreed that Turkey may not become a major exporter of equipment or systems to the US, they expected to be able to supply sub- systems and components for US companies. Turkish panelists stressed that U.S. technology transfer restrictions were a serious obstacle, and that US companies should consider using Turkey as bridge to find new markets in Europe. Several US panelists noted that Turkey's low research and development (R&D) budget and lack of investment in high-tech equipment limits its competitiveness in world markets. While acknowledging this comment, Bayar did not provide any information to suggest that Turkey planned to increase R&D or technology investments as part of the industry- restructuring plan. ----------------------------- Comment: Is Europe the Answer ----------------------------- 7. (SBU) Comment: SSM presented the new restructuring project as a well-developed concept that had been in the works for six months. However, this was the first time it was explained publicly and many details appear to be left hanging, including the mechanism for eventual private sector participation. We do not believe SSM's confidence in European and Israeli eagerness to transfer technology rings true but the lengthy US transfer approval process is a regular source of complaint by Turkish government and industry officials alike. SSM's goal is to turn the Turkish defense industry into a net exporter of military goods and the government is looking for foreign partners that will help make this a reality. End Comment. Edelman
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04