Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TAIPEI3488 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TAIPEI3488 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2004-11-04 07:43:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO TW Cross Strait Politics Foreign Policy |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 TAIPEI 003488 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ROBERT PALLADINO DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, TW, Cross Strait Politics, Foreign Policy SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S. ELECTIONS AND U.S. POLICY, SECRETARY POWELL'S REMARKS IN BEIJING 1. U.S. Elections and U.S. Policy A) "Bush Gets Re-elected with a Narrow Margin, But the Price He Pays Is the United States' Unity and Democratic Image" The conservative, pro-unification "United Daily News" commented in an editorial (11/4): "Over the past four years, [U.S. President George W.] Bush has lost the United States' glory and the world's respect for [his country]. Domestically, it is even more difficult to calculate what Bush has lost for his country. The campaign strategy that Bush adopted this time was to renounce the middle road that the United States used to pursue. As a result, he has incited voters that believe in different values to confront each other and left the society no room for tolerance. That is why some people described this U.S. election as a `domestic war.' The Bush administration's use of a drastic manipulative approach in an attempt to win the majority of votes also means that he has given up the hope to win the hearts of the other half of American voters. Such an unorthodox approach shows that Bush lacks the open-minded bearing and vision that a state leader requires. Even though he succeeded by manipulating the anti-terrorism issue and employing a negative campaign strategy against his opponent, he could hardly convince his rival and the rival's supporters. . "In fact, Bush's re-election may not necessarily benefit Taiwan's political reality. Let's not forget the strong-worded statements made by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell during his trip to East Asia just a few days before the general elections. Powell's remarks, including his call for cross-Strait dialogue and [the United States'] lack of support for Taiwan independence, should be the new bottom line of the Bush administration. It is really difficult to imagine that Bush, if re-elected, will continue to insist on facing the world with his `unilateralism.' If Bush has even the slightest intention to heal the hurt, his cross- Strait policy will not possibly continue to stay severe. If so, then the `Powell framework' will then likely become a blueprint for Bush to deal with the cross-Strait situation in the future. ." B) "A Divided United States Is Bush's Biggest Challenge after He Is Re-elected" The centrist, pro-status quo "China Times" observed in an editorial (11/4): ". Over the past three years, the political division and the confrontations in public views created by Bush in the United States have been more serious than those during the Vietnam War. This presidential campaign has also further ignited the different sentiments of `support for Bush' and `opposition to Bush.' . "We want to say objectively that even though Bush has won a majority of the votes, it is because [Senator John] Kerry had the cardinal principles in mind and took the overall situation and the unity of the United States into account so that the election could end smoothly. As a re-elected president, Bush must observe and understand the expectations of [U.S.] society and the international community, serving as a `unifier,' and seeking to win the support of the other half of American voters who did not vote for him during this election. This is where his heavenly mandate and challenge lies." C) "Bush's Re-election and Prospects for U.S.-Taiwan Relations" Washington correspondent James Wang said in the "Washington Reviews" column of the pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" (11/4): ". We anticipate that the Bush administration will continue putting emphasis on Taiwan's security issues. Taiwan's strategic status weighs heavily in the Bush administration's strategic perception, and the United States will not overlook China's threats against Taiwan. "We also anticipate that the Bush administration will maintain an impartial attitude when urging Taiwan and China to engage in a dialogue to alleviate cross-Strait tensions, but it will not force Taiwan to compromise and accept China's position. . "The general position and wishes of the Taiwan people are that we insist that Taiwan is an independent sovereign state and we hope that the United States could accommodate Taiwan's democratic evolvement and recognize Taiwan as a sovereign nation. The United States, as a model for democracy, should clearly understand [the Taiwan people's position]. D) "Bush's Re-election Is the General Trend" Washington correspondent Norman Fu said in the "Washington Outlook" column of the centrist, pro-status quo "China Times" (11/4): "In general, Bush's re-election might not necessarily be favorable for the entire world situation. Bin Laden's terrorism and chaos in Iraq will continue and will grow more severe. Chances are smaller that the United States and EU nations will reconcile. The conservative powers inside the United States will become consolidated all the more and confrontations between the Republicans and Democrats will grow stronger. Bush's `unilateralist' superpower diplomacy will likely move toward the direction in that `those who submit will thrive and those who resist shall meet ruin.' For Taiwan, which needs the United States' help for almost everything, how can it dare to offend the United States by doing whatever it wants?" E) "US, Taiwan Are Democratic Partners" The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" editorialized (11/4): ". As an ally of the US., Taiwan is surely interested in the re-election of Bush. We are not concerned about the possibility of the Bush administration shifting its Taiwan policy. After all, the US is already a mature democracy. Taiwan-US relations have steadily developed on the basis on a long-term friendship. Although there were some ups and downs in the past, Taiwan-US relations are unlikely to alter unless a drastic change takes place across the Taiwan Strait. "We are concerned about the election because Taiwan-US relations are complex. We hope that post-election legal squabbling will not damage the image of US democracy. An incident-free outcome will help Taiwan and the US continue to boost their bilateral exchanges. Taipei needs to get on with talking to Washington about the proposed arms procurement plan, as well as our efforts to enter the World Health Organization and other international bodies. ." F) "U.S. Needs Reform, Lien Chan Must Go" The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News" said in an editorial (11/4): ". Four more years of George W. Bush are likely to be four more years of a festering morass in Iraq, explosive tensions in the Middle East and a `head in the sand' (or rather, prayer book) attitude to efforts by the world community to resolve critical global ills through multilateral efforts from the Kyoto Protocol on global warming to the International Criminal Court. "Global cooperation may well be affected by the clash between a highly conservative Republican regime in the U.S. with the surfacing trend for `center-left' governments in Europe, Latin American [sic] and much of Asia. "The continuation of a Republican administration may also not be as positive for Taiwan as some pundits seem to expect. "The continuity of leadership in the U.S. and Taiwan along with the consolidation of the power of People's Republic of China State Chairman Hu Jintao may boost prospects for dialogue as Washington is likely to take a proactive role in brokering such talks at the same time as supplying Taiwan with defensive weaponry. "But the flip side will include pressure on Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party government and the Taiwanese people to refrain from any action that might `provoke' Beijing, including affirming our sovereignty or revamping our Constitution. "Demands for more assistance in campaigns against `terrorism' and the Iraqi quagmire are also likely to be voiced by Washington in step with the declining degree of tolerance by other members of the world community for the Bushian `crusades.' "Gaps in priorities are likely to emerge between the U.S. `faith-based' government and the DPP government, which is trying to traverse a `Taiwan road' of democracy, human rights, and sustainability. ." G) "The U.S. Won't Tolerate Taiwan Independence" The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" noted in an editorial (11/4): ". It is true that the Republicans are traditionally more supportive of Taiwan. But this hardly justifies the conclusion that, when the U.S. president is a member of the Grand Old Party, Taiwan will be safer from a mainland Chinese attack. "Recently U.S. Secret [sic] of State Colin Powell, during a visit to Asia, said Taiwan does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, and stated that `reunification' with mainland China must be achieved by peaceful means. The remarks have dealt the Taiwan independence movement a crushing blow. Those who pursue Taiwan independence must not have the misconception that Taiwan can always count on America to come to its aid in the face of an attack from mainland China. Should the Taipei government go too far in its attempt to make the island an independent state, the U.S. will certainly intervene, whoever its president is." 2. Secretary Powell's Remarks in Beijing Hsu Yung-ming, assistant research fellow at the Academia Sinica, said in the pro-independence, English- language "Taipei Times" (11/4): ". Powell's words have completely changed the myth about Taiwan's democratic development. We finally understand that enjoying democracy does not equal enjoying sovereignty as a nation, and supporting Taiwan to boost democracy is not supporting the Taiwanese people to become their own masters. Thus, the way Washington treats Taipei is no better than the way Beijing treats Hong Kong. . "The Taiwanese people think that they are becoming their own masters when striving for democracy. But from a US perspective, it is just an improvement of human welfare. The Taiwanese people think that they are deepening democracy and resolving a political deadlock through the push for referendums. But from a US perspective, it is a push for Taiwan independence. Obviously, under this US patriarchy, Washington's views Taipei as a democratic offspring that needs its special care. But the former also locks the latter in a birdcage, so that it will not fly away and cause trouble. "Viewed from this perspective, perhaps it is better for Taiwan and China to resume their talks. At least, Taiwan will have a chance to speak for itself without US pressure. It must take the initiative, rather than depending on the US forever. The Democratic Progressive Party government should make the public aware of the gap between Taiwan's democracy and sovereignty, and both the blue and green camps should clarify their stances on the issue. Apart from the Taiwanese people's pro-unification and pro-independence sentiments, the key lies in the fact that there is no longer a gray area. Taiwan cannot now enjoy both democracy and sovereignty - just democracy without sovereignty. ." PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04