Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04THEHAGUE2776 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04THEHAGUE2776 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2004-10-29 08:54:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PHUM RW CG BY NL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 002776 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR AND AF E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/29/2014 TAGS: PREL, PHUM, RW, CG, BY, NL, EUN SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/EU/AFRICA: DUTCH SEEKING SUPPORT FOR GREAT LAKES CONFERENCE REF: NEWTON-BUCKNEBERG EMAIL 10/20/04 Classified By: POL Counselor Andrew Schofer for reasons 1.4 (b/d) 1. (C) Summary: The Dutch are fully invested in the November 19-20 Great Lakes Conference (GLC), having contributed 500,000 euros (and reportedly considering doubling that amount). The Dutch will table by the end of December a draft EU strategy for the Great Lakes region, based on the long-term development strategy associated with the GLC, and will press for its adoption within the next 8 months. The EU will discuss the status of preparations for the GLC and expected EU participation at next week's GAERC meeting. The Dutch are also looking to garner additional international support and seek closer coordination with the U.S. in the region in general. End Summary. Dutch Drafting EU Strategy for Great Lakes ------------------------------------------ 2. (C) At MFA's request, Poloff met on October 26 with Senior Policy Advisor for the Great Lakes Andre Dellevoet to discuss the latest preparations for the November 19-20 Great Lakes Conference. Dellevoet had just returned from the Second GLC PrepCom and told poloff he believed the African delegations, along with the African Union and United Nations, are fully engaged and on board with the Great Lakes Conference. He also revealed that the Dutch Presidency is currently drafting an EU strategy for the region, to include a long- term development perspective along the lines of the Great Lakes Conference, which will be tabled by the end of the Dutch Presidency in December. Dellovoet said he expected this strategy to be adopted before the end of the Luxembourg Presidency next June. 3. (C) Dellevoet shared with poloff the draft declarations to be agreed at the November GLC Summit (faxed to AF/C October 27), and said the document had convinced him that "Dar Es Salaam will not be a failure." Dellevoet explained that the Dutch foresee the draft declarations will provide the basis for action plans to be created prior to a second GLC Summit in June which, he hoped, would yield binding international protocols. He acknowledged that to a certain extent it "remains to be seen" whether subsequent action plans and, eventually, implementation can all follow feasibly from the Conference. He reiterated, however, that if the Conference can yield such concrete steps, the Dutch believe they can convince the EU to come on board fully with a GLC-based long-term strategy. 4. (C) Separately, MFA Director of Political Affairs Jaap Werner told POLCOUNS October 26 that the Belgians have placed the Great Lakes on the agenda of the November 2 EU General Affairs and External Relations Committee (GAERC) under "all other business." Dellevoet told Poloff October 28 he expects "no breathtaking new decisions" but that the GAERC will be updated on the status of Conference preparations and discuss the expected level of EU representation at the GLC. Dutch Believe Africans Seized With Wider View --------------------------------------------- - 5. (C) Drawing from ref points, poloff outlined to Dellevoet U.S. concerns about the unwieldy scope and expanding costs associated with the Conference. While Dellevoet agreed that "certain issues and concerns remain" with regard to the Conference, he believed they were not insurmountable. He emphasized that the AU and Africans were taking "greater ownership" of the Conference, which appears to hold the "conviction of the African delegations." Dellevoet asked that the international community appreciate the "dynamism" of factors and personalities at play; as one example, he stated that the Zambian leader holds enormous respect among the African community and can easily bring the group to task, but that a more limited forum would not provide the same dynamic. 6. (C) Dellevoet emphasized that "in the African view" the issues at stake in the region are much broader than strictly politics and security, and expressed concern that a narrow approach such as that of the tripartite talks depends solely on specific leaders who hold limited authority and legitimacy. Resulting agreements, he said, might prove fragile over the longer term. The more comprehensive approach embodied by the Great Lakes Conference had already won the buy-in of the African community -- which Dellevoet attributed to the fact that the GLC is "broad enough" to address the "complicated interlinkages" underlying the conflict such as natural resources, population and development. He argued that these issues are also "crucial issues as Africans perceive them" and warned that such linkages could prove spoilers to political settlements reached separately. Emphasizing the importance of finding a resolution process that is meaningful to Africans, he commented that "Nobody has to tell the Africans how serious this is." Dutch Seeking Further International Support ------------------------------------------- 7. (C) Dellevoet argued that without concerted international community support to move the situation along, the gains recently made would be lost. Dellevoet stated that the "Group of Friends" is not sufficiently coherent to support the AU/UN effort. He estimated that the EU was not quite ready to take a more active role, although he thought the European Commission itself would like to do so. Dellevoet said the Dutch would be willing to come to Washington to discuss a common approach, acknowledging that they would also be requesting financial support for the Great Lakes Conference. When poloff reminded him that the U.S. had already made clear (ref) that it would not provide voluntary funding, Dellevoet pressed on undeterred, describing the mutual benefits short of additional funding that could be gained in streamlining activities and identifying a joint political and/or development approach in the region. 8. (C) Comment: The Dutch are quite literally invested in the success of the Great Lakes Conference, having contributed 500,000 euros already and considering another 500,000 euro contribution to be decided by mid-November. Dellevoet rightly noted that Dutch Development Minister Van Ardenne has staked her political reputation on the success of Dutch initiatives in the Sudan and the Great Lakes region, for which she has been the primary champion. We should expect the Dutch to continue pressing in support of what they consider the best chance for long-term development success in the region. SOBEL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04