Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04LJUBLJANA981 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04LJUBLJANA981 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ljubljana |
| Created: | 2004-10-26 11:26:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL MARR MCAP MOPS SI NATO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 000981 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/NCE AND EUR/RPM E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/25/2014 TAGS: PREL, MARR, MCAP, MOPS, SI, NATO SUBJECT: SLOVENIAN MOD GIVES DAS CONLEY DEFENSE REFORM SNAPSHOT ON THE EVE OF A NEW GOVERNMENT Classified By: Chief of Mission Thomas B. Robertson for reasons 1.5(b) and (d). 1. (C) SUMMARY: DAS Heather Conley engaged high level MoD officials in a productive dialogue about the current status and future of Slovenian defense reforms during meetings on 21 October. Both State Secretary Milan Jazbec and State Undersecretary Uros Krek described the Slovenian commitment to spend two percent of GDP on defense by 2008 as firm. They also provided a detailed outline of plans to use those funds to pursue NATO Force Goals. Krek highlighted the challenge of training Slovenia's future civilian and military leaders, but he characterized MoD and SAF morale positively. Krek also outlined Slovenia's out-of-area troop commitments, highlighting a Force Goal-focused budgeting process and a policy not to place national caveats on troops. He underscored Slovenia's commitment to NATO-led missions by emphasizing that Slovenia ranks fourth among the Allies in percentage of active troops deployed abroad. Krek reiterated the Slovenian policy of participating in a NATO Iraq training mission only in a third country. Jazbec and Krek provided a comprehensive snapshot of bilateral defense issues that describe a baseline for the new Slovenian Government to build upon when it is formed. END SUMMARY 2. (C) On 21 October, DAS Heather Conley met with MoD State Secretary Milan Jazbec and State Undersecretary Uros Krek, SIPDIS who serves as Director of the Office for Defense Policy. Jazbec and Krek were accompanied by Mr. Jursa, Head of the Department of Analysis; Tadej Burger, Head of the NATO Department; and Aljosa Selan, U.S. Desk Officer. COM, DATT, and Pol-Miloff joined Conley, who commended Slovenia for its contributions to ISAF; acknowledged Slovenia's strong interest in playing a peacekeeping role in its "neighborhood"; and urged the Slovenes to focus on complementarity - not competition - as they pursue defense reforms with an eye to contributing to both NATO and EU-led operations. Conley then launched what the DATT called one of the best dialogues he has seen with MoD officials by asking pointed questions about Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF) capabilities, the future of Slovenian defense spending, and the most significant challenges facing the MoD moving forward. JAZBEC'S OVERVIEW: TWO PERCENT GOAL FIRM UNDER NEW GOV'T --------------------------------------------- ----------- 3. (C) After introductory remarks highlighting Slovenia's future as a security player in the Western Balkans and a positive assessment of SAF professionalization over the past two years, Jazbec agreed with Conley about the importance of complementarity. Jazbec also made the point that NATO membership for Slovenia actually increases the importance of bilateral relations with the U.S. He said Slovenia will now have an opportunity to live up to expectations that it will become a regional leader. With respect to Slovenia's upcoming Chairmanship of the OSCE in 2005, Jazbec said the MoD is looking for ways to contribute, particularly in Southeastern Europe but also possibly in the Caucasus. 4. (C) In response to Conley's question about future defense spending, in light of the Slovenian commitment to NATO to devote two percent of GDP to defense by 2008, Jazbec said Slovenia's "strong commitment" is "firm." He noted that the commitment would likely be bolstered in the coming weeks when the strongly pro-NATO center-right parties form a new Government on the heels of the 03 October national elections. In response to a question about niche capabilities for use in the NATO Response Force (NRF) and elsewhere, Jazbec noted Slovenia's plans to contribute an NBC Battalion for NATO's High Readiness Forces by the end of the decade, with an NBC platoon to be in place by January 2005 for the NRF. He mentioned the further development of the Mountain School in Pokljuka, highlighted Slovenia's PfP language center, and identified "communications" as an area of development. 5. (C) When asked about the most significant challenges facing the MoD, Jazbec responded that "individuals need to cope on an institutional basis with the challenges NATO membership brings to Slovenia." (NOTE: Jazbec's comment probably refers to an on-going dynamic within MoD concerning the reorganization of the bureaucracy to deal with NATO integration, as well as the continuing effort to change individuals' mindsets from a focus on national defense to a focus on collective security. While the change in mindset has been mostly successful, MoD still suffers from a shortage of people to deal with the increased workload brought on by NATO and EU memberhsip. END NOTE) Jazbec also highlighted the public diplomacy challenge of translating the day-to-day support of NATO operations by the GoS into policies supported by public opinion. He said the GoS learned to work as an institution to accomplish a similar goal during the March 2003 NATO referendum, but he stressed the need to continue such work now that Slovenia is a member of the Alliance. Optimistically, Jazbec noted that - for the first time in its history - Slovenia will soon have a Prime Minister with a background in Defense Studies. "Jansa has a very sensitive ear for these issues... I know this well," he said, inferring that he is close to Jansa himself. (NOTE: Jazbec said that he would soon return to the MFA; however, he did not mention in what capacity. END NOTE) CONLEY/KREK DIALOGUE: PLANS IN PLACE FOR CONTINUED REFORMS --------------------------------------------- ------------- 6. (C) Thanking Conley for more than a decade of USG support, Krek drew attention to what he deemed the most important component of that support: the training and education of Slovenia's civilian and military personnel. Emphasizing the success of the Slovenian defense establishment in changing the prevailing mindset from one of territorial defense to a collective defense model, Krek gave the following rundown of facts and figures before responding to a series of probing questions by Conley: -- reduction in the SAF reserves from 71,000 in 1999 to a projected 5,500 in 2010; -- obligations of the last conscripted reservists will end in 2010; and -- numbers for active duty soldiers as a result of professionalization: 4,500 in 1999; approximately 7,000 today; and a projected 8,500 in 2010. He mentioned that Slovenia's new "voluntary conscription service program" is more successful than the MoD anticipated, providing three months of paid survival and basic skills training to young Slovenes considering a career in the SAF or the reserves. Noting that the MoD finalized its Strategic Defense Review last February, he said Parliament has approved a Defense Plan through 2015, to be amended every four years. MoD has approved a six-year Defense Program, to be amended every two years. The six-year Program will be submitted for approval when a new Government is formed. GOOD MORALE: A "GREEN LIGHT" FOR FURTHER REFORMS --------------------------------------------- --- 7. (C) Conley asked how the MoD and SAF are handling all of the recent changes, and Krek replied that a critical mass in the MoD supports the defense reforms, saying "there is a big green light" to move forward. He then shifted focus to the soldiers on the ground in international operations. Having just visited SAF troops in Bosnia, Krek said the "motivation is there" for the units to accomplish their missions. (NOTE: Krek conspicuously failed to mention the morale of the General Staff and the SAF military leadership, perhaps reflecting the frustrations of DefMin Anton Grizold with a CHOD, Major General Ladislav Lipic, whom he has sometimes characterized to DATT as slow-moving. DATT has observed other indications that the MoD civilian staff and the General Staff are not always "in synch" with respect to the pace of reforms. END NOTE) OUT-OF-AREA OPERATIONS: NO CAPS AND NO CAVEATS --------------------------------------------- - 8. (C) Conley asked about troops abroad, generally, with specific follow-up questions about the budgeting process for out-of-area operations, caps on troop contributions, and national caveats. Krek said that a budget consistent with NATO Force Goals, encompassing out-of-area operations, has been proposed as part of the six-year Defense Program. If future events necessitate sending a unit out-of-area earlier than expected, he said the interim two-year review would have to be adjusted to reflect that reality. Krek said the GoS had discussed setting a limit on the number of troops they would send abroad under a "Framework Plan." Current limitations are budgetary, though, and he said there are no legislated caps on the number of deployable troops. The GoS can decide to commit troops for international missions, but it cannot commit reservists. 9. (C) Krek said he is personally pleased with "a purposeful policy not to place national caveats" on troop commitments. There are no caveats on SFOR troops. Certain restrictions have been placed on SAF troops in KFOR, though, in response to an earlier situation in which uniformed soldiers in a Slovenian Multilateral Service Unit (MSU) were used for riot control procedures that had been proscribed for other countries' troops. (Conley noted that the KFOR dynamic was a perfect example of why national caveats are counter-productive.) 10. (C) Slovenia currently has 237 troops stationed abroad, according to Krek. That figure will rise to approximately 300 by May 2005. Krek noted the reconnaissance unit and two firefighters currently deployed with ISAF. He said a veterinary attachment would be sent to Afghanistan soon and that the GoS is discussing the possibility of sending two PRT liaison officers. Slvenia plans to maintain its participation in ISAF with increases through the end of 2007, he said, noting that the firefighters are committed through the end of 2006. The SAF platoon of military police in Kosovo is committed to KFOR through 2006. Slovenia has contributed a company, two MP platoons and a medical unit to SFOR. Their contributions in Bosnia will increase with the EU takeover of SFOR later this year. Starting in early 2007, Krek said the Slovenes will have a battalion prepared for deployment within the Balkans. HOST NATION SUPPORT: DEVELOPING CERKLJE AIRFIELD --------------------------------------------- --- 11. (C) Conley asked if Slovenia already has its Host Nation Support requirements in place, particularly the requirement for a NATO-designated airfield. Krek responded that "most of the basics are in place." He also stated that Slovenia will participate in NATO's "core airfield study" with the focus on the military airfield at Cerklje. Ceklje requires improvements before it can be designated a NATO-capable airfield. Brnik International Airport will, therefore, remain Slovenia's NATO-designated airfield until 2007. AIR POLICING: SATISFIED WITH ITALIAN COVERAGE --------------------------------------------- 12. (C) Krek told Conley that Slovenia is "satisfied with what is currently in place" with regard to Italian air-policing. He said the Italians have committed to police Slovenian airspace for three more rotations and that they have expressed a willingness to continue even further into the future. Slovenia has no plans to procure aircraft for its own air policing missions, said Krek, adding that NATO had advised them against this because it would endanger Slovenia's ability to fulfill its Force Goals. Conley said, emphatically, "Well done! I second that." PUBLIC DIPLOMACY: NO BUYERS REMORSE ----------------------------------- 13. (C) Conley asked Krek to elaborate on the public diplomacy aspects of being a NATO member and whether Slovenes had experienced any residual "buyers remorse." Krek framed his answer in a parliamentary context, noting that the Defense Plans he mentioned earlier had the political support of a majority of parties from the outgoing Parliament (which had its last session on 22 October). Generally, he said he expects no changes with the new Parliament, emphasizing that budget figures certainly will not change. Nonetheless, he said that reaching two percent of GDP for defense spending by 2008 will require "firm discipline" by politicians, parliamentarians, and the public. He noted that two percent of GDP today translates into approximately 400 million euros. By 2010, that figure should equal about 700 million euros, he said. TWO PERCENT: A FIRM GOAL ------------------------ 14. (C) When pushed by Conley on the strength of Slovenia's commitment to reach the two percent goal by 2008, Krek said he is "fully confident" it will be met. Within that figure, though, he stressed the importance of allocating funds sensibly. For example, he mentioned the goal of reaching a 50/30/20 formula for defense expenditures, with 50 percent of the budget going for personnel costs, 30 percent for operations and maintenance, and 20 percent for modernization. When Conley mentioned that 50 percent for personnel seemed high, Krek pointed out that current personnel costs consume 64 percent of the Slovenian defense budget. Over the next six years, Krek said Slovenia would spend around 600 million euros on modernization, with a focus on achieving NATO Force Goals, including the development of infantry and NBC battalions; intelligence gathering capabilities; command and control; and strategic lift capabilities (both air and sea). STRATEGIC LIFT THROUGH NATO CONTRACT POOLS ------------------------------------------ 15. (C) Questioned later by DATT about air and sea lift capabilities, Krek said that Slovenia already has in place two strategic lift agreements within NATO. These agreements are to participate in the NATO contract pools for strategic air- and sealift. In the event Slovenia were to require strategic lift, the Slovenes would identify their air or sea requirements to NATO, where available resources would be identified and contracted. TRAINING: THE MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGE -------------------------------------- 16. (C) Krek told Conley that the most important challenge facing the MoD and the SAF is training personnel, particularly increasing the number of staff officers who can operate in an international context and educating both civilian officials and politicians about defense matters. Krek, an ICAF alum himself, praised the IMET program in this regard. He did mention, though, that it is sometimes a difficult balancing act for the MoD to release its best and brightest for long-term training when they are needed desperately in the Ministry. A SLOVENIAN ROLE IN IRAQ: TRAINING OK IN A THIRD COUNTRY --------------------------------------------- ----------- 17. (C) Krek steered the conversation toward Iraq, noting that Conley had not mentioned the issue earlier. He said Slovenia intends to support a NATO training mission by providing instructors and/or equipment. Echoing what other GoS officials have said before, he stressed that Slovenian instructors would train Iraqis only in a third country, i.e. neither in Iraq nor in Slovenia. He said the GoS supports deputing SAF officers to NATO Headquarters. Krek said that Slovenia is now "completely stretched" with its current overseas troop commitments. That said, he called attention to the fact that Slovenia ranks fourth among NATO Allies in the percentage (approximately three percent) of its troops committed to out-of-area NATO missions. Canada, Norway, and Germany outrank Slovenia, he said. 18. (C) Conley said she understands the sensitivities in Slovenia about Iraq and that the USG would like its allies to participate. She said the Iraqis have great appreciation for Slovenian contributions to the reconstruction of Iraq in the fields of demining, police training, and psychological assistance to children. KREK'S QUESTIONS: U.S. BALKANS POLICY AND ISAF/OEF MERGER --------------------------------------------- ------------ 19. (C) Krek ventured two questions toward the end of the conversation: he asked for Conley's views on the future activities of the USG in the Balkans and on the merger of ISAF and OEF. Conley said the U.S. will remain "very engaged politically" in the transition process but that it is "appropriate to allow the EU to assume greater responsibilities in the Balkans." She expressed optimism that the transition will be successful despite the withdrawal of NATO in Bosnia. On the ISAF/OEF merger, Conley said the Military Committee at NATO would have to look at this and predicted it would involve a long-term process. She stressed, though, that efforts are underway to make PRTs in Afghanistan more robust and to tackle the counter-narcotics issue. COMMENT ------- 20. (C) Conley's knowledge of the issues and incisive questioning ensured that the meetings at MoD - indeed, the first meetings in the MoD building for COM - provided one of the most insightful and comprehensive assessments we have received to date of where Slovenia stands on defense reforms and where it intends to go in the future. At the same time, she delivered the well-received message that the U.S. wishes to continue strengthening and expanding its bilateral relationship with Slovenia. The dialogue with Jazbec was fruitful in providing a general overview of recent reforms. His comments on the new center-right Government were also of interest, particularly the suggestion that he has close ties to Janez Jansa, whom we assume will be the next Prime Minister. We will watch with interest to see where Jazbec lands upon his return to the MFA. Krek lived up to his reputation as the Embassy's most engaged contact in the MoD. His insight and influence as an analyst of defense policy have been a direct result of the trust and confidence placed in him by DefMin Grizold and the IMET training he received at the National Defense University. Despite imminent changes in the political leadership of the MoD, we expect Krek to provide the continuity and working-level leadership that will be needed at MoD in the coming months. END COMMENT ROBERTSON NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04