Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BRUSSELS4294 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BRUSSELS4294 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brussels |
| Created: | 2004-10-06 08:48:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL CY MT TU EUN NATO USEU BRUSSELS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 004294 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/ FO PDAS BRADTKE, EUR/RPM, EUR/ERA E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2014 TAGS: PREL, CY, MT, TU, EUN, NATO, USEU BRUSSELS SUBJECT: CYPRIOTS FLOAT A BALLOON ON NATO SECURITY AGREEMENT AND PFP REF: BRUSSELS 4082 Classified By: USEU Political-Military Officer Jeremy Brenner for reaso ns 1.5 (b) and (d) 1. (C) Summary: The Cypriot military representative to the EU suggests that Nicosia is giving serious consideration to negotiating a security agreement with NATO as part of an effort to resolve the blockage in EU-NATO strategic cooperation. Nicosia is also eager to participate in the EU Battlegroup program. End summary. NATO Security Agreement ----------------------- 2. (C) Cypriot Military Representative to the European Union, Lt. Colonel Pantelis Christophorou (strictly protect) told USEU polmiloffs that Nicosia was giving very serious consideration to negotiating a security agreement with NATO as part of a strategy to resolve the problem of participation by Cyprus and Malta in discussions of EU-NATO strategic cooperation. Christophorou said that he had discussed the issue with the Cypriot Permanent Representative to the EU, and that the mission was prepared to send the proposal directly to President Papadopoulos, on the condition that they were given a "green light" signaling Turkey's acceptance of the plan. PfP Membership -------------- 3. (C) Christophorou lamented his exclusion from meetings where NATO classified information (NCI) is discussed, and said that Nicosia wanted to be a full participant in EU defense matters. Adherence to a security agreement with NATO would remove one of the obstacles cited by Turkey preventing Cyprus and Malta from participating in discussions involving NCI. Access to NCI would also require subscription to the PfP framework document, under the provisions of the EU-NATO Security Agreement. Christophorou said that PfP membership or even accession to NATO are under consideration in Nicosia, although he acknowledged that there would be some domestic political opposition in Parliament. He argued that political circumstances in Nicosia have evolved to the point where these subjects can be raised for serious consideration. He told us that the major impediment was concern over a negative response from Turkey. Rejecting the Plan, Not Reunification ------------------------------------- 4. (C) Christophorou contended that the "no" vote by Greek Cypriots on the Annan plan for reunification was a vote against the plan, not against reunification. He said that reunification is working in practice, with residents of Northern Cyprus free to travel in the south. He cited security concerns as the major reason for the rejection of the Annan plan, but said that Cyprus as a whole should not be made to suffer because Turkey seeks to punish the Greek Cypriots for rejecting the reunification plan. Aiming for December ------------------- 5. (C) He suggested that the security agreement could be pushed ahead quickly, perhaps even by December in order to be part of a package that would coincide with a positive message to Turkey on EU accession. Battlegroup Participation ------------------------- 6. (C) Christophorou was enthusiastic about the possibility of Cypriot participation in an EU battlegroup. He said that Cyprus had no preconceived ideas about potential partners in such a unit, saying that Nicosia was open to any possibility. Christophorou suggested that Cyprus had a number of facilities and other assets to offer to an EU battlegroup, although they could not offer more than a platoon or two of troops. He said that he was unaware of any national caveats that would prevent Cypriots troops from being deployed outside their national territory or restrict the kinds of duties they could perform. He mused that it would be an odd circumstance for Cypriot forces to be deployed on peacekeeping missions outside the country while the Island itself was still divided. 7. (C) Comment: Christophorou would not be likely to trot out the prospect of a security agreement without instructions from Nicosia. As a practical matter, Cyprus already adheres to the EU security arrangement, which was itself designed to meet NATO standards. Acquiescence by Ankara at the NAC would remove one obstacle to broader EU-NATO cooperation at a time when the pace of military/ESDP activity is increasing within the EU. We defer to Embassy Nicosia to evaluate Lt. Col. Christophorou's assertion that the political climate has evolved sufficiently to allow for discussion of PfP membership. What is clear, is that this blockage is shutting off significant avenues of new cooperation between NATO and the EU, and Ankara is not winning any friends within the EU by its stance. Schnabel
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04