Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ACCRA1980 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ACCRA1980 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Accra |
| Created: | 2004-10-05 12:37:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ECPS GH |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ACCRA 001980 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/01/2009 TAGS: ECPS, GH SUBJECT: WESTEL FILES USD 60 MILLION EXPROPRIATION CLAIM AGAINT THE GOVERNMENT OF GHANA REF: ACCRA 01237 Classified By: EconChief Chris Landberg for Reason 1.5 (d) 1. (C) SUMMARAY: Western Wireless International (WWI) told post they filed on September 21 for international arbitration to settle subsidiary Westel's seven-year-old dispute with the GoG. According to Westel's Managing Director Bill Taylor, WWI will not fund any further expansion in Ghana and is ready to pull out of the country completely if the situation does not improve. Taylor also expressed fears that the GoG may retaliate by trying to undermine Westel's existing operation. The GoG claims they will comply with their contractual obligation to arbitration. Post will monitor the process. End Summary. 2. (C) WWI is seeking USD 60 million in lost revenue and punitive damages, claiming that the GoG's failure to provide frequencies for Westel's wireless operations amount to de facto expropriation of WWI's investment. Two years ago Westel agreed to pay an "uncontested amount" to the GoG of USD 25 million to settle all outstanding issues with the GoG, but the frequencies were not forthcoming, so the money was not paid. The GoG claims the amount was actually a fine for Westel's failure to meet its contractual obligations to develop their network. Furthermore, the GoG imposed an additional "spectrum fee" of USD 27.5 million late last year on the valuable 1800 and 1900 spectrum Westel insists it needs to be viable. Westel argues that these fees have been imposed retroactively without the due process required by their contract. Westel also claims the fees are arbitrary, since the five other wireless operators in Ghana have only been assessed USD 20 million each. Communications Minister Kan-Dapaah told DCM and EconOff that none of the wireless operators had paid the spectrum fee yet, and that no specific enforcement system or plans currently existed if they refused. The Minister said that since Westel has no established mobile service it couldn't expect to pay the same spectrum fees as those who do. 3. (C) Westel officials met unsuccessfully with President Kufuor earlier this year in a last-ditch attempt to reach an agreement (reftel). In June, however, the GoG granted formal licenses to mobile operators that were, in Westel's opinion, squatting on frequencies that the GoG was contractually obliged to provide to Westel, effectively locking Westel out of the mobile market. Even then, Westel felt its operation could be viable if the spectrum fee were dropped, but the GoG would not budge. According to Bill Taylor, WWI will not provide any new resources for the operation in Ghana and is considering pulling out all together, thus abandoning the 3000 land-based customers it already has. This could inconvenience other foreign investors, such as Newmont Gold Mining's $450 million dollar Bram-Ahafo project. According to Newmont's IT manager in Accra, Westel's service and equipment are the only viable option in Ghana for Newmont. State-owned Ghana Telecom (GT) does not provide comparable service, regardless of price. 4. (C) Bill Taylor fears the GoG could use GT to undermine Westel's existing operations. To support this he cites a string of incidents in which GT has either delayed or simply not complied with GoG directives governing the integration of Westel's land-based systems. Westel does, however, hold hope that a settlement can still be reached if the spectrum fee is rescinded. 5. (C) Comment. Although the facts in WWI's complaint are accurate, Westel also has some respnsibility for the current mess. It partnered with a questionable parastatel company and inadequately documented spectrum in its initial agreement. The problem was exacerbated when Westel agreed to pay the USD 25 million uncontested amount, which is universally seen as an admission of guilt. Westel's agreement to pay without a written agreement on spectrum only compounded its problem. Communications Minister Kan-Dapaah said he "would not stand in the way" if Westel wanted arbitration and added that the matter is now out of his hands. Nevertheless, Post will watch to ensure the GoG lives up to its contractual obligation to participate fully in international arbitration. End Comment. LANIER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04