US embassy cable - 04ABUDHABI3430

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABU DHABI 003430 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR NEA/ARP; NEA/PPD; NEA/RA; INR/R/MR; PA; 
INR/NESA; INR/B; IIP/G/NEA-SA 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE; NSC 
SECDEF FOR OASD/PA 
USCINCCENT FOR POLAD 
LONDON FOR GOLDRICH; PARIS FOR ZEYA; ALSO FOR MOC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP, KMDR, TC 
SUBJECT:  SPECIAL MEDIA REACTION: AL JAZEERA AND BEHEADINGS 
 
1.  SUMMARY:  COLUMNIST YOUSSEF IBRAHIM WROTE IN "AL ITTIHAD" 
THAT AL JAZEERA ABUSED ITS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION BY DEBATING 
WHETHER THE BEHEADING OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS IN IRAQ IS A 
JUSTIFIED METHOD OF RESISTANCE.  END SUMMARY. 
 
2.   UNDER THE HEADLINE "IS AL JAZEERA ALLOWED TO ADVOCATE 
BEHADINGS?" YOUSSEF M. IBRAHIM OPINED IN "AL ITTIHAD" 09/27: 
(ARABIC DAILY, ABU DHABI-BASED, SEMI-OFFICIAL, CIRCULATION 
85,000) 
 
"Imagine a television talk show where the hosts debate the merits 
and demerits of cannibalism, discussing whether it is good to 
kill people to eat their flesh, liver and hearts seriously, on 
the air on prime time. 
This past Tuesday, Feyssal Al Qassem, the infamous anchorman of 
Al Jazeera's program Counter Direction or "Al etijah Al Muaakess" 
went well beyond. 
Al Qassem hosted an Egyptian guest who over an entire hour was 
allowed to advocate, with sickening insistence, the beheading of 
hostages in Iraq as a legitimate act of resistance to what he 
called "these American dogs", regardless of whether the captives 
who are of many different nationalities, are military personnel, 
civilians, aid workers, or spies. 
They are all mercenaries, the Egyptian man screamed, as Al Qassem 
of the Al Jazeera network cheered him on. Truly, he who has no 
shame is not afraid. Arabism and Islam have nothing to do with 
such people. 
Where does Al Jazeera, and Al Qassem, think they are taking their 
Arab-speaking viewers, the young before the old, when they put on 
a talk show tantamount to issuing a fatwa, or edict, for murder 
in the name of Islam and God or Arab Nationalism? 
Does Al Qassem and his network appreciate how much damage they 
are doing to the religion of 1.2 billion Muslims, in addition to 
polluting the minds of many who watched him dish out this 
garbage? 
Al Qassem, whose program is already known as vile, loud, and 
messy, descended further into ignominious behavior. 
As the host of this unbelievable conversation, Al Qassem 
prompted, watched and blessed a so-called Egyptian political 
commentator arguing that people having their heads severed from 
their bodies in the most savage of ways is okay in the name of 
resistance to American occupation, and more important, to teach 
the Americans a lesson. 
How about what this teaches Arab children? What will they retain 
when they hear gratuitous invitations to kill, slash, hate, 
demean and ostracize "the other", including innocent journalists, 
aid workers, and United Nations officials, both men and women who 
came to help Arabs of Iraq. 
In Al Qassem's television show the opposing view guest, an Iraqi 
who argued hopelessly that such savagery is inhuman, was at a 
loss for words. Who would not be? 
There is a point where freedom of expression in the media stops 
and advocating irresponsible bloody savagery begins. Clearly Al 
Jazeera and Feyssal Al Qassem have no idea where that point is. 
Sponsors, mainly the government of Qatar,  should pull the plug 
on him, tell him he is fired, and then apologize to Arabs, 
Muslims and the whole civilized world for this smear. 
Like it or not, Al Jazeera has a huge following of Arabic- 
speaking people. This is a public trust. If a satellite channel 
claims to speak in the name of Arabs, its bosses and sponsors 
must make sure it does not spit where it eats. 
Al Jazeera has absolutely no right to allow ignorant, persons and 
reckless anchormen to further soil the reputation of all Muslims 
and Arabs by debating decapitation of human beings. There are no 
pros and cons here. And it is not the first time Al Jazeera has 
done that. For years it has given prime time to the rabid 
Egyptian so-called religious leader, Yusuf Al Qardawi who issued 
an edict allowing the killing of Americans in Iraq and wife 
beating. The other day Al Itihad, the Emirates Arabic daily, to 
its credit, denounced him as an ''ignorant man'' misleading 
Muslims. Abdelrahman Al Rashed, the manager of the competing 
Arabic network Al Arabiya, also to his credit, also took him on 
saying he is polluting minds and shaming Muslims. It is now up to 
the Qatari government to stop these charades. 
All this comes shortly after Al Azhar, the highest authority in 
Sunni Islam, condemned as a crime the kidnappings and beheadings 
of anyone being carried out in Iraq in the name of Islam. 
What's worse is that in an electronic voting on the issue a huge 
majority of Al Jazeera's viewers encouraged decapitation while 
less than 10 per cent voted against. 
The calamity that most of those who voted for it were Arabs and 
Muslims living in the West with free access to the internet, 
enjoying the full freedom of Western democracies. 
What does this say? That Al Jazeera has successfully polluted the 
minds of millions who should think differently, or that Arabs 
seriously suffer from schizophrenia. 
Is it a surprise that prominent psychiatrists say that 10 per 
cent of Arab children do not sleep for ten days after viewing 
such repulsive kidnap-and-behead-industry photos and images of 
people begging for their lives with masked men standing behind 
defaming the Holy Quran by holding it up high. 
If adults are confused, what are children supposed to be? A 
friend, a medical professional, wrote me the other day an email 
in which she said, "We do not need nation building. We need 
nation-rebuilding. This is a big, big issue''. 
Indeed as long as people such as Al Qassem are not checked, we 
are in trouble. 
" 
 
SISON