Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 01ABUJA2758 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 01ABUJA2758 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abuja |
| Created: | 2001-10-29 14:32:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON ETRD NI WTO USTR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ABUJA 002758 SIPDIS WHITE HOUSE PASS TO USTR E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, ETRD, NI, WTO, USTR SUBJECT: NIGERIA ON TRIPS, AGRICULTURE AND SERVICES REF: STATE 178945 1. EconOff delivered reftel information on 25 October to Mr. Y.T. Agah, Assistant Director responsible for Multilateral Affairs at the Federal Ministry of Commerce. Agah raised concern over geographical indication (GI) protections for indigenous plants, especially those with medicinal value, and the use of seeds from patented bio-engineered plants. 2. The problem with GI protection, Agah argued, was that currently any person could reengineer plants deriving from a limited geographical area, patent the results and be the sole beneficiaries of that plant's benefits. This system, he averred, does not necessarily benefit the geographic zone where the product originated. 3. Regarding the use of seeds from bio-engineered crops, Agah commented that the proposed regime, unlike the previous WIPO regime, was incompatible between the needs of the patent holder and the local community. Prohibiting the use of secondary seeds for subsistence farmers, who are not commercial users or market competitors, would disadvantage developing countries' food security. Agah mentioned there was OAU model legislation on breeders and farmers rights to address developing country concerns on this issue. 4. EconOff asked whether Nigeria had completed its review for the upcoming WTO round in Doha. Agah replied in the negative, but commented that Nigeria would support removal of subsidies and other protections on agriculture and would like to see progressive liberalization of services, particularly those Nigeria scheduled, such as banking, insurance, tourism, transport, and communications. The GON might decide to add professional services to its schedule of services. Nigeria would also press for progress on natural persons, which is necessary to maintain balance within the services agreement, Agah said. Andrews
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04