Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04THEHAGUE2369 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04THEHAGUE2369 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2004-09-17 15:15:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PINR PHUM CH NL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 002369 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/10/2014 TAGS: PREL, PINR, PHUM, CH, NL, EUN SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/EU/CHINA: DUTCH LOOKING FOR ACTION DURING HUMAN RIGHTS VISIT IN CHINA AND TIBET Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer for reasons 1.4(B) AN D (D). 1. SUMMARY: (C) Dutch EU Presidency representative Piet de Klerk, Special Ambassador for Human Rights, will be in Tibet from September 20 to 23 and Beijing on September 24 for the next round of the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue. Poloff discussed the confidential agendas with Gerri Willems of the MFA's China office (please protect) on September 17. She noted that this visit takes place against the backdrop of the EU's grappling with the question of lifting the China Arms Embargo. Willems added that positive Chinese gestures in the human rights field would be "very welcome." End Summary. 2. (C) Dutch Special Ambassador for Human Rights Piet de Klerk travels to Tibet and China from September 20 to 24 to participate in the next round of the semi-annual EU-China Human Rights dialogue. He will have an in-brief at the Dutch Embassy in Beijing on September 19. Gerri Willems of the MFA's China office (please protect) characterized the trip as unusual since de Klerk would spend three full days in Tibet, instead of the usual one. She also noted that having the talks against the backdrop of the China Arms Embargo discussions gave them additional significance, although she did not indicate that the issue itself would be on de Klerk's agenda. She recalled that the Chinese refuse to link human rights issues to the embargo, while the EU has long tried to take a "two track" approach. 3. (C) In Tibet, de Klerk's agenda currently includes meetings with government officials, a visit to an EU funded project, visits to one or two monasteries, and an NGO reception -- although Willems said this was all subject to change depending on what Beijing would allow. The NGO reception, she added, would most likely involve "development" NGOs, rather than "straightforward human rights NGOs." 4. (C) In Beijing, the agenda should follow the normal track, Willems said, with reviews of "issues of common concern," the "UN process," and EU-China "cooperation in legal matters." Willems said that over the last year the EU has been pressing China harder for concrete action in human rights, observing that "dialogue" is good, but only up to a certain point. Willems offered that it was her impression that the Chinese were generally becoming more and more "attuned to the international scene.... Progress is a millimeter by millimeter process," she added. Finally, she suggested that "the time would be right for China to make positive gestures in the human rights field." COMMENT 5. (C) Although she did not state so explicitly, a "positive gesture" on human rights would clearly strengthen the hand of those in the EU pushing to lift the China Arms Embargo during the current Dutch presidency. In previous meetings on the Embargo, de Klerk and others in the MFA dealing with China on a regular basis have argued that China's human rights "progress" in the 15 years since Tiananmen ought to be recognized and encouraged through reciprocal gestures. SOBEL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04