Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04PRETORIA4199 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04PRETORIA4199 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Pretoria |
| Created: | 2004-09-17 04:55:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ETRD EWWT EAID ECON PINR PTER SF |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PRETORIA 004199 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR AF/S/TCRAIG AND KGAITHER E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, EWWT, EAID, ECON, PINR, PTER, SF SUBJECT: DURBAN PORT - IMPROVEMENTS, CONCESSION, SECURITY (U) Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect accordingly. Not for Internet distribution. 1. (SBU) SUMMARY. Infrastructure and process improvements as well as new equipment are increasing efficiency at Durban Port according to Mervyn Chetty, Executive Manager of Corporate Strategy and Continuous Improvement at South African Port Operations (SAPO). New cranes are expected to double capacity and new scanners are on their way. The Container Terminal is expected to be concessioned by the end of the year with SAPO as part of a joint partnership operating and managing the Terminal. Although, Security at the Container Terminal appears adequate, security lapses at Maydon Wharf are still evident. END SUMMARY 2. (U) A multi-billion rand project titled "Development 2005" is addressing the current capacity constraints at the Port of Durban. SAPO Executive Manager of Corporate Strategy and Continuous Improvement Mervyn Chetty told Econoff that the project addresses his top three priorities to improve the port's people, processes and equipment. ----------------- PEOPLE IMROVEMENT ----------------- 3. (SBU) Chetty acknowledged Durban's dismal delays in recent history. However, he said that much of this could be attributed to the fact that the people on the ground lacked the proper tools for the job. For instance, Chetty points out that in 2002, just 10 percent of all container traffic was unloaded and stacked at a rate of more than 16 containers per hour. Two years later, after increasing its straddle carrier fleet to move and stack containers, 84 percent of container traffic is now being moved at a rate of more than 16 containers per hour. 4. (U) Chetty also pointed out that while global container traffic is increasing by 6 percent each year, Durban is experiencing 8 percent growth. To handle the container growth, shipping lines are using larger ships. Unfortunately, Chetty says that Durban has an insufficient number of qualified open-license pilots to steer larger ships into port. This creates delays despite improvements in capacity within the port. Chetty is working closely with the National Ports Authority (NPA), which is responsible for training harbor pilots. ------------------- PROCESS IMPROVEMENT ------------------- 5. (U) Chetty also said that improvements could be immediately realized with slight modifications in processes. For example, the zig-zag configuration of the Durban Container Terminal's (DCT) quay wall accommodates only one crane for adjacent berth numbers 202 and 203. This prevents ships docked concurrently at the two berths from unloading simultaneously. While one ship is unloaded, the other ship waits, inefficiently occupying limited berth space. In addition, the stacking configuration at these berths only allowed a maximum of 10,000 containers. After some analysis, Chetty staggered the arrival and departure times of ships assigned to 202 and 203 so that while one ship was docking and securing moorings, the other was being unloaded. This allows the DCT to turn ships around much more quickly. In addition, Chetty's modifications of the stacking configuration for containers - taking them higher and storing them further down the quay wall- increased the storage capacity to 15,000 containers. 6. (SBU) Chetty is also working with U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspectors assigned to Durban as part of the Container Security Initiative (CSI) to improve the process of scanning containers at Durban's lone scanner. Members of the CSI Team at Durban Port told Econoff that the disjointed process for identifying and delivering a container from the Terminal to the scanner is causing delays resulting in many containers being short-shipped (missing their assigned ship). They said that when CSI identifies a container, DCT employees retrieve it from the stack and deliver it to the Terminal gate. The shipping agent must then send a truck from one side of the harbor to the Terminal to transport the container 100 meters to the scanner. After being scanned, the truck returns the container back to the Terminal. DCT employees must then retrieve it from the gate and return it to the stack. In addition to the transportation inefficiencies, the process of moving the container to and from the secure terminal requires additional documentation, which can add to the delays. The CSI team has suggested to Chetty that DCT workers convey the container from its stack directly to the scanner and back to the stack. --------------------- EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENT --------------------- 7. (U) Durban has recently added three ship-to-shore gantry cranes, increasing its total to 16 and bringing the port more in line with international best practices that call for one crane per 100 meters of quay wall. Chetty said these new cranes will allow the port to accommodate an expected increase in container traffic from the current 1.2 million TEU (twenty foot equivalent units) per year to 2.4 million TEU per year. 8. (SBU) In addition, Chetty said that the South African Revenue Service (SARS), which oversees Customs issues, has purchased seven new security scanners. Three of these will be allocated to the Durban Port and the other four will be placed at border crossing posts. Currently, Durban has just one scanner, which is located outside the Container Terminal. This creates huge bottlenecks as the South African Police Service (SAPS), the NPA, and the U.S. CSI team send containers to be scanned for illegal contraband. By late morning, the single lane Bayhead Road is backed up by over a mile, creating gridlock at the Terminal. The addition of extra scanners will allow a dedicated scanner to be located inside of the DCT. Chetty could not provide Econoff with a definitive delivery date. ------------------- OTHER PORT PROJECTS ------------------- 9. (SBU) Durban has just completed a major expansion of the quay wall at the port's Point area on the city side of the harbor. The new expansion will accommodate three more berths which will be used for multi-purpose cargo, relocating from Pier 1 (adjacent to the Durban Container Terminal) This addition will allow the DCT to expand into Pier 1 and increase its capacity by facilitating more container space at the Terminal. Chetty said the berths should be operational by early 2007 after the new area has settled and the surface been paved. Chetty said that the NPA is also considering annexing Salisbury Island (adjacent to Pier 1) into the DCT expansion. In addition, the Passenger Terminal will be relocated to the new Point quay wall where tourists will have access to the oceanfront and the new uShaka Marine World theme park. Port authorities also speculate that the Port may expand into the space currently occupied by Durban International Airport if the airport is moved north to the Dube Trade Port. 10. (U) The widening of the Durban harbor entrance is also scheduled to begin early next year. The project will widen the channel into Durban Bay from about 130 meters to 220 meters by relocating the breakwater (North Pier). At the same time, the entrance channel and subsequent channels within the Port will be deepened from about 12.8 meters to as much as 18 meters to allow access for larger container ships capable of carrying 6,500 TEUs. 11. (U) Chetty also recognized that congestion is a problem on Maydon Wharf Road and Bayhead Road into the Durban Container Terminal. He said that the city is scheduled to begin construction on an interchange from Bayhead Road to the freeway, allowing port authorities to close public access to the Maydon Wharf Road. In addition, plans are in the works to widen Bayhead Road into the Terminal and to create parking along the side of the road. ------------------------------------ DURBAN CONTAINER TERMINAL CONCESSION ------------------------------------ 12. (SBU) The SAG would like to have its tender for a concession of the Durban Container Terminal in place by the end of 2004. Chetty believes that SAPO's improved performance over the past 18 months is proof that it can effectively operate the port. What SAPO lacks, according to Chetty, is management experience. A senior Public Enterprise official confirmed to Econoff that the concession of the DCT will be a joint partnership with SAPO. (NOTE: US company CSX is expected to be a major contender for the terminal concession. END NOTE) -------- SECURITY -------- 13. (SBU) The NPA has recently installed a high fence around much of the port. A second checkpoint at the Point has improved access control to those berths. However, Rob Gardner, an agent from ISS-Voight Shipping and former- President of the Shipping Lines Association, told Econoff that in his opinion, fencing is an inadequate security measure. He said that closed-circuit television (CCTV), human security, and restricted access protocols are needed to create a more secure port. 14. (SBU) Private vehicles can easily access the Maydon Wharf area. Econoff observed shipping lines unloading containers on the street along Maydon Wharf, which could be accessed by unauthorized persons. Although the NPA has required shipping lines to hire security to prevent access to ships and cargo, Econoff observed instances where the security was lax, inattentive, and sometimes not present. Gardner explained that the NPA does not have much leverage in enforcing the security plans. If shipping lines fail to provide adequate security then the NPA is responsible to do so. Gardner said he did not think the NPA has the capacity to provide security. In addition, it is difficult for Port authorities to restrict access to the area because private companies are located there. 15. (SBU) Durban's Container Terminal has much tighter security than the rest of the port. Bongi Nzuza, Protection Services Manager at the Terminal, told Econoff that in his four years at the Terminal is has removed dishonest employees and placed cameras at the entrance to photograph drivers and containers entering and exiting the Terminal. Nzuza said he has also increased training for his security staff and that, as of mid-July 2004, only credentialed individuals may enter the Terminal. Nzuza is also looking into implementing CCTV cameras throughout the Terminal. He said that there have been no thefts of containers in the last five years, something that was previously commonplace. Nzuza also noted an increased police presence since the Container Security Initiative was implemented in December 2003. FRAZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04