Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ABUDHABI3209 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ABUDHABI3209 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abu Dhabi |
| Created: | 2004-09-16 06:04:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PHUM PREL TC IN NP RP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
null
Diana T Fritz 02/05/2007 05:36:14 PM From DB/Inbox: Search Results
Cable
Text:
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABU DHABI 03209
SIPDIS
CXABU:
ACTION: DCM
INFO: POL AMB
DISSEMINATION: DCM
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: AMB:MSISON
DRAFTED: POL:SRADDANT
CLEARED: A/DCM:HOWINDECKER CG:JDAVIS POL:JMAYBURY
VZCZCADI691
RR RUEHC RUEHDE RUEHNE RUEHKT RUEHML RUEHCG
RUEHZM
DE RUEHAD #3209/01 2600604
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 160604Z SEP 04
FM AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5945
INFO RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 4339
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 1224
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 0024
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA 0592
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 0116
RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ABU DHABI 003209 SIPDIS STATE FOR G/TIP, INL, DRL, SA/INS, NEA/RA, AND NEA/ARP E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/14/14 TAGS: PHUM, PREL, TC, IN, NP, RP SUBJECT: TIP CASES SHOW UAE STILL CHALLENGED REF: DUBAI 1267 1. (U) This is an action request for G/TIP and NEA/ARPI country desk, please see paragraph 9. 2. (C) SUMMARY: A number of recent trafficking cases in the UAE point to the continuing challenges in the TIP arena here. There is a growing difference in views between Dubai police and public prosecutors on how to best handle trafficking cases. Police say they want to break the criminal rings that facilitate trafficking by prosecuting traffickers. Prosecutors, on the other hand, prefer to deport traffickers and prostitutes and focus on measures that will prevent their return to the UAE. This quandary between the Ministries of Interior and Justice on how to best combat the UAE's human trafficking problem will hopefully be resolved once a new anti-TIP law is approved, possibly later this year. ------------ ANITA'S CASE ------------ 3. (U) On August 30, the UAE press reported on the story of a 31-year-old Indian woman who was brought to the UAE under false promises of employment, then forced into prostitution. "Anita" claimed an Indian named "Nasser" recruited her in March for a Dubai hospital job that would pay her more than twice her Indian salary. She was charged the equivalent of ten months of her UAE salary to "process travel documents." Upon reaching Dubai, Anita was immediately forced into prostitution. After about four months she was "sold" for about $1,600 and transferred to Abu Dhabi. She escaped a month later during one of the regular transfers of women between apartments. A family sheltered her until she was able to get assistance from the Indian Consulate. ------------------------------------ POLICE FRUSTRATED THEY CAN'T DO MORE ------------------------------------ 4. (C) On August 30, Poloff spoke with the Director of the Dubai Human Rights Care Department, Lt. Col. Mohammed Abdulla Al Murr, about this case. Al Murr said his department was not involved with the case, and expressed frustration over the lack of open communications between his office and source country embassies and consulates. He said that he and his deputies have met with a number of source country missions over the past few months to exchange views on the problem of human trafficking, offer police assistance with both assisting victims and pursuing traffickers, and inform missions that his department has branches in every police station in Dubai. He said he provided all missions his department's 24-hour victims' hotline phone number and directed them to the Human Rights Care Department's website for more information. 5. (C) Al Murr said he was also frustrated with the Dubai Public Prosecutor's office, and specifically with policies set by Dubai Attorney General Ibrahim Bu Melha. He said that Dubai police regularly arrest traffickers and send cases to public prosecutors, only to have the charges dropped and traffickers quietly deported without trial or publicity. He said Bu Melha prefers to deport traffickers and victims alike, rather than following the better (albeit more time- and resource-consuming) law enforcement practices that would break the criminal rings. He said that this disconnect has been heating up over the past few months. 6. (C) Bu Melha has told us (see reftel) that, in the past, Public Prosecution has regularly put both prostitutes and traffickers on trial, convicted them, and kept them in jail for a short time before "pardoning" and deporting them. In April, Bu Melha again said that the most effective punishment was to deport traffickers and ensure that they never returned to Dubai. (Note: Police and MOI officials confirmed that, while "repeat offenders" used to be able to return to Dubai shortly after deportation, they no longer can due to implementation of iris recognition scanning of all deportees and "new" visitors from source countries. Since scanning began in March 2003, over 11,000 potential illegal immigrants have been turned away at the border. End Note.) In his conversations with us earlier this year, Bu Melha noted that limited jail space was also an important consideration. Additionally, according to current UAE law, prosecutors must treat prostitutes as criminals except when coercion could be clearly proven. Bu Melha said the only way around this practice would be to either change UAE law, or for his office to institutionalize a "creative approach" to prosecuting cases, such as routinely pardoning prostitutes prior to their cases coming to court, while following through with the trials of their traffickers. This way, the victims can go home while their "bosses" do jail time in Dubai. Bu Melha indicated that he would not oppose such an approach, but that it would need to be coordinated with various Dubai government entities. ------------------------- INDIAN CONSULATE COMMENTS ------------------------- 7. (U) Poloff spoke with K.M. Venugopalan, a vice consul at India's Consulate in Dubai, about trafficking trends. He said that the consulate sees cases similar to Anita's situation once or twice a month in Dubai, and somewhat less frequently in Abu Dhabi. Many of the victims come from India's Kerala state. The consulate has asked Kerala to verify all employment offers made to single women before they are allowed to travel to the UAE. He said traffickers employ individuals to act as recruitment agents to identify young single women and convince them to accept "job offers" with temptingly high salaries. The agents often use false names and prevent victims from learning other identifying information so that, if victims do escape, they can offer authorities very little information that could lead them to their traffickers. For this reason, Venugopalan said the consulate rarely calls the police, since he believes victims do not offer enough information about traffickers to open an investigation. Rather, the consulate writes to the local police station and MFA after it assists the victims. He said the consulate rarely receives responses from the MFA, and on the few occasions that police stations have responded, they have done so only after a lapse of several months. -------------------- TIP REPORTS INCREASE -------------------- 8. (C) Since Anita's story broke, the press has run three more stories on women who escaped from prostitution rings, and another report of 23 Pakistani boys who were repatriated after working in the UAE as camel jockeys. We also learned of similar situations during meetings with the Embassy of Nepal in Abu Dhabi and Philippine Consulate in Dubai. All the victims mentioned thought they were coming to the UAE for legitimate work, not knowing they would be forced into prostitution. --------------- RECOMMENDATIONS --------------- 9. (C) Conflicting approaches between the Ministries of Justice and Interior regarding how to handle traffickers and their victims may be resolved once new anti-TIP legislation is adopted, possibly as early as later this year. Interior has formed a special committee to review existing laws related to human trafficking, and Justice agreed in February to review an anti-TIP model law provided by G/TIP (Interior is reviewing the same text). Post will continue to work closely with the UAEG at all levels to encourage passage of the legislation as soon as possible. 10. (U) Action Request: Post also requests G/TIP and NEA/ARPI desk to forward text, preferably in Arabic, of any existing anti-trafficking legislation used in other Arabic and/or Muslim countries. Finally, Post will test UAEG receptivity to receiving assistance from U.S. trafficking, legal and law enforcement experts as it drafts its anti- trafficking law. Involving an outside team of seasoned specialists could help the UAE move past its Justice/Interior disconnect more quickly, and ensure that the UAEG has the legal tool it needs to help combat its serious trafficking problem. SISON 5
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04