Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04QUITO2464 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04QUITO2464 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Quito |
| Created: | 2004-09-10 19:50:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | SENV EAID ECON EFIS ETRD PGOV PREL EC Environment |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 002464 SIPDIS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED C O R R E C T E D COPY - PARA MARKINGS DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS USAID E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: SENV, EAID, ECON, EFIS, ETRD, PGOV, PREL, EC, Environment SUBJECT: GALAPAGOS PARK LEADERSHIP POTENTIALLY DESTABILIZED 1. (U)Summary: The status of the leadership of the Galapagos National Park (GNP) is uncertain, with Park Director Edwin Naula facing possible dismissal. There are political motives behind the change and we will continue to press for stability. The US Mission has expressed concern at the highest levels of the government on the impact of continued polarization of the park directorship on the sustainability of donor investments, and reiterated the need for technically qualified staff to lead the program. A continued ebbing of park management undermines international conservation efforts, threatens the archipelago's unique and fragile ecosystems, and raises concerns on Ecuador's long-term ability to independently manage its vital natural resources. Our efforts to prevent further instability in the leadership may be frustrated; we continue to press for the conservation and protection of the Park. End Summary. Possible Replacement of Park Director ------------------------------------- 2. (U)Rumors of a park director replacement have been swirling for several weeks. During this period, the Ambassador expressed concerns about park stability with the Minister of the Environment. This same message has been conveyed by AID with ministry officials and the donor community. 3. (U)On September 7, the Ambassador met with Gutierrez to express concerns about the importance of institutional stability for the Park, donor concerns over rumors about the possible removal of the Park Director, the importance of avoiding politicizing the park leadership, and sustainability of USG investments. Gutierrez said he had agreed about the importance of Park conservation. 4. (U)Naula has alleged there are political motives for his removal. He told the ADCM that he had refused to step down unless Gutierrez orders him directly. Later the day, however, press also reported unconfirmed rumors that Gutierrez had in fact ordered the Minister of Environment to fire Naula. That has still not happened, fueling uncertainty. 5. (U)GOE sources say a decision will be made shortly on the removal of Naula. One candidate for the job is Fausto Cepeda, a former park director who until recently served as an advisor to the fishing sector in the Galapagos. He would not be ideal; some believe Cepeda would be biased towards the fishing sector over conservation. 6. (U)The Galapagos Park Rangers Association has contacted our consular agent in the Galapagos to voice concern over the politicization of the park and requested USG intervention. 7. (U)The Embassy has repeatedly cautioned the GOE that the director position must not be used as a political tool. Jimmy Carter made the same points to Gutierrez during an August visit. We support the full stability and protection of this unique environment. The position of park director should be predicated solely upon qualified technical experience. USG Assistance -------------- 8. (U)The Galapagos has had 8 park directors in the last 18 months. The constant turn-over has hampered the successful development of GOE conservation programs. USG programs, foreign investment and multilateral donations have also been adversely affected. The ultimate victim of this instability has been the Park and its welfare. 9. (U)Fishermen from Baja California, Mexico are currently visiting Galapagos fishing cooperatives under an exchange program financed with USAID's marine reserve project. This exchange is aimed at reducing conflict between environmental and fishing interests. The Mexicans are sharing a world-class fisheries management model that has successfully bridged the interests of government, fisheries, and environmental groups. Additionally, two new USG initiatives are under way: a) the creation of an environmental prosecutor unit in the Galapagos Province and b) strengthening local government institutions through the Galapagos Municipal Consortia. 10. (U)USAID co-chairs the donor round table and a one-day meeting will take place on September 17 to discuss the Galapagos situation at the request of UNDP. In addition to the international donor community, the Ministry of Environment has been invited to attend. 11. (SBU) Comment: Despite our best efforts, it appears the President may have decided to remove the Park Director. Also, there are political motives for this change, as the President seeks to mollify the political opposition (in this case we suspect PSC leader Leon Febres Cordero) which is calling for his impeachment. We will continue to press to ensure that any new director is qualified and focused on conservation. End comment. KENNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04