Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04LJUBLJANA823 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04LJUBLJANA823 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ljubljana |
| Created: | 2004-09-02 08:12:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV PINR SI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LJUBLJANA 000823 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, PINR, SI SUBJECT: TV SLOVENIJA AIRS FIRST UNOFFICIAL DEBATE BETWEEN PM ROP AND OPPOSITION LEADER JANSA Sensitive but Unclassified -- Please Protect Accordingly 1. (U) SUMMARY: On 30 August, TV Slovenija broadcast a long- planned confrontation between PM Anton Rop and opposition leader and Slovene Democratic Party [SDS] President Janez Jansa. The two leaders introduced different "diagnoses" of Slovenia's success in the last four years. Jansa was very critical of Slovenia's slow development in the fields of economy and social security. He said the government did not fulfill several promises, especially on privatization and health care reform. Jansa did, however, mention some successful initiatives, highlighting foreign and defense policy and e-government initiatives in the areas of taxation and the judicial system. As expected, Rop refuted all criticism and claimed the government had fulfilled its major goals. He highlighted economic growth that was 1.5 to 2 percent higher than the EU average. One characteristic shared by both politicians during the broadcast was an unwillingness to answer concrete questions raised by the moderator. END SUMMARY. JANSA ----- 2. (U) Jansa began his assessment of the past four years by focusing on positive accomplishments of the current government, mentioning foreign policy successes and the termination of conscription into the Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF). He said these were issues where the government "listened to our [Opposition Coalition] proposals". He also mentioned computerized income tax collection and introduction of a computerized land register as steps forward. 3. (U) As criticism, Jansa mentioned Slovenia's slow economic development and delays in privatization that will prevent the country from catching up with the most developed countries of the EU within the next ten years. Jansa said the country's unfulfilled goals could be achieved more quickly if political changes occur. In the field of foreign policy, Jansa only criticized Slovenia's policy towards Croatia, calling for a more active engagement. In this regard he echoed a proposal by the right-leaning political forum Assembly for the Republic (AFTR) on creating a joint Slovene - Croatian commission to deal with border issues. On a more global scale, Jansa suggested that tensions between the U.S. and Europe are abating, obviating the need for Slovenia to take sides between the so-called "New Europe" and "Old Europe." He said that Slovenia should follow the lead within the EU of countries like Portugal or Luxembourg, both of which he says are influential, despite their small size. ROP --- 4. (U) Rop refuted all criticisms levied against his Government and said that he is very optimistic about Slovenia's future development. Regarding the past four years, he said Slovenian citizens can be proud of results that represent accomplishments of more than just one government or a single political party. Concerning economic growth, he noted that Slovenia had reached its goal of exceeding the EU average by 1.5 to 2 percent. Rop argued that the GoS policy toward Croatia is, indeed, active and he mentioned Slovenia's reliance on its new membership in the EU to block Croatia's proclamation of an ecological - fishing zone that would inure to Slovenia's detriment. He also mentioned positive movement in handling high profile issues surrounding Ljubljanska Banka and Yugoslav succession. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS -------------------- 5. (U) Both Rop and Jansa dodged certain questions posed by the moderator. Rop refused to highlight a single mistake of the Government under his leadership. He just said, generally, that certain matters could have been carried out faster and differently. Jansa on the other hand did not answer a question directly about whether a coalition between SDS or the opposition Coalition Slovenija (which includes the center-right Nova Slovenija (NSi)) and Rop's LDS would be possible. Jansa said that it is good for any country or party not to hold power continuously. Rop responded that LDS would not exclude any particular party in advance of election results. ELECTION PREDICTIONS -------------------- 6. (U) When asked to predict the results of the October 3 national parliamentary election, Jansa said that SDS will be the strongest party and that - together with NSi - it will replicate the results of the European Parliament election. SDS and NSi won four seats in the European Parliament, while LDS and its left-wing coalition partner United List of Social Democrats (ZLSD) won only three. Jansa said he would resign as SDS President if his party does not improve its results from the 2000 elections. Rop said simply that he expects an LDS victory and that any other result would be a fiasco. COMMENT ------- 7. (U) This televised debate was seen by many Slovenes as the start of an election campaign season that commences officially on 3 September. Jansa's criticisms came directly from the agenda developed by his "shadow cabinet" for Slovenia's future. The parliamentary interpellation motion launched by the Opposition Coalition against Rop's government started August 31. The interpellation motion is widely seen as a pre-election tool that Jansa hopes to use to his political advantage. 8. (SBU) Slovene voters are traditionally seen as tending to vote "against" what they oppose, rather than "in favor" of what they like. In the past, Jansa has performed well in election years but has lost support in the immediate lead-up to election day because of his inability to consolidate the parties on the right. Jansa's chances to become PM will increase if he can effect such a consolidation to counter an LDS that is likely to remain the strongest party in Slovenia. On the other hand, the big challenge for the LDS will be to increase voter turnout. Even that might not be enough for Rop this time, though, if the parties on the right can unify before the election. END COMMENT. YOUNG NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04