Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04THEHAGUE2138 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04THEHAGUE2138 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2004-08-26 15:01:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL NL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 002138
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/24/2014
TAGS: PREL, NL, EUN
SUBJECT: INFORMAL EU FOREIGN MINSTERS MEETING (GYMNICH),
SEP 3-4: DISCUSSION WITH DUTCH
REF: A. (A) STATE 182534
B. (B) THE HAGUE 02074
Classified By: POLCOUNS A. SCHOFER FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) and (D)
1. (C) Summary. MFA Political Affairs Department Director
Jaap Werner told emboffs that although the Gymnich agenda
must remain open until very shortly before the meeting, he
expects that it will cover ASEM, the Middle East, Iraq, Iran,
the Balkans, and the Sudan. On ASEM the Dutch are looking
for a compromise solution that will combine lower level
Burmese participation with positive human rights action by
the Burmese and possible additional EU sanctions on Burma.
At the Gymnich the Foreign Ministers will discuss the state
of play and the EU bottom line, but Werner continued to
indicate strong EU interest in the ASEM taking place. The
Middle East discussion will probably result in further EU
urging of Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and possibly something
on settlements. The Dutch may also use the occasion to
discuss the Forum for the Future bilaterally with key FMs.
On Iraq the focus will be a response to the Annan letter on
financing for a UN protection force. On Iran the Ministers
will be briefed by the "EU-3" on their conclusions. The
Balkans discussion will be about the status of EU partnership
efforts in the region. Discussion of the Sudan will depend
on the assessment of the situation there at that point.
Turkey and the China arms embargo are not on the formal
agenda, but the Dutch intend to use the occasion to probe for
the degree of member state commitment to lifting the arms
embargo. End Summary.
2. (U) PolCouns and Poloff met with Werner on 26 August to
discuss the EU's Sept 3-4 Gymnich using reftel A
instructions. Werner said that the agenda for the subject
meeting is generally known but still subject to chance
depending on events. Polcouns made the points in reftel A at
appropriate times in the discussion.
ASEM
----
3. (C) The EU's assembled Foreign Ministers will hear a
report from Dutch Presidency Special Envoy Van den Broek on
his visits and contacts with Asian and European governments
concerning the issue of Burmese attendance at the Asia-Europe
Meeting (ASEM), scheduled for October 8-9. The Dutch are
looking for a compromise that will be a "package" of elements
to include some or all of (a) lower level Burmese
participation (minister or lower), (b) strengthening EU
sanctions on Burma to assure that a message of continuing
disapproval is sent, (c) discussion of Burmese human rights
performance at the ASEM, and (d) some significant Burmese
action demonstrating progress, such as the release from house
arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi. Asian governments are adamant
about Burmese participation and are being told that they have
to help by putting pressure on the Burmese to take such a
step prior to the ASEM.
4. (C) Werner clearly indicated that the ASEM is likely to
come off, however much of the package is successfully
assembled. It would be "disastrous for EU-Asia relations,"
he said, if the meeting were canceled. Those EU governments
with the strongest domestic pressure to be stern with the
Burmese -- UK, Netherlands and Denmark -- all seem to be
moving toward making the summit possible (the UK at least
partly because PM Blair does not plan to attend and therefore
would not have to be seen at the same table anyway).
Middle East/Forum for the Future
--------------------------------
5. (C) Werner did not believe that discussion of the Middle
East would take up much time at the Gymnich, mainly because
there are few perceived openings for EU involvement in the
region and no new ideas for EU action on the table for
discussion. A statement might include something about urging
follow-through on Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and perhaps
something on the settlements.
6. (C) Werner said that the Dutch may use the FM gathering to
explore positions on the Forum for the Future and the
possibility of The Netherlands hosting the event. The Dutch
remain unsure of the degree of EU member state support for
the Forum, though Werner admitted it would be odd for the big
member states also at the G-8 to now try to disassociate from
the process. A visit to The Hague next week by French FM
Barnier provides a good occasion to discuss the Forum.
(Werner said it would be very useful to have a US response to
the concerns about the Forum raised by FM Bot with Ambassador
Sobel (ref B) prior to these discussions.) He responded very
positively to the possibility of Moroccan co-sponsorship of
an event in The Hague, noting that this would be add an
additional point in favor of hosting.
Iraq
----
6. (C) The EU's "exploratory mission" to Iraq (headed by MFA
Deputy Political Director Hermann Schaaper) will report its
findings to the Gymnich. Werner hopes the FMs will endorse
whatever the results of that mission are and perhaps have
some Commission proposals on the table to consider as well.
He cautioned that the EU would probably not be able to take
concrete actions until October or November, however. He
admitted that the Commission has been difficult on this
issue, partly because of the timing coincident with a
lame-duck Commission, but also because of tensions between
the Council Secretariat and the Commission as the EU's
foreign relations structure undergoes change.
7. (C) Ministers will discuss funding for the UN protection
force in Iraq. The Gymnich may agree on a reply to the Annan
letter requesting funds, though Werner was not sure that
member states will have prepared themselves for that in time.
Iran
----
8. (C) The "EU-3" (UK, German, France) will brief the FMs on
their discussions with Iran regarding its nuclear program.
Werner does not know what they will say, and described the
EU-3 as "secretive" about their interaction with Iran to
date. He wondered if the EU-3 themselves are having trouble
reaching a consensus about conclusions and recommendations.
If they have indeed reached a dead end, he suggested, the
EU-3 might be considering whether it was time to return the
whole problem to the EU.
9. (C) In any case Werner expected the Gymnich to agree on a
strong message urging Iran to meet its commitments. He asked
for further details on the US position, e.g., what time line
does "as soon as possible" (para 8 ref A) imply, and what
should be the result of the September IAEA Board meeting.
Balkans
-------
10. (C) Ministers will be briefed on the status of the
Serbia-Montenegro stability agreement negotiations, which
have encountered difficulties with different conditions in
Serbia vs. Montenegro. The agreement must deal with this
without implying any signal of separation. Discussion will
probably not be at the level of the issues raised in ref A.
On Kosovo the Ministers will discuss the status of the
Standards process, which Werner agreed is important to the
long-term project of integrating Kosovo into European
institutions.
Sudan
-----
11. (C) Ministers will make an assessment of the situation.
Werner noted that the Gymnich timing is fortunate, coming
just after the UN assessment and just before the UN
discussion of next steps. The EU expects a mixed assessment,
progress on some fronts, not on others. FM Bot will visit
Khartoum after the Gymnich but before the regular Sep GAERC
on Sep. 13-14.
Other issues
------------
12. (C) The China arms embargo is not expected to be on the
agenda. Werner confirmed Bot's indication ref B of some
movement on the issue. The Dutch will use the occasion for
bilateral informal discussions to assess how strongly France
and others are attached to lifting the embargo as soon as
possible. The US message has been heard, though, and
although the EU member states generally want to get rid of
the embargo, whether it is done in December "depends (to some
extent) on the amount of collateral damage it would cause."
The success of the summit is still a major consideration:
the lifting of the embargo was to have been a "present" for
the Chinese, and if that is not available, some other present
will have to be found.
13. (C) Turkey also will not be discussed. It is, Werner
said, "too soon" with the Commission report not due until
October. The Dutch intend to follow the process step by
step, waiting for the report, reacting to the report after it
is issued, making the decision in December.
RUSSEL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04