Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BRATISLAVA793 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BRATISLAVA793 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bratislava |
| Created: | 2004-08-26 14:44:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ENRG ETTC KNNP MNUC PARM PREL TRGY LO IAEA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BRATISLAVA 000793 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ENRG, ETTC, KNNP, MNUC, PARM, PREL, TRGY, LO, IAEA SUBJECT: SLOVAK RESPONSE TO ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL REF: STATE 180283 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION. (SBU) Per reftel, econoff delivered non-paper and discussed single talking point with Mr. Krizan, from the MFA's Department of European Security and Arms Control. Krizan indicated that the GOS supports the additional protocol (AP) but thought that the UK and Austria were working on a new draft of the proposal that would be more amenable to the four skeptical countries. He further commented that the AP was in line with the EU strategy and he was therefore unsure why France was still balking at the issue. It is also the GOS's impression that Argentina may be more willing to reconsider its position but that Brazil was not likely to alter its opinion on the AP. Krizan agreed that the GOS would lobby France and Russia on behalf of the UK/Austrian plan, but not Argentina and Brazil with whom Slovakia has little influence. THAYER NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04