Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04QUITO2327 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04QUITO2327 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Quito |
| Created: | 2004-08-24 21:01:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ETRD EPET ECON EC Oil Sector |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 QUITO 002327 SIPDIS DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR BENNETT HARMAN E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/24/2014 TAGS: ETRD, EPET, ECON, EC, Oil Sector SUBJECT: THE PROCURADOR STRIKES BACK AT OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM REF: 8/23/04 MEMMOTT-HARMAN TELCONS Classified By: Ambassador Kristie A. Kenney, Reason 1.5 (b) and (d) 1. (U) See paragraph 11 for an action request. 2. (C) Summary. Ecuador's Procurador (Solicitor General) may be seeking to terminate Occidental Petroleum's (Oxy) Block 15 participation contract for alleged violations of the hydrocarbon law. If the allegations are upheld, Oxy's Block 15 contract could be terminated and the assets would revert to state-owned Petroecuador. The Procurador initiated his investigation of Oxy shortly after Oxy won a $75 million international arbitration award against the GOE. The Ambassador conveyed the USG's extreme displeasure at this action to the Ministers of Trade, Economy, Foreign Affairs and Government, as well as to President Gutierrez. Though there may be technical grounds to justify the Procurador's action, it smacks of retaliation. While criticizing the GOE for the abuse of its legal system and explaining that it could result in serious trade implications, the Ambassador also encouraged the GOE to discuss with Oxy an amicable resolution to all its pending issues with the GOE. End Summary. Retaliation or Coincidence? --------------------------- 3. (U) The Procurador (Solicitor General) admitted to the press that he started the investigation of Occidental Petroleum (Oxy) shortly after the July international arbitration decision against the GOE, awarding $75 million to Oxy (through 12/31/03) in value-added-tax (VAT) drawbacks. Yet, he claims this latest action has nothing to do with that decision. He is also investigating Canadian oil company EnCana, which has its own VAT drawback case before international arbitrators. Last week, under apparent pressure from the GOE, the GOE-appointed arbitrator resigned in the EnCana arbitration. He also was the GOE-selected arbitrator in the Oxy international arbitration and joined the other two arbitrators in the unanimous decision against the GOE. 4. (U) The Procurador seeks to nullify Oxy's contract with the GOE on the basis that Oxy failed to comply with Ecuadorian law by transferring 40% of its block 15 assets to Canadian oil company EnCana without Ministry of Energy authorization and 33 other alleged violations of the law. Under Ecuador's hydrocarbon law, if Oxy transferred its contractual rights to EnCana without Ministry of Energy authorization or is a repeat violator of the law, the contract can be terminated (caducidad) and the area under contract would be immediately returned to the state, with all equipment, facilities, etc. transferred to state-owned Petroecuador, without cost. Upon the Minister of Energy's declaration of caducidad, the oil company will have between 30 and 60 days to resolve any alleged violations. Oxy's Position -------------- 5. (C) Econoffs met August 23 with Oxy's Ecuadorian President and GM Jerry Ellis, who said that while Oxy "could have done things better" with respect to the transfer, Oxy did materially comply with the law. Ellis said Oxy notified then Energy Minister Pablo Teran in October 2000 about the proposed transfer of 40% of Oxy's economic interest in block 15 to a subsidiary of EnCana. In January 2001, after an exchange of letters and information between Oxy and the Ministry of Energy (MOE), Teran sent a letter to Oxy that said, according to Ellis, that Oxy should seek the MOE's approval at the time of the transfer of legal title to EnCana. Ellis said that EnCana fulfilled its preconditions for the transfer this year and Oxy sent a letter to the MOE and Petroecuador on July 15 seeking authorization of the transfer. Ellis claims that Oxy has not assigned any rights and obligations under the Block 15 participation agreement to EnCana. He left Quito on August 24 for Oxy's corporate headquarters in Los Angeles to discuss the matter. 6. (C) Ellis said that 15 of the 33 other violations were for failure to file reports in a timely fashion. These reports fell through the cracks when the responsible employee was transferred to Russia. He claimed the other violations, like drilling without permits, were minor, citing drilling operations that were authorized to begin on January 1, but were actually begun on December 31, as an example of the minor nature of the breach. Other claims include over drilling. Ellis said that fines have been paid for most of the violations. In some cases, administrative procedures have not been completed. Still, the hydrocarbon law does provide for sanctions, including caducidad, for repeated violations of the law. EnCana's in Trouble Too ----------------------- 7. (SBU) EnCana (nearly 50% U.S. investor owned) has problems too. It has set up a data room for potential purchasers interested in its Ecuadorian assets. The Procurador's accusations regarding the transfer from Oxy casts doubt on the legality of the transfer of Oxy's Block 15 assets to EnCana and on any sale of EnCana's Ecuadorian assets. EnCana tells us that it has also been cited for seven violations of the hydrocarbon law. Press reports suggest that all or most other oil companies operating in Ecuador are also under investigation, and some analysts believe Ecuador is seeking to use these investigations to re-negotiate its contracts with all the private oil companies. Embassy Action -------------- 8. (SBU) The Ambassador raised the Oxy issue with Trade Minister Baki on August 23. She explained to Baki that the GOE's apparent retaliation against Oxy for the VAT decision could have serious implications for Ecuador's free trade negotiations and ATPDEA benefits (ref telcons). The Ambassador conveyed the same message to Minster of Economy Mauricio Yepez later that afternoon and again on August 24 to Minister of Government Baca. She also raised the issue during her visit with the Minister of Foreign Affairs Patricio Zuquilanda. The Ambassador spoke with President Gutierrez on August 24, expressing the USG's concern about the Procurador's actions and irresponsible statements to the press. Ambassador suggested Gutierrez form a commission to resolve the matter, noting that Oxy would be willing to sit down and talk (as Oxy had previously relayed to the Embassy). 9. (C) The ministers had also agreed to raise the issue with President Gutierrez and all concurred that it reflected poorly on Ecuador and its investment climate. Baki called it an outrage. Baca said he had tried to dissuade the Procurador from taking the action, telling him it was unacceptable. Even if there were grounds to investigate, Baca said, the Procurador was wrong to go to the press before giving Oxy a chance to respond. Yepez suggested forming a commission to sit down with Oxy to resolve the Procurador's allegations and the VAT drawback case, which the Procurador has appealed to the court in London. Yepez opined that a commission would limit the influence of the Procurador, tone down the rhetoric and provide an opportunity for resolution on all pending matters between Oxy and the GOE. The Foreign Minister noted to the Ambassador that his press comments focused on finding solutions in a calm environment. Comment ------- 10. (C) Clearly, the Procurador is retaliating against Oxy as a result of the VAT arbitration decision. This course of action flies directly in the face of what Ecuador is trying to accomplish -- reach a free trade agreement and attract foreign investors, particularly in the oil and energy sectors. That said, the Procurador might well have technical grounds to pursue actions against Oxy and, possibly, other private oil companies. Still, the most egregious allegation against Oxy is the failure to get prior authorization before the transfer of some assets to EnCana, an accusation that Oxy vehemently denies. The GOE has not, and cannot credibly claim that the proposed transfer from Oxy to EnCana would adversely affect Ecuador's interests. Both are reputable, responsible companies and both are among the biggest taxpayers in Ecuador. Action Request -------------- 11. (C) A strong signal must be sent to the GOE, that government retaliation against U.S. companies that win arbitration cases is unacceptable. We urge Washington interlocutors to engage the GOE to express our extreme displeasure at the abuse of the legal system against U.S. companies (including in the cases of BellSouth, Duke Energy and, potentially, ChevronTexaco) and to reiterate that continuing abuses will have serious bilateral implications. At the same time, we urge Washington to encourage Oxy and the GOE to discuss the pending matters, perhaps along the lines suggested by Minister of Economy Yepez. Post has already begun the process and will continue to vigorously press for a speedy resolution of the current problems and more responsible behavior by the Procurador and other GOE officials in the future. KENNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04