Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04KATHMANDU1406 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04KATHMANDU1406 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2004-07-23 08:12:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | KCOR PGOV KCRM NP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS KATHMANDU 001406 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR SA/INS STATE ALSO FOR INL JWHITAKER LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY NSC FOR GREEN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KCOR, PGOV, KCRM, NP SUBJECT: NEPAL: CORRUPTION CONVICTION AGAINST FORMER MINISTER WAGLE 1. (U) On July 22, the Special Court convicted Chiranjivi Wagle, former deputy prime minister and Central Committee member of Prime Minister Deuba's Nepali Congress (Democratic) party, on corruption charges. The court sentenced him to two and a half years in jail, a fine of NRs. 27.2 million (approximately USD 368,000) and ordered him to provide the court with information explaining his sources of income and assets. This is the first time in Nepal that corruption charges against a senior-level politician have resulted in a criminal conviction. The Commission for the Investigation of Abuse and Authority (CIAA) filed the case against Wagle over a year and a half ago. According to CIAA sources, there are additional corruption cases against three former ministers awaiting trial by the Special Court. News reports indicate that Wagle will appeal his conviction. 2. (SBU) COMMENT: The Wagle conviction, if it withstands the appeal process, will send shivers down the spines of Nepal's many corrupt politicians. This guilty sentence results from three years of the CIAA's tireless investigations and filings of criminal cases against powerful personalities. What is most significant on the Wagle verdict is the judges' unanimous decision on the case. In the past, there have been indications the Special Court's judges appeared too intimidated to rule against powerful political interests and personalities. Up to the Wagle verdict, the judges had only handed down rulings against low and mid-level officials on minor charges (mostly false educational diplomas used to qualify for promotions). If this verdict stands, it could provide a timely boost for rule of law as the Palace, parties and Maoists vie for dominance in the state. END COMMENT. MORIARTY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04