Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04MANAMA1120 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04MANAMA1120 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Manama |
| Created: | 2004-07-15 12:33:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL BA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L MANAMA 001120 SIPDIS FOR NEA FRONT OFFICE - DAS PHILO DIBBLE AND NEA/ARP - TOM WILLIAMS/DAVID BERNS E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/15/2005 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, BA SUBJECT: GOB RE-ARRESTS THE BAHRAINI SIX REF: WILLIAMSON/DIBBLE 07/15/04 EMAIL Classified By: BY CDA MOLLY K. WILLIAMSON FOR REASONS 1.4 (b) and (d) 1. The GoB re-arrested the "Bahraini Six" yesterday afternoon on suspicion of conspiracy to commit terrorist acts. The six were taken to the Public Prosecutor's Office and were transferred to Galali prison at approximately 2:00 a.m. this morning. Amal Ahmed Abdulla Abdul, Under Secretary of the Prosecution, confirmed to PolOff that they were taken into custody after examination of computer hard drives and chemicals seized on July 22. Col. Tariq Mubarak bin Daineh, Director of the Public Security Special Response Team (Najda) and Communications and Abdulla Abdul confirmed to the Embassy this morning that the six will be held for 45 days to develop a criminal case. 2. It appears as though the six detainees may have already started their efforts to elicit public sympathy. Col. Tariq, during his conversations with the A/RSO and PolOff, noted that the six have started a hunger strike to protest their incarceration. At this time, we have no other information or outside confirmation of this development. 3. Yesterday's arrests have aroused local suspicions about the GoB's motives. PolOff and PolFSN spoke with Parliamentarian Fareed Ghazi Raffee, legal counsel for Mohieddin Khan. Raffee expressed his dismay that no evidence was presented by the prosecutor while the six were awaiting detention at the Public Prosecutor's Office. He stated that the questioning was based on hearsay and circumstantial evidence. He believes that the case against Mohieddin is based on his having spent time in Afghanistan in 1989. Raffee stated that he did not know about the chemical and computer evidence until he read the Al Ayam and Gulf Daily News this morning. Rashid Al Ghayeb, Al Ayam reporter and former Fulbrighter, in his comments to PolFSN, reported that he doubts that Al Ayam was able to photograph and report on actual new evidence. He stated that this morning's photo of seized evidence looked "like anything you could download off the Internet." He is confident that the re-arrest of the six is due to US pressure and the GoB's desire to put an end to the U.S. Embassy and the Navy's recent moves to transfer non-essential employees and family members. Al Wasat reporter, Hani Ferdan, who has followed the arrests and detention of possible terror suspects Mohammed Saleh Mohammed and Merbati, doubts if there is any new evidence. He stated that if there is any new evidence, it must have been planted to incriminate the defendants. Abdulla Hashim, legal counsel for five detainees, reported to PolFSN, that he believes that the decision to hold them for 45 days was a political decision since the Prosecutor did not present any evidence. Hashim plans to file a suit against the GoB for slander. 4. Our public diplomacy guidance has been: --- A) We are trying to confirm reports of the re-arrest of the six. --- B) If these reports are accurate, it reflects GoB commitment to public safety and the security of its citizens and foreign guests. 5. COMMENT: It is important to counter widespread public perception that the GoB action is just a put-up job designed to respond to USG pressure and reverse the travel warning, Embassy authorized departure and Navy involuntary departure of families. We insist that the GoB action is not a gift to the USG, but rather, an action taken in light of its own security interests. END COMMENT. WILLIAMSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04