Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04COLOMBO1157 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04COLOMBO1157 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2004-07-12 11:02:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | AMGT CE MV External Relations LTTE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L COLOMBO 001157 SIPDIS OFFICIAL INFORMAL FOR SA/INS E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/12/14 TAGS: AMGT, CE, MV, External Relations, LTTE - Peace Process SUBJECT: OFFICIAL INFORMAL NUMBER 091 (07/12/04) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead for reasons 1.5 d and g. Contents: Son of a Gun First It's the Ship, Now the Gun -------------------------------- 1. (C) With the issue of paying for the Coast Guard Cutter settled, the SLN is now arguing about what kind of gun to put on it. The gun the USN has suggested, a Swedish model, will run about $5 mill with ammunition. The SLN is balking at this, saying they just don't have that kind of money. While trying to see what they can come up with, they are also running into a deadline issue -- the Swedes wanted an answer by July 7. Our understanding is that the SL Embassy has requested from the USN a 30-day extension of the deadline so they can try to structure a deal. The option is to buy a cheaper gun (Chinese?) but that has seve3rla disadvantages: (1) may be difficult to mount and (2) may not be available in time to mount before the cutter leaves for SL. The SLN does not want the cutter to arrive here without a gun. 2. (C) The deal which is being proposed is: (1) the GSL uses about $1 million in unused FMF to pay for part of the gun, and (2) they reduce the ammunition order, which is a large part of the cost. This could bring the total cost down to something they could afford. We have told them that we cannot get them a better price on the equipment itself, as the gun is being sold by the Swedes, not by us. 3. (C) We are not sure where this stands now, but it would be a shame to have spent all of the effort on the Cutter, only to have the deal go sour over the gun. Any info you can provide from your side would be useful. 4. (C) Meanwhile, LTTE political chief Tamilchelvan complained to a Tamil newspaper that we were upsetting the military balance by the cutter sale and other activities. Well, at least we got their attention. LUNSTEAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04