Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04PANAMA1764 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04PANAMA1764 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Panama |
| Created: | 2004-07-09 21:01:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL PM POL SPECIALIST |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PANAMA 001764 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN/BRIGHAM E.O. 12958:N/A TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PM, POL SPECIALIST SUBJECT: PANAMA: PRESIDENT-ELECT TORRIJOS PUSHES CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM - HIS WAY Summary: Extraordinary sessions and hot debate --------------------------------------------- - 1. (SBU) In a surprise move, President Moscoso ordered "extraordinary sessions" of the Legislative Assembly to discuss constitutional reform. The move drew cheers from some civil society groups and criticism from those like former president and second-place 2004 candidate Guillermo Endara who favor convoking a constituent assembly (constituyente). By signing Executive Decree No. 68 on June 30, 2004 to officially call for extraordinary legislative sessions from July 5-20, President Moscosos surrendered major ground to Torrijos and the PRD. 2. (SBU) President-Elect Martin Torrijos held a June 18 press conference to announce that his party, the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD), would propose a package of constitutional reforms to the Legislative Assembly. Since the Moscoso administration and its allies currently control the Legislative Assembly, Torrijos had to convince Moscoso during a June 21 meeting to convoke the extraordinary sessions. Moscoso had announced earlier that there was no time to discuss such reforms and pro-Administration legislators had also told Poloffs there seemed to be no interest in the GOP or the opposition PRD to discuss them. 3. (SBU) Critics, first among them civil society representatives, have taken issue with several of the reforms that the PRD has proposed. The PRD's chief political opponent, the Arnulfista Party, has followed suit. President Moscoso, also Arnulfista Party President, has only "accepted" Torrijos' proposal inasmuch as she agreed to order the legislature to review it. Most recently, President Moscoso delivered a short televised message asking Panamanians to remain alert to ongoing legislative debate. While some of the PRD's proposed reforms have merit, others appear to be driven by political expediency. In any event, we share public (and PRD) skepticism that President Moscoso is truly committed to pushing through these reforms before she leaves office on August 31. End Summary. The package ----------- 4. (SBU) The 90-page document that PRD Legislator Jerry Wilson submitted proposes extensive amendments to Panama's constitution. After offering initially positive feedback on Torrijos' announcement, local lawyers, including a former Supreme Court Justice, and pro-administration legislators quickly labeled some reforms "dangerous" for the democratic system. Though the PRD (Torrijos included) assured that the reforms were open to debate, several proposed reforms have raised eyebrows and called the PRD's "good faith" into question with Panamanian observers. The process ----------- 5. (U) Pursuant to Article 308 of Panama's Constitution, the PRD-proposed constitutional reform package will be discussed during three rounds of debate by the entire legislature (rather than in small committees like other bills). Before official presentation to the entire legislature, the legislature's Government Committee heard concerns from political party and civil society representatives as well as former government officials who oppose certain elements of the proposed reform package. Amending the bill is authorized during first and second debates, but the third round of debate will be limited to a yea or nay vote. If approved, the bill will be published in the Official Gazette. 6. (U) If passed by this legislature, after the new administration and incoming legislators take office on September 1, then-President Torrijos would need to send the bill back to the Legislative Assembly within the first five working days. The new legislature would have the opportunity for another yea or nay vote after a single round of debate. If approved by both (outgoing and incoming) legislatures, the bill must be published in the Official Gazette within the next ten working days after executive ratification so that it may enter into effect. The fundamentals ---------------- 7. (U) The proposed reform package included: -Reducing the number of Vice Presidents from two to one; -Reducing the number of legislators from 78 to 67 (current Constitution stipulates one seat for every 30,000 inhabitants); -Restricting parliamentary immunity (no immunity for legislators in civil or labor matters); -Reducing the number of legislators' alternates (suplentes) from two to one; -Allowing independent candidates to run for legislative seats (electoral law currently mandates that legislative candidates must be nominated by political parties); -Increasing professional pre-requisites for legislative candidacies; -Establishing a mandatory referendum for Canal expansion; -Reducing the transition period between election and inauguration from four to two months; -Eliminating centralized, pre-disbursement control of government expenditures (control previo); -Allowing number of Supreme Court Justices to be defined by legislation instead of the constitution; -Establishing a mechanism for convoking a constituent assembly to enact future constitutional reforms; -Making the Electoral Tribunal's budget independent; -Enforcing the de-centralization of municipalities; The Controversy --------------- 8. (SBU) Some elements of the PRD proposal have generated heated public debate. Detractors accuse the PRD of ignoring civil society concerns that have arisen in various fora like the UNDP-convened dialogue "Foro Panama 2020." Critics say Torrijos has proposed amendments that will impair government functions and threaten the democratic system. Details of three controversial proposals (none of which have been debated yet) follow. 9. (U) ELIMINATING "CONTROL PREVIO": Article 276 of Panama's Constitution grants the Comptroller General (CG) the discretion to decide when to implement pre and post- disbursement controls on government expenditures. This authority has allowed CGs in the past to exercise what some consider excessive power over certain government operations. The PRD reform calls for a new law to classify which expenditures require pre-disbursement control. Three former CGs from Arnulfista and PRD administrations joined forces with current CG Alvin Weeden to uniformly reject this proposal. Professor Ruben Dario Carles, CPA Jose Chen Barria, Dr. Gabriel Castro, and CG Weeden visited the legislature's Government Committee to express their opposition. 10. (SBU) APPOINTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: Article 200 of Panama's constitution divides the Supreme Court (CSJ) into Civil, Criminal, and Administrative Courts, each with three Justices. The PRD proposal would transfer the power to restructure the courts to lawmakers. Opponents claim that by structuring the Supreme Court based on laws rather than the constitution increases the danger that it would become over politicized. Even some PRD lawyers have expressed their opposition. One said, "if the U.S. has nine justices with a 250+ million population, there is no justification for a country with mere 2.9 million to have more than the current nine justices." (NOTE: President Moscoso has appointed five Justices to ten-year terms and opponents have heavily criticized four of them for being closely affiliated with her. Rumors already abound that Torrijos plans to appoint three new justices (one in each court) to gain control of the court. END NOTE.) 11. (SBU) CALLING A CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY: For years, civil society has called for direct citizen participation in the constitutional reform process. Many would even prefer that Panama's constitution be discarded and a new one drafted from scratch. Government and political party elites tend to oppose constituent assemblies, fearing limits to their control over the reform process. Supporters of a constituent assembly failed to achieve the issuance of an additional ballot during the May 2 election that would have consulted voters about constitutional reform. 12. (SBU) Torrijos and the PRD are against a constituyente, which would hamstring the incoming administration; however, to appease critics they decided to include a mechanism for calling one in their reform package. The PRD proposal would require 25% of the voting population (about 475,000 people) to sign a petition calling for a constituent assembly. Civil society groups want to reduce that figure to 5-10%. If the mechanism remains part of the reform package, the end figure will probably be a compromise around 15-20%. Comment: A familiar tune ------------------------- 13. (SBU) The legislature didn't reform the constitution during regular sessions, which ended June 30, and prospects appear just as tough now. Neither President Moscoso nor the 27 legislators who lost their re-election bids have a strong political incentive to promote the PRD-sponsored bill. Arnulfistas might even get more mileage by opposing PRD proposals under the pretext of "ensuring adequate civil society participation in the process." On the other hand, President-elect Torrijos has current PRD legislators working triple-time to build buy-in for reforms in this legislature and the next. 14. (SBU) Given the outright PRD control of the next legislature, the greatest obstacle to passage will be getting the bill through this one. A senior PRD official expressed concern to DCM that Moscoso has no intentions of supporting these reforms but instead is using this public debate to deflect criticism of her government's questionable record on good governance. Embassy believes that some of the PRD's proposed reforms have merit, while others appear driven by political expediency. In any event, we share public skepticism that the badly battered Arnulfista Party is really committed to pushing through this package of reforms, even though President Moscoso could claim some credit in finally carrying out her campaign pledge to reform the constitution. End Comment. WATT
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04