Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04MADRID2417 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04MADRID2417 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Madrid |
| Created: | 2004-06-25 17:05:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PARM PREL SP CWC |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS MADRID 002417 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PARM, PREL, SP, CWC SUBJECT: SPANISH UNDECIDED ON CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION TECHNICAL CHANGE REF: STATE 136811 1. (SBU) Summary: Poloff discussed reftel points June 24 with Marcos Rodriguez in the MFA's Office of International Disarmament Affairs. Poloff delivered the demarche jointly with Enrico Vencenti, political counselor at the Italian Embassy and Peter Spoor, first secretary political officer at the British Embassy. Rodriguez said Spain favored changing the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) to allow Libya to convert its chemical weapons facilities to be used for peaceful purposes. However, Spain was still examining all options for adding the proposed technical change to the CWC, including an amendment. Spain supports a "sustainable, non-discriminatory, non-ad-hoc" solution to change the CWC, but is unlikely to formulate a position before the June 29-July 2 Executive Council meeting. End Summary. 2. (SBU) Rodriguez said that after consulting with France and Germany at the last NPT PrepCom III meeting and the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) meeting, Spain considered amending the CWC the best option to allow new countries to join the CWC and convert their chemical weapons facilities to be used for peaceful purposes. Poloff reiterated reftel contingency points explaining why an amendment would not be necessary or appropriate in this case. 3. (SBU) Rodriguez responded that these issues would have to be studied by the legal advisor in National Authority on Chemical Weapons in the Ministry of Industry. Once reviewed, the Ministry of Industry would make a recommendation to Minister of Foreign Affairs. The Minister would then send instructions to Spain's mission in The Hague. This process would not give Spain time to formulate a position by the upcoming Executive Council meeting, scheduled for June 29-July 2. Therefore, Spain would likely ask for more time to consider the U.S. proposal for a technical change to the CWC. 4. (SBU) Rodriguez said that he did not expect Spain to reject the draft language contained in U.S. proposed technical change to the CWC. The question remains whether Spain would accept this measure as a technical change or as an amendment, as proposed by the French and Germans. Spain is more likely to accept the U.S. proposal if France and Germany do not express strong objections to the U.S. draft proposal. Poloff left a copy of the contingency points with the Rodriguez, as well as with the British and Italian political officers. We will report any new developments in Spain's position. ARGYROS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04