Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA3409 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA3409 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-06-15 16:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | EFIN EAID PREL TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 003409 SIPDIS STATE FOR E, P, EUR/SE AND EB/IFD TREASURY FOR OASIA - LOEVINGER, MILLS, ADKINS NSC FOR BRYZA AND MCKIBBEN E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/15/2014 TAGS: EFIN, EAID, PREL, TU SUBJECT: CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR, IMF RESREP FRET ABOUT GOT APPROACH TO REFORM AND THE FUND REF: ANKARA 3202 Classified By: DCM Robert Deutsch. Reason: 1.4(b,d) 1. (C) Summary: In June 13-14 conversations, Central Bank Governor Serdengecti and IMF ResRep Brekk complained about the GOT's approach toward a possible follow-on Fund program. Brekk said the government was in effect asking the Fund how much it could provide, without making any policy commitments or presenting a coherent policy framework. Serdengecti said the GOT's failure to commit early on to a follow-on Stand-by was hurting market sentiment. He claimed that some around the PM were counseling delay pending possible positive steps by the EU and the U.S. -- perhaps in the context of Turkey's role in the BMENA initiative -- that might obviate the need for a follow-on IMF program. Serdengecti also reiterated past criticisms that senior GOT officials do not understand economics or the importance of reform, including preservation of the Bank's independence. Brekk said the GOT's continuing advocacy of fiscally-irresponsible measures -- which are delaying completion of the work for the 8th review -- was a good indicator of what economic policy would be like without a Fund program. End Summary. 2. (C) In a June 13 conversation with EconCouns, IMF ResRep Odd Per Brekk (protect) complained about the GOT's approach toward a possible follow-on Fund program. While saying that the GOT had not yet officially requested such a program, he reiterated IMF Mission Chief Moghadam's recent comment (reftel) that the Turks seemed to be heading in that direction. Brekk said that, instead of presenting a framework for what they wanted to accomplish economically and explaining how additional IMF financing could help, senior GOT officials were in effect asking the IMF how much financing it could provide, without offering any policy commitments. 3. (C) Brekk reconfirmed Moghadam's statement to us last week that senior Turkish officials -- including FM Gul -- had told them that the GOT would not ratify the Financial Agreement covering the USG $8.5 billion loan, because President Sezer had warned he would veto any GOT ratification. Brekk also reiterated Moghadam's concerns that the IMF Board might be reluctant to approve a new Stand-by if the U.S. money were still available or if the Turks refused to take the money. He suggested Board members might ask why the Fund should add to its Turkey exposure when the GOT had refused to accept other extraordinary financing. 4. (C) On June 14, Central Bank Governor Sureyya Serdengecti complained to us that the government's failure to commit early on to a follow-on IMF Stand-by program was hurting market confidence and keeping interest rates higher than they otherwise would be. He claimed that some around the Prime Minister were counseling delay, arguing both that agreeing to a follow-on program would betray a lack of confidence and that possible positive steps by the EU (i.e., a December decision on a date to begin accession talks) and/or the U.S. could obviate the need for such a program. Asked to clarify, Serdengecti said "there is talk" in some circles that Turkey's importance to the United States in the context of the Broader Middle East and North Africa initiative would somehow make the IMF unnecessary (i.e., greater moral hazard). 5. (C) Serdengecti (again) bemoaned the "lack of understanding" among senior Turkish officials about economics and the importance of reform. He said he had explained time and again to the Prime Minister and other ministers the links between, for example, fiscal policy and the current account balance, but they still did not understand. Minister Babacan, he said, understood more than most, but "not fully." Serdengecti acknowledged that the Bank faced pressure on its independence every day, including Babacan's efforts to place "his people" on the Bank's board. Although he had placed two such people, the situation was still manageable. Serdengecti added, however, that if it reaches the point that he cannot do his job independently, he will not hesitate to resign. 6. (C) Brekk also complained about the GOT's approach to economic policy. He said the IMF team's ongoing work on the 8th Review, which he had expected to go quickly, was going slowly because Turkish Ministers kept proposing fiscally irresponsible measures, such as additional investment incentives and large minimum wage increases. Most were not as extreme as Industry Minister Ali Coskun, who had told the IMF team bluntly that Turkey needed more IMF funding to pay for new spending programs, but the overall thrust at senior levels was populist. Brekk suggested that the GOT's behavior during this review gave some indication of how Turkish economic policy would be run in the absence of a Fund program. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04