Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ROME2168 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ROME2168 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2004-06-08 09:36:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV IZ IR SR AF EUN NATO IAEA IRAQI FREEDOM AFGHANISTAN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 002168 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/08/2014 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, IZ, IR, SR, AF, EUN, NATO, IAEA, IRAQI FREEDOM, AFGHANISTAN SUBJECT: MFA OFFICIALS TELL A/S JONES ITALY WILL HELP PUSH FOR QUICK IRAQ UNSCR RESOLUTION; RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS HOLDING UP DECISION ON AFGHANISTAN DEPLOYMENT REF: STATE 122673 Classified By: DCM EMIL SKODON. REASON:1.5 (B)(D). 1. (C) SUMMARY: During a June 4 meeting over lunch on the margins of President Bush's Rome visit, MFA Political Director Giampiero Massolo told EUR A/S Jones that the draft UNSC Iraq resolution was "heading for a good result in a relatively short time," and Italy was doing all it could to help. He said that PM Berlusconi was personally engaged with President Putin to help smooth the way with Russia on the UNSCR. Massolo suggested that an event in New York to signal international recognition of the interim government, followed by a pledging conference sometime in the future, might satisfy Russian calls for an international conference on Iraq. 2. (C) Massolo confided that the Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs agree that Italy should deploy a PRT to Afghanistan, but added that Italy's resource constraints would make it difficult to stand up an FSB alone. Further, Italy is in the process of implementing a tax reduction program and is already stretched thin given its current world-wide deployments. He added that Italy was thinking of taking the ISAF lead after Turkey. Massolo underlined that Italy, like the US, will be looking for a strong statement on Iran from the June 14 IAEA Board of Governors, but added that Italy supports engaging the Iranians on other issues such as regional stabilization. Jones insisted that we must act now to re-establish UNMIK leadership, and not wait for elections as some have suggested. She said that the US view would be to support its European colleagues in developing a list of qualified candidates from which SYG Annan could choose the next UNMIK head, and promised that Amb. Rossin would be ready to take up his post as UNMIK deputy head in mid-August. Massolo asked for US assistance in halting momentum towards establishing additional permanent UNSC seats. An enlargement that did not include Italy would be a &national catastrophe.8 END SUMMARY 3. (SBU) With Massolo were Deputy POLDIR Claudio Bisognero, Director for EU Security Affairs Luigi Mattiolo and NATO Affairs Director Giovanni Brauzzi. The DCM, SA Deborah Mennuti and Poloff Jim Donegan (notetaker) accompanied A/S Jones. ----------------------------- Iraq UNSC Resolution Strategy ----------------------------- 4. (C) Massolo began by noting that recent meetings indicated an excellent "chemistry" and working relationship between President Bush and PM Berlusconi, symbolic of Italian-US cooperation on a broad range of issues. For instance, Massolo felt that the draft UNSC Iraq resolution was "heading for a good result in a relatively short time," and Italy was doing all it could to help. He acknowledged some foot dragging by the Russians, centering on Moscow's concerns over moving too quickly and the need for true legitimacy for the interim government but, Massolo continued, these issues did not represent significant stumbling blocks to the ultimate approval of the resolution. Massolo said that PM Berlusconi was personally engaged with President Putin to help smooth the way with Russia on the UNSCR. 5. (C) A/S Jones expressed USG appreciation for Italy's role throughout the UNSCR deliberation process, and underlined that Secretary Powell has told Russian FM Lavrov that the US has no objection to Russia's proposal for an international conference on Iraq, but that it could not be a precondition to a UNSCR. Jones also underscored that the USG could not accept excluding some non-permanent Security Council members from the conference. The participant formula should either include all Security Council members or just the Permanent members. The USG would also not want to see Italy excluded. Massolo said that Russia realizes that a conference could not be a condition for the UNSCR, and pointed out that in any case it was unlikely that Iraqi authorities would want a conference at this time. He suggested that an event in New York to signal international recognition of the interim government, followed by a pledging conference sometime in the future, might be a compromise that addressed Russian concerns. 6. (C) A/S Jones noted that UNSG Annan was sponsoring a "Friends of Iraq" meeting of some 40 countries in New York during the week of June 7, and that President Bush was hopeful that the resolution could be voted on within the next week. Massolo and Jones agreed that this timing was critical, and that the resolution should not be the subject of negotiation at the G-8 Summit. Massolo reported that the UK was optimistic that the side letters to the resolution could be completed as early as June 4. 7. (C) In order to gain wider acceptance for the resolution, Massolo proposed that the current draft be modified slightly to include "cosmetic, eye-catching phrases," such as references to "international humanitarian law" and the "sovereignty of the Iraqi people." He said it would also help if the resolution referenced specific dates for elections and force withdrawal. Massolo was pleased to learn from Jones that the draft to be tabled in New York later that day contained language along those lines. 8. (C) Massolo suggested that the resolution address the possibility of an international conference, in general terms, as a negotiating tool to use with the Russians. He also proposed that it include formation of an &Iraq security council8 composed of the MNF, Iraqi military and government, as a forum for coordination during the interim period. A/S Jones indicated that Secretary Powell would explore these ideas with FM Frattini later that day (septel). 9. (C) Massolo further predicted that a resolution &package8 that contained the above elements would help the Italian government when it came time for Parliament to authorize extension of the Italian military presence in Iraq at the end of June. The more multilateral the presence, the better for public relations, he added. The main internal Italian concern was not the Left per se, but the &pacifist and Catholic8 elements that transcend party lines. President Bush,s meeting with the Pope would help in that regard. -------------------------- Afghanistan PRT Deployment -------------------------- 10. (C) Turning to Afghanistan, Massolo said that the Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs agree that Italy should deploy a provincial reconstruction team (PRT), but added that Italy's resource constraints would make it difficult to stand up a forward support base (FSB) alone. Further, Italy faces mounting budget constraints. &Tax reduction is a costly business,8 he emphasized, and therefore the Ministry of Finance had an increasingly strong say in decisions relating to foreign military deployments. Italy is also ending conscription at the end of 2004, Massolo added, and MOD officials are beginning to worry about how Italy will be able to maintain its 9000 troops currently deployed abroad under the constraints of an all-volunteer military. Italy would always need to keep troops available to deploy to the Balkans should the situation there deteriorate, as it did in Kosovo in March. Still, averred Massolo, it will help the US position if President Bush continues to emphasize to PM Berlusconi the importance of the PRT and FSB to US strategic interests. 11. (C) Massolo added that Italy was thinking, &in parallel, not as a substitute8 for PRT deployment, of taking the ISAF lead after Turkey. He was optimistic that Italy would reach decisions on all these issues prior to the NATO summit. A/S Jones expressed appreciation for Italy,s outstanding contribution to peacekeeping efforts worldwide, and said she understands the resource constraints under which many of these political decisions must be made. She also underlined USG gratitude for Italy,s role in the Global Peacekeeping Operations Initiative to be highlighted at the Sea Island G-8 Summit. ---------------------------------- US-EU/Istanbul Summit Preparations ---------------------------------- 12. (C) A/S Jones had hoped for a more operational EU-US statement on the Middle East than the draft from Brussels. Mattiolo emphasized that the document was indeed just that, a working draft that had not been formally circulated to all Member States, and that Italy agreed with the US view that the Dublin statement should be more action oriented. Mattiolo predicted that a more acceptable draft incorporating US comments would be ready for review by June 9. Brauzzi added that work was proceeding on the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, which would offer a menu of options on a self-selection basis to countries in the region wanting to participate in stabilization efforts. A/S Jones said that at the Istanbul Summit, the US would see how far we could get on the question of a possible NATO presence in Iraq. One problem is that the timing was wrong, coming as it did just prior to the transfer of sovereignty to the interim government. Both agreed that the door must remain open for a NATO or other multilateral role in the Security Council Resolution. --------- Iran/IAEA --------- 13. (C) Reiterating the need for a &balanced8 approach towards Iran, Massolo told Jones that Italy, like the US, will be looking for a strong statement from the June 14 IAEA Board of Governors meeting that makes clear and unconditional the need for Iran to cooperate fully with the IAEA and to comply with its nonproliferation commitments. In fact, when he visited Tehran he told Iranian officials that &any other country would already have been called before the UNSC.8 That said, continued Massolo, &we must not lose Iran.8 We can engage the Iranians on other issues, he suggested, such as regional stabilization, so as to make them feel part of the international community. While he did not criticize directly the results of the EU-3 initiative, he said that he was not enthusiastic, from an EU-institutional standpoint, about such &pioneer groups8 acting outside EU negotiating structures. Note: Poloff delivered reftel non-paper to MFA Office Director for Arms Control Giovanni Ianuzzi on June 3. End Note. ---------- UNMIK HEAD ---------- 14. (C) Massolo was looking forward to continued close cooperation with the US and in the Contact Group on Balkans stabilization, especially in Kosovo. Quint Ambassadors would discuss that day in New York nominations for head of UNMIK A/S Jones said that the US role would be to support its European colleagues in developing a list of qualified candidates from which SYG Annan could choose. The US was proposing Amb. Rossin as UNMIK deputy; he would be ready to take up his post in mid-August. Jones insisted that we must act now to re-establish UNMIK leadership, and not wait for elections as some have suggested. ----------- UNSC Reform ----------- 15. (C) Massolo concluded the meeting with a plea for US assistance in halting what Italy sees as momentum towards establishing additional permanent UNSC seats. He cited increased coordinated &activism8 by Germany, Brazil and Japan, among others, to use efforts to reform and streamline the UN as a means of increasing the number of permanent seats in the UNSC, which would have exactly the opposite effect desired by those members, including the US, who wish to see a more efficient UN. Under any Rome government, an enlargement that did not include Italy would be a &national catastrophe.8 A/S Jones promised to speak with A/S Holmes and Amb. Cunningham to plan a course of action. 16. (SBU) A/S Jones has cleared this message. Visit Rome's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/rome/index.cf m SKODON NNNN 2004ROME02168 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04