Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04YEREVAN1287 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04YEREVAN1287 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2004-06-04 12:21:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV AM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001287 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN, EUR/ACE, EUR/PGI, DRL DEPT PLEASE PASS USAID E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PREL, PGOV, AM SUBJECT: BUSINESS AS NOT-SO-USUAL IN ARMENIA'S PARLIAMENT 1. (U) Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect accordingly . ------- SUMMARY ------- 2. (SBU) More than one year into the legislative season, a boycotting opposition, spotty attendance by pro-government deputies, continued political saber-rattling between parties and even occasional filibusters have raised questions as to the effectiveness of Armenia's National Assembly (NA). With few exceptions, Speaker Artur Baghdasaryan has successfully painted a picture of "legislative business as usual" in the midst of opposition rallies and an uncertain political climate. The absence of opposition party deputies, however, has clearly altered the dynamic within the parliament. While the governing coalition commands a quorum capable of passing new laws, the NA has tabled or voted down draft legislation proposed by the GOAM on three occasions, with small pro-government parties taking advantage the situation to flex their political muscle through abstentions. The Speaker, in coordination with pro-government party offices, has taken on a new role as party whip as he is forced to call in habitually absent parliamentarians and to ensure that pro-government seats are filled during crucial votes. We have no remotely reliable indication that President Kocharian plans to dissolve the NA. End Summary. --------------------------------------------- - EAGER TO PORTRAY A BUSY, PRODUCTIVE PARLIAMENT --------------------------------------------- - 3. (SBU) With only a few exceptions, Speaker Arthur Baghdasaryan has successfully painted a picture of "legislative business as usual" in the midst of opposition rallies and an uncertain political climate. Frequent press conferences and media events have highlighted a productive National Assembly even though the 22 opposition deputies of the Justice Bloc and National Unity Party continue to boycott regular sessions. For their part, pro-government coalition parties appear to be making significant efforts to counter any indication by media and international observers that volatility in Armenian party politics has affected parliament's operations. ---------------------------------------- STILL A QUORUM -- BUT ALSO A NEW DYNAMIC ---------------------------------------- 4. (SBU) The ongoing boycott by opposition deputies has in many respects, however, altered the dynamic within the National Assembly. While one can easily categorize 94 of the National Assembly's 131 Deputies as "pro-government," mobilizing these 94 legislators has not been an easy task for National Assembly leadership. The Speaker's office and governing coalition party offices have had to increase their roles as party whips as they are forced to call-in habitually truant pro-government parliamentarians and ensure that pro-government seats are filled during crucial votes. Calls by pro-government deputies to scrutinize attendance records against attendance requirements as a way to take advantage of a constitutional provision requiring minimal attendance and potentially oust the boycotting opposition came to nothing. The possibility that the NA could formally scrutinize attendance records worried some deputies (specifically a handful in the governing Republican Party) who feared any action to remove "absent" MPs might adversely affect them as well. --------------------------------------------- -------------- GOAM DRAFTS DON'T PASS, SMALLER BLOCS FLEX NEWFOUND MUSCLES --------------------------------------------- -------------- 5. (SBU) Despite the best efforts of National Assembly leaders to paint a rosy picture of parliament for public consumption, draft legislation proposed by the GOAM has failed to pass on three occasions in recent weeks because of procedural difficulties. GOAM draft laws on higher education, declarations of personal income and wealth, and licensing regulations in the tourism sector did not receive a sufficient number of votes on their third (final) reading in the parliament. On two occasions, deputies from pro- government parties did not respond to calls by National Assembly leadership to attend the voting sessions, but on another occasion, smaller blocs within the parliament (and present at the time of the vote) seized the opportunity to abstain and in so doing exercise their newfound proportional clout in the National Assembly. The 23 MPs from the People's Deputy Group and United Labor Party were present in the chamber during the final reading of the licensing regulation draft law but refused to vote on the issue. Leaders from both of these groups suggested during comments following the vote that this move was an effort to remind Baghdasaryan and coalition leaders that they needed to give their parties certain privileges given new realities in the National Assembly. The three failed drafts concerned issues important to the GOAM as they related to Council of Europe and domestic political commitments. (Note: The NA has also failed to pass a necessary budgetary expenditure law, which could potentially trigger constitutionally mandated ministerial resignations. End Note.) According to newspaper reports, Kocharian and relevant ministers were so irritated by the failure of these drafts that they berated coalition leaders during a closed-door meeting on June 1. --------------------------------------------- ------------ COMMENT: KOCHARIAN UNLIKELY TO DISSOLVE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY --------------------------------------------- ------------ 6. (SBU) Despite isolated rumors that President Kocharian might exercise his constitutional right to dissolve parliament and call for new elections, analysts suggest that the current status quo works to Kocharian's advantage. Kocharian could see his power base weakened in the event of new elections and the threat of dissolution might actually serve his purposes in keeping coalition parties including Baghdasaryan's Orinats-Yerkir (Country of Law) party from wandering too far from the "Kocharian reservation." The sources of these rumors (small, independent party leaders or party-affiliated newspapers without current representation in parliament) are precisely those who would most benefit from a call to dissolve parliament and hold new elections. GOAM officials from within the executive or the legislature have made no indication during recent conversation that they expect Kocharian to make such a move nor do they appear to be making preparations along such lines. ORDWAY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04