Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04HARARE882 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04HARARE882 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Harare |
| Created: | 2004-05-27 16:43:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL PINR EAID ECON KPAO ZI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 HARARE 000882 SIPDIS NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR J. FRAZER, D. TEITELBAUM LONDON FOR C. GURNEY PARIS FOR C. NEARY NAIROBI FOR T. PFLAUMER E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2014 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PINR, EAID, ECON, KPAO, ZI SUBJECT: MUGABE VISIBLY AGITATED DURING SKY NEWS INTERVIEW REF: PRETORIA 2332 Classified By: Political Officer Audu Besmer for reasons 1.5 b/d 1. (C) SUMMARY: Controversy has swirled around President Mugabe's May 22 interview with Sky News. The fallout might result in some turmoil within the higher echelons of ZANU-PF, and some discomfort for Mbeki, but it is unlikely to affect Mugabe's domestic political fortune. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) Sources inside Mugabe's cabinet have said that Minister of Information Jonathan Moyo opposed the interview, while ZANU-PF Secretary for Information and Publicity Nathan Shamuyarira and Minister of Special Affairs for Land Reform John Nkomo, supported it. 3. (C) The GOZ reportedly believed that by agreeing to a Sky News interview with the President, the GOZ would get positive treatment and Mugabe's image would be bolstered before an international audience. The deal almost fell through when an initial Sky News team left with no interview on May 12, reportedly on Jonathan Moyo's instructions to the Department of Immigration to request their departure. When Sky News subsequently ran a balanced story on land reform that concluded that history would judge whether the Zimbabwean land reform exercise was right, the GOZ allowed Sky News to return, probably anticipating that the tone of the Mugabe interview would be "let history judge". The actual interview took a more "hard talk" approach. Although he made one pointed comment directed at the 'racist white mentality' of the interviewer, Mugabe remained articulate throughout. He was, however, clearly agitated at times, caught off-guard, and made a number of ill-considered statements that have had repercussions. Talks Not Necessary ------------------- 4. (C) Mugabe said that because the MDC's voice was heard in parliament, interparty talks were not necessary. The statement clearly contradicted the GOZ's recent party line on interparty talks, and did not jive with South Africa's longstanding rhetoric that talks are ongoing and are the best route to political reconciliation in Zimbabwe. Mugabe's comment apparently stirred some public reaction from the South Africans (Ref). Who's Paying for Mugabe's Residence? ------------------------------------ 5. (C) Referring to Mugabe's retirement mansion in the posh Harare suburb of Borrowdale Brook, the interviewer asked if Mugabe himself were corrupt and how he had funded the construction of a twenty-five room mansion. Mugabe, visibly surprised, gave a somewhat rambling answer saying that the builders were Yugoslav, but ZANU-PF was paying. Mugabe said he had received tiles and roofing materials from the Chinese and timber from former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir. A May 26 article in the Malaysian newspaper Malaysiakini quoted Malaysian opposition leader Lim Kit as shocked that Malaysian funds might have been used to fund the personal residence of the dictator of a rotten and corruptible regime. The same article quoted Malaysian Deputy Foreign Minister Joseph Salang Gandum as denying that funds were given to Mugabe for his house and saying that the government would check into the allegation. Plenty of Food? --------------- 6. (C) Mugabe categorically stated after some prodding that Zimbabwe would in fact produce 2.3 million metric tons of maize this year, would have a food surplus, would not need donor food assistance, and definitely would not buy food from elsewhere. On May 26 Harare-based Australian diplomats informed Emboff that the Australian Embassy in Harare had issued visas to Zimbabwe Grain Marketing Board (GMB) officials who were currently in Australia negotiating a deal to buy wheat from the Australia Wheat Board through an American brokerage firm. Emboffs are in possession of a November 2003 memo from the local Jewel Bank to the GMB confirming a US$80 million loan as part of a US$700 million loan facility to purchase grain for Zimbabwe. The memo states that part of the US$80 million would be for maize, and part would be for wheat. The facts do not mesh with Mugabe's statements. Trade Increasing or Decreasing? ------------------------------- 7. (C) Mugabe stated that contrary to published figures, trade between South Africa and Zimbabwe had not declined by 15 billion Rand in 'fact', trade with South Africa had been increasing for the past few years. The interviewer pointed out that Mugabe's statements contradicted published figures which said that trade between South Africa and Zimbabwe had declined. Succession a Taboo Topic ------------------------ 8. (C) Mugabe asked the interviewer who had commented on succession. The interviewer said Jonathan Moyo had. Mugabe said it was fine to discuss succession, but it was unacceptable for ZANU-PF officials to jockey for position. Responding in typical vitriolic fashion, Jonathan Moyo in a Herald article on May 27, denied that he had conferred with anyone from Sky News before or after the interview. He said Sky News was a colonial mouthpiece that had continually demonized the President and burned Zimbabwe through the fires of falsehoods. Comment: -------- 9. (C) This was not Robert Mugabe's finest hour. Sky News took off the kid gloves once it obtained the interview it sought, and Mugabe suffered treatment to which he is rarely, if ever, exposed, thanks to the captive government media and his normal reluctance to engage with the international press. Since the interview, Moyo has gone into full spin control mode, hoping to shore up his own image which may have been damaged by the association of his name to the succession issue. Going a step further, the Zimbabwean Ambassador to South Africa publicly castigated the South African media for saying that ZANU-PF was not interested in talks with the MDC, apparently denying what Mugabe clearly stated in the interview. It is still unclear what the blowback within GOZ will be, but it is unlikely that the stocks of those who promoted the interview have gone up in Mugabe's eyes. 10. (C) Continued: Regardless of the obvious inconsistencies, any damaging part of the interview is unlikely to be broadcast by the state-controlled Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC). It is therefore unlikely to affect Mugabe's image with ordinary Zimbabweans who generally do not have access to satellite television. SULLIVAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04