Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BOGOTA4888 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BOGOTA4888 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bogota |
| Created: | 2004-05-13 16:28:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EAIR CO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BOGOTA 004888 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAIR, CO SUBJECT: COLOMBIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY TO VISIT FAA Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect accordingly. 1. (U) Summary. Sub-Director from Colombia's Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) plans to visit FAA in Miami and Washington to discuss recent FAA inspection. The GOC was not pleased with the results of the inspection, and is taking steps to comply with FAA recommendations. End Summary. 2. (SBU) In late April, FAA inspectors traveled to Bogota to perform follow-up inspections of Avianca and Vertical Aviation repair shops. FAA inspectors were satisfied with Avianca's repair shop but prohibited Vertical Aviation's shop to work on U.S. registered products because it failed inspection, (Vertical Aviation works on Bell helicopters). FAA will re-inspect Vertical Aviation in late June. The FAA officials also briefed the CAA on deficiencies found in the CAA's inspection program. FAA inspectors believe that training and resources are insufficient for CAA inspectors. The FAA also noticed that inspectors were not enforcing regulations due to fear of lawsuits by airline operators. FAA notes that CAA authorities are neither supporting CAA inspectors with legal support nor are they following all of FAA inspectors' recommendations. 3. (SBU) Econoff met with CAA Subdirector Colonel Carlos Ramirez regarding the FAA inspection. Col Ramirez privately told econoff he was upset with the findings because he believed that disgruntled CAA inspectors negatively influenced the FAA inspection due to salary disputes. Regarding training, Col Ramirez told econoff the CAA recently hired 49 new contractors and have future training planned. He stated resources, such as computers and internet access, must be shared by contractors, especially due to the increased workforce. Col Ramirez denied a lack of support to CAA inspectors and said if the CAA inspectors feared reprisal from the airlines, they should ask CAA directors to sign off on their inspection results. 4. (SBU) Comment: CAA authorities were caught off guard and not prepared for the FAA's review of the CAA inspection program. To address the FAA's concerns, Col Ramirez plans to hire inspectors on short-term-but-renewable performance-based contracts due to problems associated with current disgruntled inspectors, whom the CAA cannot fire. WOOD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04