Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04COLOMBO772 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04COLOMBO772 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2004-05-12 11:15:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PTER PREL CE NO IN LTTE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000772 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR SA, SA/INS DEPARTMENT ALSO PLEASE PASS TOPEC NSC FOR E. MILLARD E.O. 12958: DECL: 05-12-14 TAGS: PGOV, PTER, PREL, CE, NO, IN, LTTE - Peace Process SUBJECT: Norwegian facilitators upbeat after meetings with GSL and LTTE, but arranging talks will take time Refs: Colombo 747, and previous (U) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead. Reasons 1.5 (b, d). 1. (C) SUMMARY: The Norwegians found President Kumaratunga and LTTE Chief Prabhakaran determined to move ahead on negotiations. The sides need to decide agenda, locale and timing. It's months, not weeks, and negotiations could not begin before late-July at a minimum. The new government needs to understand unilateral actions are not helpful. The Indians have no interest in changing the nature of their engagement. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) Norwegian Deputy Foreign Minister Vidar Helgesen briefed donor Chiefs of Mission May 12 on the visit by Norwegian Foreign Minister Petersen May 10-11. Petersen met President Kumaratunga twice, and met Prabhakaran in Kilinochchi on May 11. Helgesen stayed on after Petersen's departure and would meet Kumaratunga again before leaving himself on Thursday. Helgesen said that despite the difficult political scene in the South, he found both parties "determined to move ahead." There were three categories of issues that needed to be discussed before negotiations resumed, however. 3. (C) The first item was what should be on the agenda. The LTTE's Interim Self-Governing Authority (ISGA) proposal would obviously be a part of that. There was a question as to how to link that discussion to one on the final settlement. It would also be necessary to keep attention on the Ceasefire Agreement. The second issue was where. Public statements by both sides on this issue had been unhelpful, and Petersen had made it clear the two sides needed to agree. (Helgesen said that the LTTE wanted Europe, because with Balasingham now back in the picture, his health condition made long trips a problem.) 4. (C) The last question was when. Helgesen said that with the amount of preparatory work needed, this was a matter of months, not weeks. At the earliest, negotiations might resume in late-July, early-August. He said that he thought Kumaratunga understood now that it was not desirable to rush into negotiations. 5. (C) Helgesen found it interesting the LTTE was using more "political" content in their discussions now. For instance, they said that they (through their Tamil National Alliance proxies) had won all of the parliamentary seats in the North on the promise to bring development. Therefore they needed to do so to fulfill their campaign commitments. Ambassador asked Helgesen if he had at that point, or any other point, pointed out to LTTE that their behavior before and during the elections -- intimidation and murder of rival candidates, stuffing of ballot boxes, etc -- was unacceptable. It was also stupid, because they would have won a great majority of seats anyway. Helgesen said the Norwegians had not. Ambassador asked if this was not a type of "political moral hazard." Donors should not allow such statements to go unchallenged, or the LTTE would think we accepted their arguments. Netherlands and Canadian Ambassadors chimed in to agree, and said they might go to Kilinochchi to make these points, which Ambassador applauded. 6. (C) Helgesen said Kumaratunga had not yet chosen her chief negotiator or negotiating delegation. She said she would do that once the time of negotiation was settled. Helgesen and a number of others around the table had heard a rumor that Finance Minister Amunugama might get the nod as chief negotiator. Most agreed he seemed a reasonable choice. 7. (C) In sum, Helgesen said, the challenge with the new government was to make them understand that unilateral actions were not welcome. (n.b. this applies especially to Foreign Minister Kadirgamar, who has a habit of revealing his uncleared thoughts to the press.) The point to be made to the GSL, Helgesen said, was that they had to "move in parallel." 8. (C) As a last thought, Helgesen added that he had stopped in Delhi and had a long conversation with NSA Mishra. Despite public comments by Kadirgamar and others on an enhanced Indian role, Delhi has no intention of changing the nature of its engagement. India did not want a direct role in the negotiations. 9. (C) COMMENT: The Norwegians are doing the hard slogging work of trying to prepare the ground well for the eventual resumption of negotiations. We were a bit disturbed by their apparent reluctance to call the LTTE on their egregious human rights violations during election time. We think they heard the message, but it would be useful to reinforce at the June 1 Co-Chairs meeting in Brussels. END COMMENT 10. (U) Minimize considered. LUNSTEAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04