Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BOGOTA4709 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BOGOTA4709 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bogota |
| Created: | 2004-05-10 14:41:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN |
| Tags: | ECON ETRD EFIN CO FTA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BOGOTA 004709 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR BENNETT HARMAN E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/28/2014 TAGS: ECON, ETRD, EFIN, CO, FTA SUBJECT: ANDEAN FTA ANALYSIS: FINANCIAL SERVICES ISSUES IN COLOMBIA Classified By: William B. Wood for reasons 1.5 (b and d) 1. (C) SUMMARY: Colombia's financial services sector is distinguished by a regulatory framework that restricts multi-banking and seeks to control money laundering and capital flight. International financial services firms are restricted to those with a subsidiary in the country, and use of foreign executives is limited by regulation. To fully benefit from an FTA, the GOC should permit multi-banking and allow foreign firms to establish branch offices. Adoption of international accounting practices, shareholder rights and information disclosure would improve investor confidence, while liberalization would reduce the cost of financial services by an estimated 25 percent. Colombian financial institutions are resistant to change and fear entry of U.S. firms with deep access to capital. However, they also wish to capture remittance flows and other business of Colombian immigrant communities in the U.S. This is the fourth in a series of sector briefs developed in preparation for the Andean FTA. The summaries are based on in-depth studies which are available from USAID Bogota. END SUMMARY. Background 2. (U) Colombia began liberalizing financial services in 1991, eliminating entrance restrictions and limits to foreign investment, while allowing for greater mobility of international capital. In 1994, the GOC moved to a financial system in which distinct financial services (insurance, banking etc.) could be owned by the same holding company as long as management of each type of service was separate. This model was adopted instead of a multi-banking model that permits the same firm to provide multiple types of services under the same management. The GOC has studied lifting restrictions on multi-banking, but retains restrictions on international financial flows to control both money laundering and capital flight. 3. (U) International financial transactions are heavily regulated and the GOC requires foreign firms to establish subsidiaries in the country to fully operate, preventing them from entering the market through branch offices. These controls on foreign exchange transactions are maintained in part because they help the GOC combat money laundering. The use of foreign personnel in foreign financial institutions, especially managers and legal representatives, is limited by regulation. 4. (U) Financial services grew from 4.3 percent of GDP in 1991 to 6.4 percent of GDP in 1998, mainly due to liberalization policies. Liberalization also extended to insurance, trusts, brokerage, investment banking, and the management of foreign investment funds and pension funds. However, all of these services remain restricted for international firms, including limits to the purchase of such services abroad. In 1999-2000 the financial services sector contracted significantly due to the country's economic crisis. Although it has rebounded over the past two years due to stable macro-economic policies and a tightened regulatory framework, the sector today represents about 5.3 percent of GDP. Financial Services Issues for Discussion in an FTA 5. (U) Fiduciary, investment banking, commercial loans, leasing, and insurance services are separated from banking services under Colombian law, limiting the operation of banks and other financial institutions. Current legislation permits banking institutions to house such activities in the same office, but management of the services must be separate. 6. (SBU) International banking institutions must establish subsidiaries and must comply with the same capital and other requirements as local financial institutions. Branch offices of foreign firms are allowed to advertise and provide information, but transactions must occur through third parties. Banking industry representatives are concerned large U.S. banks opening branch offices without having to comply with capital investment requirements could readily draw on deep pockets overseas and undercut local banks. 7. (U) International securities traders must have subsidiary offices. The same applies for stock exchanges and exchanges of agricultural products. International stock brokerage subsidiaries must obtain operating license from the Superintendent of Securities. 8. (U) International insurance providers must have subsidiary offices for transactions to be legal. This limitation applies not only to life insurance, pensions, and health insurance, but also to insurance for transportation of people and merchandise. 9. (SBU) Colombian banks wish to capture remittance flows, which topped US$ 3 billion in 2003. Remittances constitute a principle financial flow into Colombia that largely do not pass through the formal financial system despite extremely high costs of wire transfers. The financial sector continues to seek opportunities to direct the flows through formal channels, a goal shared by the GOC to better control money laundering. Establishment of branches in Colombian immigrant communities in the U.S. is a key goal. USAID and IDB are initiating a program designed to integrate remittances within the formal banking system. 10. (SBU) The current regulatory framework for the Colombian securities market does not mandate the adoption of international accounting and audit standards for issuers and intermediaries, nor does it provide for stringent self-regulation. Minority shareholder rights, information disclosure and conflict of interest provisions for corporations need strengthening. Finally, there is no integrated prudential oversight regime for financial institutions in the banking and securities market. New legislative and regulatory reforms that would address these issues are under development but not yet adopted. 11. (C) Almost $8.5 billion in private pension fund assets (10 percent of GDP) is available to stimulate corporate bond and equity markets, but almost all of this is currently held in government debt. An improved regulatory framework (including liberalization of pension funds) could jump-start innovative financing for channeling savings to the private sector. 12. (C) Getting to the Table: What GOC Needs to Do A. Permit multi-banking. The integration of financial services would provide advantages in terms of lower cost and better risk management. If a multi-banking scheme is adopted, regulatory oversight should also be integrated, combining functions of the Superintendents of Banking, Securities, and Credit Unions. B. Permit foreign firms to establish branch offices. Allowing foreign firms to open branch offices would improve financial sector stability. As foreign banks specialize in large customers and commercial banking, profit margins are reduced for local banks, which compete for medium and small customers and those not covered by the financial system. C. Achieve long-term fiscal balance. Fiscal instability hampers the liberalization and diversification of financial services, and heightens interest in the provision of capital controls. D. Strengthen the capital market regulatory framework. Improved accounting, audit, shareholder rights and information disclosure would improve investor confidence and diversify and expand funding for private companies looking to benefit from the FTA. E. Liberalize regulation of financial services. A recent USAID study estimates GOC regulations add some 25 percent to the cost of banking services. Further liberalization would likely generate important productivity gains and improve the competitiveness and diversification of financial services provided to the Colombian private sector. Overall GOC Demands on Financial Services GOC is likely to argue that U.S. banking branches in Colombia must bring substantial capital to invest locally rather than draw on deeper sources abroad. 13. (C) GOC Positions on Key Financial Services Products A. Colombian Banks wish to locate branches in U.S.-Colombian immigrant communities. This would permit capture of a larger share of the remittance market and financial transactions between traders in both countries. Likewise, Colombian insurance companies wish to sell insurance to Colombian communities in the U.S. 14. (C) GOC Negotiating Strategy for Financial Services A. GOC may argue it needs tight controls on international financial transactions to control money laundering and capital flight. GOC may accept additional U.S. technical assistance in fighting money laundering as an alternative. WOOD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04