Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA2590 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA2590 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-05-07 15:32:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PREL KPAO OPRC KMDR PHUM MARR TU IZ |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 071532Z May 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002590 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT. FOR NEA/NGA, EUR/PD AND EUR/SE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PREL, KPAO, OPRC, KMDR, PHUM, MARR, TU, IZ SUBJECT: IRAQ: TURKISH PRESS REACTION TO ABU GHRAIB ABUSE ------- Summary ------- 1. (SBU) Abuse of prisoners by US forces at Abu Ghraib has dominated the Turkish press since the photos were published last weekend. Drawing from reports in US publications, all major papers and broadcast news channels have reported on the abuses in detail. They have also reported fairly and accurately on statements by senior US officials expressing regret and outrage about events at Abu Ghraib. President Bush's comments to Arab television May 5 were widely excerpted in Turkish dailies. Although the media has reported that disciplinary action has been taken against a number of the soldiers responsible, the overall characterization of US practices and the absence of controls in the prison has been extremely negative. The story has drowned out any positive coverage of the US, including on the Cyprus issue, and has hobbled our ability to press for fair media coverage. End Summary. 2. (SBU) Not surprisingly, editorial opinion in Turkey has been almost uniformly scathing. Most columnists have argued forcefully that the abuses at Abu Ghraib make a mockery of the stated US intentions of bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq and the wider region. Fehmi Koru, an influential voice in Islamist circles, argued that the three justifications for the Iraq war - WMD, Saddam's ties to 9/11, and the tyrannical nature of Saddam's regime - have all been shown as empty. The abuses at Abu Ghraib, he wrote, were the final blow, as "Saddam's brutality has been shown as amateurish compared with the brutality of the occupation forces." Many have likened US practices to those of Saddam Hussein. Several have gone further, comparing US abuses with Milosevic's treatment of Muslims in Bosnia or even Hitler's Germany. Mehmet Ocaktan, editor-in-chief at Yeni Safak, alleged that the abuses have turned The Greater Middle East Project into "The Greater Rape Project." The Islamist-oriented press has portrayed the incidents as further evidence of Western contempt for Islam. A columnist in Yeni Safak on May 7, for example, claimed that such abuses "would never have occurred if the prisoners were European Christians." 3. (SBU) Secular editorialists have been no less forgiving. Ergun Babahan, editor-in-chief at Sabah, wrote that the occupation of Iraq has turned into a "war of insanity." He added that it will be difficult for the US to bring charges against Saddam given the "manifestation of hypocrisy" seen in the photographs of abuse. ------------------------------ Some Coverage in Wider Context ------------------------------ 4. (SBU) Several columnists have placed the abuses perpetrated by US forces in a wider context. Mehmet Yilmaz, editor-in-chief of Milliyet, chastises "those who are howling about torture by US forces in Iraq but who remained silent during years of systematic torture in Turkey." Hasan Cemal, another respected Milliyet columnist, condemns the actions of US forces at Abu Ghraib, but urges readers not to lose sight of the broader picture in Iraq. "Instability in Iraq," he wrote, "will only serve the interests of Islamic extremists." He then pointed out that "the soldiers in the photos do not represent the entire US military, Fallujah does not represent all of Iraq, and al-Sadr represents only a minority of Shi'ites." Cengiz Candar, a columnist in Islamic-oriented Tercuman, accused the international media of hypocrisy for its harsh criticism of the US, "when they never made an issue of Saddam's massacres of women and children, routine torture and brutality, use of chemical weapons against his own people, and sending more than 300,000 Iraqis to death and burial in mass graves." --------------------------- Drowning Out Pro-US Stories --------------------------- 5. (SBU) The reports of torture by US forces and the ensuing firestorm in the press have severely damaged our credibility and hobbled our ability to push for fair media coverage. When Haftalik magazine published additional sensational photos allegedly depicting US abuses against Iraqi women prisoners but which we are virtually certain were taken from a pornographic web site, we were unable to respond effectively. Without finding an exact match of the photos on a porno site, our denials are dismissed out-of-hand. Our overall public message on Iraq is taking a big hit, and even positive coverage of the US, particularly on the Cyprus issue, is being drowned out in the furor caused by the Abu Ghraib scandal. 6. (U) Baghdad minimize considered. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04