Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04RANGOON559 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04RANGOON559 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rangoon |
| Created: | 2004-05-06 05:00:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON KPAO PGOV SCUL KWMN BM Economy |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS RANGOON 000559 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV, EB BANGKOK FOR FCS COMMERCE FOR ITA JEAN KELLY TREASURY FOR OASIA JEFF NEIL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, KPAO, PGOV, SCUL, KWMN, BM, Economy SUBJECT: ENERGIZING BURMA'S SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTREPRENEURS REF: RANGOON 465 1. (SBU) Summary: The executive director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand visited Rangoon explaining the benefits of a more active civil society role for the business community and delivering the message that combined voices were more effective in pushing reform. Progressive businesspeople embraced these ideas. They were keen to take steps to counterbalance the dirigisme, cronyism, and corruption that currently dominate Burma's business environment and indicated they wanted to be prepared for a future, more democratic Burma. End summary. Words to the Wise 2. (SBU) During an April 26-27 visit to Rangoon, the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand's executive director spoke to several groups of progressive small and medium entrepreneurs: including the Myanmar Women's Entrepreneur's Association, a group of female executive MBA students, and a panel of increasingly politically active businesspeople. The message to each was clear: businesspeople have a responsibility to point out the shortcomings of their government's economic and trade policies and try to encourage reform. This point of view resonated with the audiences who, unlike the SPDC cronies and corrupt businesspeople who dominate Burma's economy, have a more global outlook and chafe under the regressive economic and political policies of the ruling SPDC. 3. (SBU) Another important theme of the visit was that a collective voice was better than one, or none. The message, promoting the role of trade associations in civil society, was that a government will lend more weight to an opinion delivered unanimously on behalf of a large constituency. In the Burmese context, the anonymity granted by this type of approach also has tremendous appeal. Assuming the SPDC wants the economy to develop (not at all assured), it might be willing to listen to a block representing the entrepreneurs the regime relies on to fulfill its "national objectives" more than the advice of academics, international organizations, or foreign governments. 4. (SBU) Many of the businesspeople opined that the regime's often bizarre economic policymaking may be based in part on ignorance rather than obstinacy. If this is true, the executive director made the case that business associations have an educating role to play. The trick, all agreed, was finding the best conduit to the key one or two decisionmakers. Civil Society Lacks Business Input 5. (SBU) At a well-attended talk at the American Center, the executive director addressed the topic of "Business in Civil Society." The remarks focused on issues like corporate citizenship and the advocacy and educating role of a trade association. As business here plays very little role in society other than to make money, these topics were fairly new ground for most of the attendees. However, the concepts were very well received and elicited many questions on the mechanics of business groups and many requests for further capacity building. Comment: Cautious but Interested 6. (SBU) Throughout the sessions, the businesspeople were initially cautious and somewhat skeptical, coming up with many excuses why they couldn't become more politically active. However, as our discussions progressed they came to accept the idea that the business community was not yet playing an adequate or positive role in civil society and that it should take steps to become better organized. Even if influencing this current government was difficult, thought and preparation now would pay dividends for progressive entrepreneurs in a future, democratic Burma. End comment. Martinez
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04