Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04HARARE720 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04HARARE720 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Harare |
| Created: | 2004-04-29 05:46:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV ZI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 290546Z Apr 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HARARE 000720 SIPDIS SENSITIVE NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR J. FRAZER, TEITELBAUM LONDON FOR C. GURNEY PARIS FOR C. NEARY NAIROBI FOR T. PFLAUMER E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, ZI SUBJECT: ELECTORAL ACT AMENDMENT TO DEGRADE ELECTORAL ENVIRONMENT FURTHER REF: REF: 03 HARARE 874 ------- Summary ------- 1. (SBU) The electoral environment in Zimbabwe continues to deteriorate. The reintroduced Electoral Amendment Bill would make the electoral environment more restrictive and less transparent in the run up to the March 2005 parliamentary elections and move Zimbabwe further away from the norms and standards set by the Southern Africa Development Community Parliamentary Forum. End Summary. ---------------------------------------- Electoral Amendment Bill Marshals On ---------------------------------------- 2. (U) The recently gazetted Electoral Amendment Bill would make the electoral environment more restrictive and less transparent ahead of the March 2005 Parliamentary elections. The latest incarnation of the Electoral Amendment Bill--the last received an adverse report from the Parliamentary Legal Committee (PLC), the committee responsible for ensuring the constitutionality of legislation, and an unfavorable report from the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Justice, Legal, and Parliamentary Affairs in March 2003--retains many of the changes stakeholders, the PLC, and the portfolio committee found objectionable, such as stricter regulations governing voter education, voters roll inspection and compilation, postal voting and campaigning. Noticeably absent from the most recent draft are provisions governing the selection and accreditation of monitors and observers. (Reftel) (Note: The new bill refers to clauses that do not exist in the Electoral Act as it stands today. It is clear that the bill drafter was referring to the pre-February 27, 2002 version of the Act, before the Supreme Court declared the January 2002 General Laws Amendment Act, the act which amended the Electoral Act, null and void. It is unclear whether the GOZ reconsidered inclusion of the points on observers and monitors or if these clauses were omitted because the bill drafter erroneously believed these clauses to be in the Act already. End Note) 3. (U) Some of the more egregious proposed Electoral Act changes include: -Removing the clauses that allow a person to make photocopies of voters, rolls and allow the constituency registrar to have the voters roll printed and make available to the public for a fee. This is a new clause that was not present in the previous version of the Bill. -Enhancing ESC control over voter education. Others may be able to provide voters, education provided they satisfy seven conditions, among which is not receiving foreign funds to assist in the education process. (Note: All significant NGOs involved in voter education rely on foreign-sourced funding. End note.) Political parties may still provide their own voter education programs. The amendment makes violation of the law a criminal offense subject to a fine and/or imprisonment of up to six months. Previously, there were no restrictions on civic organizations conducting voter education or the source of funding. -Restricting postal voting to members (and their spouses) of the disciplined forces, diplomatic service or a constituency registrar, presiding officer, polling officer, or counting officer away on duty on election day. In the past, persons unable to go to polling stations because of ill health or infirmity; residing more than 20 kilometers from the nearest polling stations; and those who had good reason to believe they would not be in their constituency on polling day were allowed to vote by mail. Zimbabweans studying or temporarily working outside the country could also apply to vote by mail. The new clause also takes all power from the constituency registrar in matters of postal voting and vests it in the Registrar General (RG). -Making it more difficult for people to register to vote by requiring they submit their applications in person or by registered mail to the constituency registrar or such other person the Registrar General may, by notice in the Government Gazette, designate. Since the Gazette is neither timely distributed nor readily available, the RG could, in theory, keep changing the person to whom people must register. -Making it easier for the RG to alter the voters roll without notifying the affected party. -Making it a criminal offense to place a campaign posting on any house, building, wall, fence, lamppost, gate, or elevator without the consent of the owner. The penalty is a fine and/or imprisonment for up to five years. -Restricting who can be nominated for office and complicating the nomination process. Prior to the proposed changes, a person wishing to run for councilor would need not to have been convicted of an offense involving dishonesty in connection with any funds or other property of the council concerned or any other local authority. The proposed amendment states that a person need only be convicted of an offense involving dishonesty to be disqualified from running for office. In addition to this qualification, written certificates of clearance from the Zimbabwe Republic Police stating the person has not been convicted of an offense involving dishonesty or contravened sections of the Rural District Councils or Urban Councils Acts and from the relevant council stating that the candidate does not owe any money to the council must accompany the nomination papers. ------------------- MDC Five Priorities ------------------- 4. In a message delivered by MDC President Morgan Tsvangirai on April 27, the MDC laid out five demands (distilled from the party,s earlier list of 15) in connection with the March 2005 elections: --Restore the rule of law, including disbandment of youth militia and suppression of politically motivated violence; --Restore basic freedoms and rights, including repeal of the Public Order and Security Act and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act; --Establish an independent electoral commission; --Restore public confidence in the electoral process, including through more transparent administration of voters' rolls; and --Restore the secrecy of the ballot. ------- Comment ------- 5. (SBU) If passed, the Electoral Act Amendment Bill would make the electoral environment ahead of the March 2005 Parliamentary elections more restrictive and move Zimbabwe further away from the norms and standards set by the Southern Africa Development Community Parliamentary Forum. The patently arbitrary discretion with which the RG would be allowed to alter the voters roll leaves the process open to gross partisan abuse. Prohibiting people from photocopying or otherwise obtaining a copy of the voters roll makes a mockery of the inspection of the rolls, further enhancing likely manipulation of the rolls. Without certified copies of the rolls, it will be virtually impossible to demonstrate in court the manipulation of rolls over time. 6. (SBU) The amendment would disenfranchise thousands of Zimbabweans who could not make it to their polling stations. Those afforded postal rights--diplomats, soldiers, and police officers temporarily on duty outside the country--as a group seem more inclined to be pro-ruling party than those denied such rights. 7. (SBU) The requirement for candidate documentation of no criminal record further enhances GOZ control of the process. If passed, it is hard to imagine the same police who regularly arrest MDC victims of violence won,t thwart MDC candidacies simply by holding up required documentation. Restricting campaign posters effectively limits one of the opposition's last remaining methods of public communication. Given the propensity for selective application of the law by the GOZ, ZANU-PF candidates will no doubt be allowed to put up posters, while MDC and other opposition posters will be met with the full might of the law. 8. (SBU) ZANU-PF has made an art out of manipulating the legislature to legitimize its monopoly over all means to political power so that its actions are technically within the law and it can control the electoral process. The Zimbabwe Constitution grants far-reaching powers to the President and allows him to effect law with minimal Parliamentary interference. Even without the new Electoral Act amendments, the Constitution grants the president the right to appoint members of the Electoral Supervisory Committee, judges, police, and defense forces, which essentially makes the president in charge of the electoral process. The ruling party has given no indication that it has any intention of accepting any of the changes to the electoral environment urged by the opposition and many in the international community. End Comment. SULLIVAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04