Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TELAVIV2353 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TELAVIV2353 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Tel Aviv |
| Created: | 2004-04-23 13:19:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ECON EAID PGOV KWBG IS GAZA DISENGAGEMENT ISRAELI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TEL AVIV 002353 SIPDIS NEA FOR BURNS/SATTERFIELD, USAID FOR ANE DMCLOUD, JKUNDER E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/22/2009 TAGS: ECON, EAID, PGOV, KWBG, IS, GAZA DISENGAGEMENT, ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN AFFAIRS SUBJECT: ROLE OF WORLD BANK IN GAZA DISENGAGEMENT PLAN Classified By: Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer, Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) THIS USAID CABLE HAS BEEN CLEARED WITH CONGEN JERUSALEM AND EMBASSY TEL AVIV 1. (C) Summary: On Tuesday, April 20, USAID/West Bank and Gaza Director Garber and Deputy Director Ellis, met with Nigel Roberts, World Bank Country Director. The meeting focused on the Bank's current thinking regarding Gaza disengagement and the Bank's specific plans for organizing an assessment mission to identify issues related to the disengagement. End Summary. 2. (C) Nigel Roberts reported that PA Minister of Finance, Salam Fayyad, and Minister of Planning, Nabil Qassis, participated in the LACC meeting of April 20. Unfortunately, security concerns precluded USG participation in this meeting and, coincidentally, the EC also did not have a representative present due to other engagements. To Roberts' surprise Fayyad spoke about Gaza disengagement. Salam began by noting the "unfortunate assurances given to Sharon" and commenting that "we have to wait until the dust settles,". He then stated that the PA has been thinking about Gaza/WB reconstruction issues and, in this context, views existing donor mechanisms as adequate, i.e., no need for, and a strong opposition to, new mechanisms to deal with Gaza disengagement considerations. Further, he specifically noted that he saw no need for a separate fund for Gaza. With regard to the role of the World Bank, Fayyad recommended that the Bank role should parallel that played in the early 1990's, and would be consistent with the Bank's official designation as the Secretariat of the AHLC. He then indicated that the PA would SIPDIS welcome a World Bank analytical consideration of Gaza withdrawal, including what type of opportunities this would open, and that this effort should be treated not as a special exercise, but as part of an overall development plan. Roberts then indicated that he would be checking with Nabil Qassis and other PA officials to confirm whether the PA is ready for a World Bank assessment. 3. (C) Roberts advised USAID of his intention to grant an interview the next day to Ha'aretz newspaper in order to counter what the Bank, including Wolfensohn, fears is the wrong impression created by Israeli leaks regarding what the Bank has agreed to undertake in response to the Sharon disengagement plan. The Bank is particularly concerned that the distorted reporting of World Bank intentions vis a vis the Gaza disengagement could undermine the Bank politically in the Middle East. Specifically, he will state that the Bank is willing to play a constructive role at the behest of the relevant parties and that the Bank (and implicitly all donors) is committed to the continued viability of the PA (e.g., the about to be launched budget trust fund). He said that he would further clarify that the Bank has agreed to play only a technical advisory role and not, repeat not, a custodial role with regard to the assets of evacuated settlements and that the Bank legally could not be the agent for compensation of settlers. Lastly, he would note that Israel is not a Bank eligible borrowing country, and so expectations that the Bank might provide loans or guarantees for Negev development are misplaced. 4. (C) All the above said, the Bank is ready, with appropriate concurrence from the PA and the Europeans (who the Bank wants to make sure are on board since their ultimate financial support to any reconstruction plan would be crucial), to organize a six-person, ten-day mission to the region. Roberts' current thinking is for an initial scoping mission during the May 6 through 16 period. The team would focus on identifying issues that would need to be addressed by the parties and the donors before a comprehensive (or even preliminary) reconstruction plan could be prepared. The assessment would cover such issues as the security regime, level of technical interaction between GOI and PA, transport and access issues that would facilitate economic development, etc. The team also would visit the settlements from where Israel would withdraw, which could include the specified settlements in the northern West Bank, as well as in Gaza. In addition to meetings with relevant local actors, Roberts anticipates an interactive engagement between the team and the core donors. Once the team completed this preliminary stage, then a decision would be made as to whether it makes sense to complete a more comprehensive reconstruction planning document. 5. (C) Roberts emphasized that the Bank does not want to be seen as being alone in responding to these developments. Clearly, even if they have lead responsibility on the preliminary assessment, they want this undertaken under a broader donor/political umbrella such as the AHLC or Quartet and with PA endorsement. In this regard, he indicated US signals would be critical and commented that a US assistance pull-back from Gaza, whether over security or political considerations, would make the Bank's effort to create momentum very difficult. (Note: The Bank is responsible for helping the Palestinians establish a Coastal Water Utility, which is a major complement to the USAID large infrastructure projects; they too have faced difficulties in awarding a tender, but have recently recommitted to moving their effort forward. End Note.) 6. (C) Lastly, Roberts noted that the Bank's plans are not widely known and requested that we not share beyond colleagues in the USG. At the same time, he realized that, to field a team by May 6, he would require the necessary assurances by the middle of next week. ********************************************* ******************** Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv You can also access this site through the State Department's Classified SIPRNET website. ********************************************* ******************** KURTZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04