Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA2291 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA2291 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-04-21 16:06:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 211606Z Apr 04
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002291 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/13/2014 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, TU SUBJECT: TURKEY'S GREYING WOLVES: RIGHTIST-NATIONALIST MHP REF: ANKARA 2204 (U) Classified by Political Counselor John Kunstadter. Reason: 1.4 (b,d). 1. (C) Summary: Leaders of rightist-nationalist MHP are spinning March 28 municipal election results as a victory. According to at least one MHP official, however, the party had expected a better showing. Although MHP leaders profess a desire to bring the party into the mainstream, party policies on core issues -- Cyprus, Iraq, and the EU -- have not changed since the party's electoral defeat in 2002 general election. MHP officials hope to exploit any perceived missteps by ruling AKP on these issues to build on momentum they claim they have after March 28. End summary. ----------------------------------- Election Results Good But Not Great ----------------------------------- 2. (C) Winning or holding onto four provinces in March 28 municipal elections, Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) has recouped some of the sharp fall in popular support the party experienced in the 2002 national elections. In recent meetings, senior MHP officials told us that the party's 10-percent showing in provincial councils -- the best proxy for a national vote -- has restored some confidence among the party's grassroots. Faruk Bal, MHP vice chairman for election affairs, averred to us April 9 that March 28 was a success and in part demonstrated that the party's base has gotten over its defeat in 2002. Bal contended that MHP did well despite receiving almost no positive media coverage in the run-up to municipal elections. 3. (C) Bal and other MHP officials nevertheless acknowledge that the party leadership still faces challenges in recapturing the momentum from 1999 national elections, when MHP soared to 18%. Both Bal and Murat Sevkatli -- head of MHP's political academy -- claimed party chairman Devlet Bahceli is committed to moving MHP more toward the "mainstream", but neither could explain what that might mean. In an April 15 conversation with us, Sevkatli admitted that MHP leaders had hoped for an even better showing on March 28, given the media's focus on Cyprus, which, as a perceived national cause, had in the past galvanized MHPers of all stripes. 4. (C) MHP intellectual and long-time Embassy contact Riza Muftuoglu, who unlike most of his party colleagues is usually a free thinker, offered to us April 20 a more even-handed analysis of the party's performance. Muftuoglu explained that MHP leaders can spin the results as a "victory" by noting that the party finished third in votes for provincial councils and that this is a tacit blessing of the party's general direction. On the other hand, Muftuoglu argued that after factoring in the thirty percent of Turks who did not vote March 28, MHP's showing is much less impressive. "If these had been national elections, we still would not have entered Parliament," he asserted. ----------------- Nothing's Changed ----------------- 5. (C) Our conversations revealed that MHP has not changed its basic policies on core foreign policy issues. On Cyprus, Bal and Sevkatli underscored MHP's strong opposition to a settlement as envisioned in the Annan Plan. Both asserted that a settlement will lead to inter-communal violence and eventually the total take over of the North by Greek Cypriots. In this regard, Bal even claimed that, "since the EU won't take Turkey anyway," the EU is purposefully seeking a solution that will remove the presence of any Muslims within its borders. 6. (C) Despite MHP's strong objections to a settlement, neither Bal nor Sevkatli believes that a meaningful number of ruling AKP M.P.s with MHP resumes will defect and vote against the Annan Plan should it come to Parliament. Indeed, Sevkatli admitted that an MHP-led "March to Cyprus," which will culminate on Cyprus on April 23 with an anti-settlement speech by Bahceli, is merely meant to cement the party's base. In this way, the party hopes to give itself political cover regardless of the outcome. If the referendum is successful and passes Parliament, the MHP base will not be able to accuse the party leadership of inaction. Moreover, Sevkatli asserted that when the inevitable (in the MHP mind) violence breaks out, MHP will be well positioned to say, "We told you so." 7. (C) Our three contacts also expressed dismay with USG Iraq policy, claiming that our cooperation with "those tribes" in northern Iraq (read Kurds) will lead to disaster for the U.S. and Turkey. Bal asserted that Kurds "have been stabbing their allies in the back for centuries." For his part, Sevkatli claimed that USG Iraq policy has created a de facto Kurdish state, which will fuel nationalist ambitions of Turkey's own Kurds. As a result, Sevkatli averred, anti-American sentiment in Turkey is on the rise. He added that EU-related reforms -- e.g. allowing Kurdish language schools -- will unify the fractious Kurdish tribes in Turkey's Southeast, which will encourage greater demands for autonomy and lead to the eventual dismemberment of the Turkish State. ------------- MHP Prospects ------------- 8. (C) Our contacts tell us that MHP's relative success on March 28 was due to: 1) the return to the fold of disaffected MHP voters who had supported the xenophobic Genc Party in 2002; and 2) developments on Cyprus and in Iraq, which they claimed have stoked nationalist flames over the last several weeks. In the latter regard, clearly MHP hopes to use Cyprus, Iraq, and the EU to exploit fears of an AKP sellout of Turkish interests. Whether or not MHP will be able to exploit nationalist paranoia to undermine support for AKP and position itself for the next national election remains an open question. Muftuoglu, for one, expressed doubt: "Under Devlet Bahceli, the party won't go anywhere." ---------------- Eyes on the Army ---------------- 9. (C) In the context of our Cyprus discussions, both Sevkatli and Muftuoglu independently offered their analysis of Chief of the General Staff (TGS) Ozkok's April 13 press briefing on Cyprus and the military's role in society. Sevkatli, who had earlier criticized Ozkok for being "soft" on Cyprus and ruling AKP's domestic policy, assessed Ozkok's statements as much more in line with "what a TGS chief is supposed to say." Muftuoglu asserted that the speech was primarily directed against Ozkok's opponents within TGS but added that his remarks were also a warning to the GOT. Expressing his frustration with ruling AKP policy on a host of issues -- and Ozkok's more moderate approach to the GOT -- Muftuoglu said, "If I were TGS chief, I would have led a coup already!" ------- Comment ------- 10. (C) MHP has a core eight percent of the vote but has no new ideas and relies on circumstantial developments on "national issues" to boost its vote. In any event, we do not see MHP in its current greying state as capable of playing a major national role under the leadership of ultra-fastidious leader Bahceli. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04